Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies - ASE vs Romanian-American University vs Technical University of Civil Engineering Bucharest vs Romanian-American School Of Business - ASEBUSS vs Tiffin University Bucharest
Side-by-side comparison from 102 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and knowledgeable professors
- +Strong, practical, and well-structured programs
- +Good career opportunities and academic reputation
- +Excellent, knowledgeable, and approachable professors.
- +Practical and well-structured courses with real-world application.
- +Numerous career, internship, and international exchange opportunities.
- +Strong engineering programs and knowledgeable teachers
- +Accessible location and good transportation links
- +Ample facilities available
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and irrelevant curriculum.
- -Lack of student focus and prioritization.
- -Perceived as a money-making institution with poor value.
- -Constant and disruptive construction noise negatively impacts sleep and living conditions.
- -administrative and management issues
- -outdated facilities and poor maintenance
- -lack of resources and support
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The university demonstrates a remarkably strong performance in its **Location**, achieving a score of 4.62. Student Life also received high marks at 4.39, with Accommodation and Value scoring favorably around 4.08 and 4.05 respectively. Conversely, **Facilities** emerged as the lowest-rated area, registering at 3.79. Professors and Internationality also fell within a similar mid-range, with scores of 3.89 and 3.80.
This institution demonstrates a well-rounded performance, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest attribute. Students also rated **Professors** highly. Areas for potential improvement include **Location** and **Accomodation**, which received the lowest scores. Other aspects like Facilities, Student Life, and Value fall within a solid mid-range.
Exceptional strengths are evident in student life, professor quality, and accommodation, all receiving near-perfect scores. The university also scores very well in internationality and value. However, facilities represent a notable area for improvement, with a considerably lower rating compared to other aspects.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
~98% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable and supportive professors, structured programs, and good career opportunities. A small ~2% of feedback mentioned outdated facilities and a perceived lack of student-focused administration.
With an average rating of 4.17/5, ~83% of reviews are positive. Students praise knowledgeable and approachable professors, well-structured curricula, and interactive teaching methods. One negative review mentioned disruptive drilling noise.
With a 4/5 average rating, the single review highlights a positive engineering program and atmosphere. Minor feedback mentioned outdated machinery. Approximately 100% of feedback is positive.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Overall, I had a very positive experience with the International Economics programme. The courses provided a solid understanding of global markets, trade, monetary policy, development, and the economic forces shaping international business The programme could still improve in terms of administration, communication, and consistency across courses. Some classes felt more practical and engaging than others.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show