London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs ONCAMPUS Global vs Anglia Ruskin University - ARU vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs Peterborough Regional College - PRC
Side-by-side comparison from 425 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty
- +High-quality academic programs and clear feedback
- +Excellent facilities and resources
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
- +Excellent facilities and convenient location
- +Strong academic and personal development support
- +Welcoming and supportive community with friendly, approachable staff and faculty
- +Engaging learning environment with excellent, modern facilities and innovative teaching
- +Emphasis on personal and academic growth through practical experiences and a positive atmosphere
- +Practical, industry-relevant courses and inspiring professors
- +Rich international environment and diverse student body
- +Personal and professional development opportunities
- +Supportive and approachable lecturers fostering a positive learning environment
- +Engaging and educational course content
- +Good college facilities and amenities
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Poor teaching quality and unstructured courses.
- -High fees combined with lack of support and career services.
- -Limited social life and judgmental environment.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep frustrate students.
- -Lack of resources and inadequate support services are common complaints.
- -Poor quality lectures and unhelpful staff.
- -Unreliable internet services and incorrect scheduling.
- -Limited parking availability.
- -Financial concerns and perceived low educational value.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment detract from the learning experience.
- -Inconsistent quality of teaching and support is a recurring problem.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Examining the university's performance reveals a diverse set of scores. The strongest areas are **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving very high marks. **Student Life** stands out as the weakest performing category. Other areas like **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Facilities** received solid, above-average ratings, with **Value** also scoring positively.
Overall, the university garners strong ratings across various aspects. Professors are exceptionally well-regarded, achieving the highest score. Location and Internationality also stand out with excellent marks. Student Life, Facilities, and Value also reflect positive sentiment. Accommodation, while still strong, receives the lowest rating among the surveyed categories.
With an impressive average rating of 4.6, location stands out as the university's strongest asset. Areas like facilities and internationality also received high marks, reflecting positively on the campus environment. Conversely, accommodation, while still a respectable 4.03, represents the area with the lowest score among the evaluated aspects.
This institution garners excellent marks in several key areas. Facilities, Professors, Internationality, and Value all received high scores of 4.125. Student Life and Accommodations are rated lower, at 3.625 and approximately 3.57 respectively, indicating these are areas with more room for improvement compared to its other strengths. The Location score sits at 3.75.
Offering a well-rounded experience, this university excels in **Professors**, **Location**, and **Student Life**, all receiving strong ratings of 4. Conversely, **Facilities** and **Accomodation** present the weakest areas, each scoring a 3. The university also achieves a solid 4 for **Value** and a respectable 3 for **Internationality**, suggesting a generally positive but not uniformly outstanding academic environment.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Approximately 96.6% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable professors, supportive learning environments, and strong academic reputations. A small percentage (around 3.4%) of negative feedback cites issues with lecturing, grading, and course structure.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% of 20 feedback entries rating 4–5 stars. Students praise friendly, supportive teachers, excellent facilities like the library, and effective student support services that build confidence.
~97% of 69 reviews are positive, praising the welcoming campus, supportive community, and engaging staff. A small percentage (~3%) of negative feedback noted issues with lecture quality, unresponsive staff, and internet connectivity.
Most reviews praise the inspiring professors, practical learning, and international environment, contributing to a ~74% positive sentiment. One review expressed dissatisfaction, calling it a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
With a 4/5 average rating from one review, the feedback indicates a highly positive experience (~100% positive). The single review highlights supportive instructors and an enjoyable, educational course.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
Nothing to show
I was pleased by the Cambridge Campus, which is pretty lovely. Positives aside, lectures and seminars are of such terrible quality. I feel like I've wasted almost $30,000 and four years. Some of the teachers look careless since they don't reply to emails (of course there are a few good ones as well). The number of students using the internet is too high, and it crashed during an exam, creating issues and unneeded stress. My schedule was still incorrect after three months of study, 90% of my classmates and I didn't have all the modules on our ARU websites, and the grades were supposed to be cleared and published two months before but still hadn't been. Nobody seems to have an explanation or knowledge of the cause of the delays when you query the staff about them. Simply put, this is disorganized.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
