EU Business School vs WHU - Otto Beisheim School of Management vs IU International University of Applied Sciences vs University of Kiel vs University of Applied Sciences Kiel - FH KIEL
Side-by-side comparison from 384 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Helpful professors and career support
- +Valuable practical and theoretical business knowledge
- +Enriching overall student experience
- +Excellent faculty and practical learning experiences
- +International exposure and real-world business cases
- +Engaging program with opportunities for skill development and creativity
- +Flexible online study for work-life balance
- +Modern, intuitive digital platform for easy access
- +Relevant, high-quality educational content
- +Rigorous chemistry foundation prepares for advanced studies.
- +Practical and theoretical learning through well-designed curricula.
- +Strong emphasis on job-relevant skills and future career prospects.
- +Opportunities for international and multicultural exposure.
- +Integrated business and technology education for practical application.
- +Small class sizes and personal lecturer/staff interaction.
- +Strong focus on entrepreneurship and innovation.
- +Practical, career-focused learning
- +Supportive professors
- +Challenging workload
- -Administrative and management issues cause disorganization and lack of support.
- -Outdated facilities and a focus on attendance over quality education are criticized.
- -The educational program is perceived as basic and unaccredited in some regions.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are consistently criticized.
- -Slow and unresponsive administrative processes, including grade processing and student support.
- -Poor staff attitude and lack of accountability for errors in student records and applications.
- -Inadequate support and guidance for online students.
- -Lack of support for international students and a significant language barrier.
- -Social science programs are underdeveloped.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a frequent complaint.
- -Students express dissatisfaction with administrative inefficiencies and poor communication.
- -The curriculum is often described as irrelevant or lacking practical application.
- -Administrative and management issues are a major source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are recurring complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of transparency are recurring problems.
This institution excels in several key areas, with Location and Internationality receiving the highest marks at 4.73. Student Life also scores well at 4.22. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring 3.42, suggesting room for improvement. Facilities and Professors are rated consistently around 4.04, while Value sits at a respectable 3.87.
Overall, this university garners very positive feedback. Its strongest aspects include excellent Facilities, Professors, and Location, all scoring a high 4.5. Value is also rated highly at 4.5. Areas with slightly lower scores are Student Life and Internationality, both at 3.5. Accommodations received a solid 4.
This institution garners notable praise in several key areas, with **Internationality** and **Professors** receiving particularly high scores. The **Value** proposition is also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the lowest-rated aspect. Other aspects like Facilities, Location, and Student Life fall within a more moderate range of positive feedback.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in its facilities, earning a respectable 3.5 out of 5. Conversely, areas requiring improvement include accommodation, rated at a low 2, and professors, location, and student life, all scoring 2.5. While internationality is rated moderately at 3, the university's value for money stands out as its strongest attribute, achieving a high 4.
Considering the provided ratings, the university presents a uniformly neutral profile, with no specific areas standing out as particularly strong or weak. Every surveyed aspect, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, received a rating of zero. This suggests a consistent, albeit unremarkable, performance across all evaluated facets of the university experience.
This institution garners exceptional ratings in several key areas. Professors and accommodation stand out with perfect scores, indicating a highly valued academic staff and excellent housing options. Student life and facilities also received near-perfect marks, suggesting a vibrant campus environment and well-equipped resources. Conversely, internationality and value represent the weaker aspects, with ratings of 4.4, suggesting potential areas for enhancement in global engagement and affordability.
Across all assessed metrics, this institution achieves a perfect score of 5 out of 5. Every aspect, from its modern facilities and distinguished professors to its vibrant student life and advantageous location, is rated exceptionally. Furthermore, the accommodation options, international atmosphere, and overall value for money are all considered outstanding. There are no apparent weakest areas, with uniformly excellent feedback.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, praising professors, career services, and valuable skills gained. The remaining ~7.6% of feedback expresses concerns about disorganization and the quality of education.
The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (100% positive reviews) with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students highlight experienced professors, a strong mix of theory and practical application, and enjoyable staff and fellow students.
~95% of reviews are positive, praising flexibility, modern platforms, and accessible materials. A small percentage (~5%) mention issues with grading delays and slow administrative support.
With a 2.5/5 average rating from two reviews, sentiment is split evenly. One reviewer highlights challenging but rewarding chemistry studies, while the other notes shortcomings in social sciences and minimal support for international students.
Students highlight excellent laboratory facilities, a well-designed curriculum for practical and job-related knowledge, and good international exposure. The average rating is 4/5, with positive feedback representing 100% of reviews.
All 6 reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5 stars. Students highlight the strong focus on technology and entrepreneurship, practical learning, and a welcoming atmosphere. No negative feedback was reported.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, students highly recommend HAW Kiel, praising its practical, career-focused approach and engaging professors. There is no negative feedback.
As far as universities go I think EU business school comes first in terms of student-staff relationship. Every member of the staff I have encountered has been more than helpful. What i think should improve as even tho its not connected to my previous point is I think the school should have more leniency towards tuition payment specially to international students because we are here despite the challenges of having to find willing banks to exchange local currencies to Euros.
Amazing program, it provides the perfect blend and opportunity to learn skills and also explore your creativity. Most professors are very experienced and well known within their field of expertise. Some are outstanding and provide you with great knowledge. There is a lot of emphases given to practical learning and group projects. WHU staff, as well as students, were good fun.
My experience with IU is very wonderful and exceptional. The learning process is smooth and easy especially for online students and the exams are well tailored to test your knowledge on what you have been learning. It is quite great indeed.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This was the best Varsity ever. The professionalism is on the high level. I have no dislikes and I highly recommend it to people who are struggling with focus. It's takes special students with disabilities.
Nothing to show
