Universidad de Palermo - UP vs Universidad del Cema - UCEMA vs Universidad Tecnológica Nacional - UTN vs Escuela Normal Superior en Lenguas Vivas "Sofía Spangenberg" - ENSLV vs Torcuato Di Tella University - UTDT

Side-by-side comparison from 39 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Universidad de Palermo - UP: wins 0/2 categories
Universidad del Cema - UCEMA: wins 0/2 categories
Universidad Tecnológica Nacional - UTN: wins 0/2 categories
Escuela Normal Superior en Lenguas Vivas "Sofía Spangenberg" - ENSLV: wins 0/2 categories
Torcuato Di Tella University - UTDT: wins 0/2 categories
San Martin National University - UNSAM: wins 0/2 categories
Universidad Nacional de Lanus - UNLA: wins 2/2 categories
Comparing
Buenos Aires, Argentina
4.30
Read more reviews
13 reviews
×
Best programme: Advertising and Marketing
Buenos Aires, Argentina
5.00
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Industrial and Production Engineering
Best programme: School of Engineering/Technology
Best programme: Translation and Intercultural Communication
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Government and International Relations
Best programme: Education
Category ratings
Facilities
4.40
4.50
3.33
4.00
Not rated
4.29
5.00
Win
Location
3.80
4.50
4.08
5.00
Not rated
4.43
5.00
Professors
4.20
4.00
3.83
5.00
Not rated
4.71
5.00
Internationality
3.80
5.00
2.75
5.00
Not rated
4.86
5.00
Student life
4.60
4.50
3.60
4.00
Not rated
4.71
5.00
Win
Value
3.80
4.50
3.75
5.00
Not rated
4.71
5.00
Accommodation
3.80
4.50
3.27
5.00
Not rated
3.14
5.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Flexible study options and personalized learning paths
  • +High-quality professors with real-world experience
  • +Practical, project-based learning and career support
  • +World-class faculty with practical, real-world experience
  • +High-quality education encouraging critical thinking and idea generation
  • +Excellent value for money
  • +Strong academic programs with industry-experienced professors
  • +Flexible schedules supporting work-study balance
  • +Good job prospects and practical preparation for the professional market
  • +Emphasis on teacher training and translation degrees
  • +Esteemed faculty and industry experts
  • +Comprehensive curriculum blending theory and practice

Nothing to show

  • +Modern campus and well-equipped facilities
  • +High-quality, progressive academic programs and updated curriculum
  • +Supportive and professional faculty and staff
  • +Beautiful, well-maintained campus
  • +Professional, dedicated teachers
  • +Enriching, supportive learning environment
Cons
  • -Administrative & management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning experiences.
  • -Lack of engagement from instructors and insufficient course relevance are common complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations create confusion.
  • -Poor management and communication, particularly concerning administrative tasks.
  • -Outdated curriculum and overly long program duration.
  • -Unattractive facilities and uninspiring campus environment.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a significant problem.
  • -Lack of practical experience and unclear course structure is disappointing.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unresponsive administration create frustration.
  • -Lack of clear academic support and guidance leaves students feeling lost.
  • -Administrative & management issues are frustrating.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a problem.
  • -Lack of resources and support hinders learning.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in student life, scoring a high 4.6, and facilities, rated at 4.4. Conversely, location, accommodation, internationality, and value all received a moderate 3.8, indicating areas for potential improvement. The academic side is well-regarded, with professors achieving a solid 4.2. Overall, the university offers a good experience, particularly in its campus resources and social environment.

With an outstanding perfect score in Internationality, this institution truly shines in its global engagement. High ratings also highlight its excellent Facilities, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, and Value, all scoring a strong 4.5. The only area receiving a slightly lower, though still positive, score is its Professors, at 4.

This institution receives its highest marks for location, followed closely by professors and value. Conversely, its internationality rating is notably the lowest among the surveyed categories. Facilities and accommodation also received mid-range scores, while student life achieved a respectable standing.

This university demonstrates exceptional strengths, with perfect scores in professors, location, accommodation, internationality, and value. Facilities and student life also receive high marks, scoring a strong 4 out of 5. The only area not explicitly rated is its weakest, though the provided data indicates outstanding performance across all surveyed aspects.

Nothing to show

An assessment of the university reveals a highly international environment, with a near-perfect score for Internationality. Professors, Student Life, and Value also received excellent ratings. However, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring significantly lower than other categories. Facilities are rated well, but not exceptionally.

This institution garners outstanding marks across all assessed criteria. Its strengths are evident in consistently perfect scores for facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. No specific weaknesses are identified within these ratings, indicating a uniformly excellent student experience.

Reviews summary
Highlights

University feedback is overwhelmingly positive, with ~77% of reviews rating it 4–5 stars and an average of 4.31/5. Students praise flexible study plans, project-based learning, and excellent professors. No negative feedback was reported.

All three reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight world-class faculty with practical experience, accessibility of virtual classes, and excellent value for money.

~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting good education and job prospects, often with experienced professors. ~14% of feedback is negative, citing outdated curricula, poor management, and unappealing infrastructure.

The single review for Ens en Lenguas Vivas Sofia E. Broquen de Spangenberg is highly positive, giving it a 5/5 rating. This 100% positive sentiment highlights the university's excellence in language education, particularly its teacher training and translation programs.

Nothing to show

All 7 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students praise the modern campus, well-equipped facilities, updated curriculum, and professional faculty. They also highlight progressive programs, student well-being initiatives, and opportunities for career development.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, feedback is exclusively positive. Students highlight the beautiful campus and highly professional, dedicated teachers. Negative reviews are non-existent.

Rating distribution
5★
54%
100%
29%
100%
0%
86%
100%
4★
23%
0%
36%
0%
0%
14%
0%
3★
23%
0%
21%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
7%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
7%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close