Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University - TSU vs Polytechnic University Institute Bamenda - NPB vs University of Bamenda - Uba vs Product School vs Medical University of Lodz - UMED

Side-by-side comparison from 49 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Polytechnic University Institute Bamenda - NPB (4.80)
Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University - TSU: wins 2/7 categories
Polytechnic University Institute Bamenda - NPB: wins 0/7 categories
University of Bamenda - Uba: wins 0/7 categories
Product School: wins 0/7 categories
Medical University of Lodz - UMED: wins 5/7 categories
Catholic University of Cameroon: wins 0/7 categories
Saint Louis University - Salusis: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
San Francisco, California, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: General Medicine
Category ratings
Facilities
3.00
Not rated
3.60
Not rated
4.33
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.25
Win
Not rated
3.93
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.38
Win
Not rated
4.19
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
3.76
Not rated
3.81
Not rated
4.67
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
3.57
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
4.50
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.14
Not rated
4.19
Not rated
4.33
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.30
Not rated
3.75
Not rated
4.33
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Valued knowledge and practical experience gained.
  • +Appreciated knowledgeable and supportive professors and academic environment.
  • +Enjoyed diverse student community and engaging student life.
  • +Supportive and skilled staff providing academic and social guidance
  • +High-quality teaching and enthusiastic professors
  • +Affordable tuition and practical internship support
  • +Dedicated lecturers and strong academic programs
  • +Engaging learning environment with hands-on projects and extracurriculars
  • +Friendly, diverse atmosphere promoting culture and socialization

Nothing to show

  • +Strong theoretical foundations and well-prepared medical courses
  • +Good communication and supportive teachers with small group learning
  • +Opportunities for extracurricular activities and an English-language program

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning experiences.
  • -Course content is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of practical application and unclear career relevance is a concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Communication problems and poor faculty engagement are major concerns.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated study programs and irrelevant content.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution receives a mixed but generally positive review, with its strongest performances in **Professors** (4.38) and **Location** (4.25). **Value** also scores well at 4.14. The weakest areas, requiring attention, are **Facilities** at 3 and **Student Life** at 3.57. Accommodation and Internationality fall within the mid-range of ratings.

With identical ratings across all assessed categories, the university presents a uniform, though unexceptional, profile. No specific area stands out as particularly strong or weak. The institution's performance in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value is consistent, indicating a neutral standing across the board. Further review would be needed to understand the nuances behind these equal scores.

This institution presents a varied performance profile, with Student Life standing out as its strongest area, achieving a score of 4.33. Professors and Value also scored highly at 4.19. Conversely, Facilities received the lowest rating at 3.6, indicating this might be an area for improvement. Other aspects like Location, Internationality, and Accommodation fall within a respectable middle range.

Nothing to show

This institution garners strong reviews, particularly excelling in **Internationality** with a score of 4.67, and **Student Life** at 4.5. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Accomodation, and Value are consistently high, all around 4.33. The lowest rated aspect, though still solid, is **Location** at 4.0. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded and positively regarded experience for its students.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.3/5 from 23 reviews, ~91% express satisfaction. Students highly value the knowledge gained, positive learning experiences, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. No negative feedback was reported.

With a 4.75/5 average from 4 reviews, sentiment is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students praise staff encouragement, good professors, and teaching quality, highlighting opportunities for academic and social growth.

With a 4.25/5 average rating, ~94% of reviews are positive. Students highlight strong academic programs and collaborative lecturers. Minor concerns mentioned include infrastructure and administrative issues.

Nothing to show

With ~83% positive sentiment (4-5 stars), reviewers highlight good teaching, communication, and opportunities for learning and student life. A small portion (~17%) found the study program outdated and some material unhelpful.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
43%
75%
38%
0%
50%
0%
0%
4★
43%
25%
50%
0%
33%
0%
0%
3★
13%
0%
13%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
17%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
An average university

The university offers a basic education with standard facilities. The classrooms, labs, and libraries are functional but not impressive. The teachers are experienced and provide solid instruction, though there isn’t much advanced research or unique insight. Students get a good foundation in medical basics, but the university doesn’t have special programs or standout features. Clinical training is limited, and students may miss out on specialized rotations or advanced practices. Support services like academic advising and career counseling are not available. Campus life is average, with typical student activities and organizations. Overall, the university provides a reliable, straightforward education. It’s a good choice for those looking for a dependable path to becoming a healthcare professional without extra features or exceptional opportunities.

Low tuition fees university

Affordable university and here if you are not able to have a place for practical work internship, the school can help you with an internship placement at any of the available companies in the region. Also, i was able to learn a new language ( French ).

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close