Royal Institute of Technology - KTH vs Lund University vs University of Gothenburg vs Umea University - UMU vs Malmö University - MAU
Side-by-side comparison from 91 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +World-class facilities and inspiring study atmosphere
- +Strong academic programs with practical application and flexibility
- +Engaging and approachable instructors
- +High-quality education and expert faculty
- +Vibrant student life and diverse community
- +Supportive and welcoming environment
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
- +Well-equipped research environments and facilities
- +Interesting and well-organized programs
- +Welcoming atmosphere and nice campus environment
- +Positive interactions with professors
- +Strong international student community
- +Supportive and approachable professors
- +Relevant and forward-thinking curriculum
- +Diverse and inclusive learning environment
- +Excellent teaching quality and global student community
- +Broadened horizons and expanded knowledge in business and political science
- +Abundant working opportunities to offset living costs
- +Hands-on, immersive, and creative learning with freedom to shape studies.
- +Direct industry insights and practical application from experienced professionals.
- +Strong focus on building relationships with driven, like-minded peers.
- -Administrative & management issues frustrate students.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
- -Lack of resources and support hinder learning.
- -Discrimination and lack of opportunities post-graduation.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a persistent problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and organizational issues from the administration frustrate students.
- -Course content and teaching quality are often seen as inadequate or uninspiring.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently mentioned.
- -Ineffective communication and administrative inefficiencies cause frustration.
- -Lack of engaging teaching methods and unclear learning objectives are recurring complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Outdated facilities and resources
- -Misaligned curriculum and teaching methods
- -administrative & management issues
- -outdated facilities
- -lack of engagement
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a problem.
- -Course content and teaching quality often fall short of expectations.
Exceptional marks were awarded in several key areas, notably a perfect score for **Internationality**. **Facilities** and **Value** also received very high ratings. The university performs well across **Student Life** and **Accomodation**, with solid scores for **Professors** and **Location**. While no area received a low rating, **Location** represents the comparatively weakest aspect among the surveyed categories.
Student life emerges as the university's strongest area, boasting the highest rating. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest score, indicating a potential area for improvement. Other aspects like location, internationality, and facilities also scored well, with professors and value demonstrating solid, albeit slightly lower, marks.
This institution garners exceptional marks for its location, boasting a rating of 4.86. Facilities and internationality are also highly regarded, both scoring 4.71. Professors receive a solid 4.57, and the overall value is rated at 4.29. Student life scores a respectable 4. The weakest area by a significant margin is accommodation, with a score of just 2.86.
This institution demonstrates remarkable strengths, particularly in its international student experience, receiving a perfect score. Facilities, professors, and student life also garnered excellent feedback. While the location is well-regarded, accommodation received the lowest score, indicating an area for potential improvement within an otherwise highly rated university.
Analyzing the university's performance reveals a mixed but generally positive picture. The institution excels in its **Internationality** (3.95) and **Professors** (4), indicating strong global engagement and a well-regarded academic staff. Conversely, **Accomodation** (3.23) presents the lowest score, suggesting room for improvement in this area. Other aspects like Facilities, Location, Student Life, and Value fall within a moderate range.
This institution shines with perfect scores in Facilities, Professors, Location, and Internationality. Student Life also receives a strong endorsement. However, Accomodation and Value for money present areas for potential improvement, indicated by their lower ratings compared to other aspects of the university experience.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths, with perfect scores in Facilities, Location, Student Life, and Value. Professors and Internationality also received high marks, rated at 4 and 4.5 respectively. Accomodation stands out as the comparatively weakest area, though still very good at 4.5, reflecting a generally positive and well-rounded university experience.
All 12 reviews are positive, averaging 4.75/5. Students praise world-class research facilities, inclusive culture, and opportunities for theory-practice integration. Friendly, engaging instructors and diverse, flexible courses are also highlighted.
With a 4.41 average rating, ~98% of reviews are positive, praising high-level education, great student life, and community. A very small amount of negative feedback mentioned racism and time/money waste.
With a 4.71/5 average rating from 7 reviews, students report overwhelmingly positive experiences, highlighting exceptional faculty and enriching academic environments. No negative feedback was recorded.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight a nice environment and good faculty, with only minor suggestions for improvement in specific departments.
Most students (~74%) praise Malmö University's forward-thinking environment, modern facilities, and supportive professors. A small percentage (~9.5%) report issues with resources like printers and overpriced course materials.
This university garners a 4/5 average rating, with 100% of feedback being positive. Students praise exceptional teaching quality and opportunities for personal and academic growth.
Both university reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight the immersive, hands-on approach, freedom to shape studies, and the opportunity to build relationships. Approximately 0% of feedback is negative.
Nothing to show
The university is beautiful, there is no doubt about that. Although it is one of the most multicultural campuses in the world, the course I took was not inclusive for foreign students. The course was advertised as a course designed specifically for foreigners, with classes in English. In practice, many of the classes on the syllabus were actually in Swedish, and the ones that were in English gave exercises or texts in Swedish. I even had a disagreement with one of the professors who, although he was teaching a class that was supposed to be entirely in English, brought slides in Swedish and spoke exclusively in Swedish. When I asked during the break if the class shouldn't be in English, he ridiculed me in front of the class and said that if I was uncomfortable, I should have said so beforehand. The universitys advisors were very understanding, but in the end, I had to give up many of the assigned subjects and replace them with subjects that had nothing to do with my field, just because they were, in fact, taught in English.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
