University of Tuzla - UNTZ vs European University Kallos Tuzla - EU Kallos Tuzla vs International Business Information Academy - IPIA vs Premier University vs JPTS Institute Of Science, Management And Technology
Side-by-side comparison from 110 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality, professional, and helpful professors
- +Good educational programs fulfilling expectations
- +Supportive environment and career prospects
- +Friendly and accessible professors
- +Good learning opportunities
- +Modern facilities and location
- +Quality education with supportive staff and professors
- +Modern and well-equipped facilities and classrooms
- +High-quality faculty and international degrees
- +Modern facilities and advanced labs
- +Practical, industry-oriented curriculum
- +Engaging opportunities and open opinion sharing
- +Strong career prospects and support
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and organizational issues are pervasive.
- -Lack of practical application and outdated facilities are significant problems.
- -Some professors exhibit poor teaching methods and rudeness.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited as a major source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff leave students feeling neglected.
- -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources hinder learning.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant, lacking practical application and depth.
- -Administrative and management issues are a major source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Communication breakdowns and a lack of support negatively impact students.
- -Lack of accessible and helpful administrative support.
- -Inadequate or outdated facilities and resources.
- -Poor communication and disorganization from the institution.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Regarding university performance, professors and location stand out as the strongest aspects, both receiving ratings around 4.0. Student life and value are also well-regarded, scoring above 3.5. Areas for potential improvement include facilities, accommodation, and internationality, which are rated in the low 3s. Overall, the university demonstrates a solid but varied performance across these key metrics.
This academic institution received consistently low ratings across all surveyed categories. Areas like facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all scored zero. Consequently, there are no standout strengths or weaknesses to highlight, as the university appears to perform poorly across the board according to this assessment.
This institution demonstrates outstanding performance, achieving a perfect score in Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value. Its strongest areas are clearly these aspects, reflecting a highly positive student experience and excellent offerings. The Facilities rating, while still very good at 4, represents the only slight area for potential improvement within an otherwise exceptional overall assessment.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in student life, earning a perfect score. Its location and internationality are also highly rated. Areas for potential improvement include accommodation, which received the lowest score, and professors, who were rated moderately. Facilities and overall value are considered strong points.
This institution achieves strong ratings in several key areas, notably Professors, Location, Internationality, and Value, all scoring a solid 4. Conversely, Student Life and Accommodation received zero ratings, indicating significant areas for improvement. Facilities are rated moderately at 3.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Around 46% of reviews are positive, praising high-quality staff and curriculum, with some noting occasional subjective grading. About 17% are negative, citing poor organization and lack of practical application. The average rating is 3.49/5.
With an average rating of 4.33/5 based on 3 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students praise the modern design, great location, and the kindness and professionalism of professors and staff. Some suggest improvements for certain faculties regarding curriculum and practical experience.
The sole review is highly positive, awarding 5 out of 5 stars. Students praise the quality education, supportive professors, and modern, well-equipped facilities. No negative feedback was recorded.
All four reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students commend the academic rigor, professional focus, high-quality faculty, and modern facilities. There is no negative feedback.
This single review offers a positive outlook, highlighting the university's great ideas, opportunities, convenience, and excellent career prospects. Approximately 100% of feedback is positive.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The price for the master's is insanely expensive considering what it has to offer. I got an MA in translation and interpreting, but sadly, my colleagues and I barely had any practical exercises in these subjects. Most of the professors were alright though. Bearing in mind where they work, most of them try to do their best. The university is politicized, since the politicians play with it like with ping-pong balls. The only aim is to employ their own people, no matter how incompetent they are, instead of the people who are actually able to do proper work. Anyone in their right mind (since I was not one of those people) will opt to study abroad and obtain the MA degree somewhere else. I paid 2500 KM so I can have a degree from an XY rated university, instead of studying in, say, Germany or Austria, where the prices are identical, or even lower, and where students can also get real scholarships if they're good enough. Once again, a waste of money. If only they (politicians) invested all that money in infrastructure and better equipment, the university would be a much nicer place and the main Uni building would not have 40 YO doors and windows.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show