London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs ONCAMPUS Global vs Kingston University - KU vs Keele University - KLE vs Teesside University

Side-by-side comparison from 531 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: London Academy of Trading - LAT (5.00)
London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE: wins 0/7 categories
ONCAMPUS Global: wins 0/7 categories
Kingston University - KU: wins 0/7 categories
Keele University - KLE: wins 0/7 categories
Teesside University: wins 0/7 categories
London Academy of Trading - LAT: wins 7/7 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics
London, The United Kingdom
4.80
Read more reviews
21 reviews
×
Best programme: Undergraduate Foundation Programme
London, The United Kingdom
4.20
Read more reviews
81 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Management and Marketing
Keele, The United Kingdom
4.30
Read more reviews
39 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Science
Middlesbrough, The United Kingdom
4.40
Read more reviews
51 reviews
×
Best programme: Applied Artificial Intelligence and Data Analytics
London, The United Kingdom
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Advanced Trading Course
Best programme: Culinary Arts
Category ratings
Facilities
4.05
4.44
4.16
4.32
4.47
5.00
Win
4.40
Location
4.78
4.75
4.06
4.15
4.12
5.00
Win
4.70
Professors
4.26
4.76
4.12
4.46
4.27
5.00
Win
4.60
Internationality
4.80
4.62
4.30
4.43
4.29
5.00
Win
4.60
Student life
3.65
4.58
3.89
4.61
4.14
5.00
Win
3.90
Value
4.05
4.52
4.07
4.34
4.18
5.00
Win
3.90
Accommodation
3.80
4.35
3.60
4.17
3.83
4.50
Win
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty
  • +High-quality academic programs and clear feedback
  • +Excellent facilities and resources
  • +Supportive and approachable teachers
  • +Excellent student support services
  • +Convenient campus location and facilities
  • +Engaging and supportive faculty.
  • +Practical, real-world focused curriculum.
  • +Vibrant campus life and location.
  • +Diverse student body and wide course variety
  • +Strong program-specific academic support and practical training
  • +Welcoming campus environment with extracurricular activities
  • +Accessible and supportive lecturers
  • +Practical, industry-focused programs with career support
  • +Affordable and supportive city environment
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable tutors
  • +Engaging daily webinars with market analysis
  • +Improved trading profitability and understanding
  • +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
  • +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
  • +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
Cons
  • -Poor teaching quality and unstructured courses.
  • -High fees combined with lack of support and career services.
  • -Limited social life and judgmental environment.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and lack of clear communication are frustrating.
  • -Limited resources and support for academic needs are a concern.
  • -Administrative & management issues, including a lack of student support and disorganization.
  • -Inexperienced teachers and professors who seem uncaring about student progress.
  • -Lack of resources and scattered course structure negatively impact learning.
  • -Administrative & management issues often cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -Limited career services and poor job prospects are a major concern.
  • -Lack of lecturer and student care support
  • -Poor educational facilities and professor knowledge
  • -Unsafe campus environment due to high crime rates
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of engagement and uninspired teaching methods are disliked.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
  • -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
Rating summary
What students say

Examining the university's performance reveals a diverse set of scores. The strongest areas are **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving very high marks. **Student Life** stands out as the weakest performing category. Other areas like **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Facilities** received solid, above-average ratings, with **Value** also scoring positively.

This institution garners strong approval across multiple aspects, with particularly high marks for its **Professors (4.76)** and **Location (4.75)**. Student life and internationality also score well, above 4.5. **Accommodations (4.35)** received the lowest rating, though still generally positive, while facilities and value demonstrate solid, above-average performance.

Internationality stands out as the highest-rated aspect, reflecting a strong global presence. Facilities and professors also received commendable scores. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest area, scoring considerably lower than other categories. Student life and value for money fall within a moderate range, with location also performing well but not reaching the highest tiers.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its academic and international offerings, with Professors and Internationality receiving particularly high scores. Student Life and Facilities are also well-regarded. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as a weaker area, with a significantly lower rating compared to other aspects. The university also fares well in Value and Location, indicating a generally positive overall experience.

This university garners its highest marks for **Facilities**, achieving a score of 4.47. **Professors** and **Internationality** also stand out with scores above 4.25. In contrast, **Accomodation** receives the lowest rating at 3.83. Other areas like **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Value** are rated competently between 4.12 and 4.18.

Across numerous metrics, this institution demonstrates exceptional strengths. Facilities, professors, location, student life, and internationality all garnered perfect scores, indicating outstanding offerings in these domains. The sole area falling slightly short, though still very strong, is accommodation at 4.5 stars, suggesting a minor area for potential enhancement compared to its otherwise flawless performance.

This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 96.6% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable professors, supportive learning environments, and strong academic reputations. A small percentage (around 3.4%) of negative feedback cites issues with lecturing, grading, and course structure.

All 21 reviews are positive, averaging 4.76/5 stars. Students frequently praised helpful teachers, strong academic support, and good facilities. Some also highlighted a positive transition experience and newfound confidence.

The vast majority of reviews (~74%) highlight Kingston University's strong learning environment, knowledgeable lecturers, and relevant course content. A small percentage (~2.5%) of feedback mentioned issues with management and resources.

The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (~97%), with students praising its diverse student body, varied courses, and supportive learning environment. Specific programs like Computer Science and Nursing are highlighted for strong academics and practical training. No negative reviews were recorded.

Approximately 96% of reviews are positive, highlighting accessible lecturers, supportive careers services, and enjoyable city life. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions a lack of lecturer support and concerns about local safety.

Both reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Key highlights include excellent tutors, engaging daily webinars, and improved trading profitability. Students appreciated the supportive learning environment that clarified market understanding.

Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.

Rating distribution
5★
34%
76%
40%
36%
55%
100%
60%
4★
44%
24%
42%
62%
35%
0%
40%
3★
18%
0%
16%
3%
6%
0%
0%
2★
2%
0%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
0%
0%
0%
4%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Great Experience

LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.

Nothing to show

Human Geography

The course and it's syllabus can be super interesting and fun but most of the lecturers are trash. They show no enthusiasm to teach and deliver lectures as if they were eulogies. Which is a shame, I feel the only thing holding back KU is the lack of enthusiasm.

Nothing to show

Excellent study place

The approachable teachers and the facilities are top-notch. The majority of my studies were during COVID-19 so student life can't be assessed. Accommodations in Middlebrough are cheap and very affordable when compared to other places and other universities. The course modules were very helpful except for 3D interactive visualization which I really don't think is applicable as a data scientist and can be replaced with SQL instead.

Nothing to show

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close