London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs ONCAMPUS Global vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs Newcastle University vs Northumbria University
Side-by-side comparison from 617 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty
- +High-quality academic programs and clear feedback
- +Excellent facilities and resources
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
- +Excellent facilities and convenient location
- +Strong academic and personal development support
- +Practical, industry-relevant courses and inspiring professors
- +Rich international environment and diverse student body
- +Personal and professional development opportunities
- +Excellent academic programmes and dedicated professor support
- +Strong careers support and practical skill development
- +Vibrant student life with diverse societies and social opportunities
- +Engaging, hands-on learning and career readiness
- +Strong student support and guidance
- +Welcoming community and social opportunities
- +Strong academic programs with real-world application
- +Passionate and supportive professors
- +Practical skill development and well-structured curriculum
Nothing to show
- -Poor teaching quality and unstructured courses.
- -High fees combined with lack of support and career services.
- -Limited social life and judgmental environment.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep frustrate students.
- -Lack of resources and inadequate support services are common complaints.
- -Financial concerns and perceived low educational value.
- -Lack of academic and personal support
- -Minimal resources and effort from support teams
- -Perception of being a "money grab"
- -Outdated and impractical program structures offering little specialization.
- -Lack of practical application and insufficient teaching of job-relevant skills.
- -Unsupportive and uninspiring teaching staff.
- -Administrative & management issues
- -Outdated facilities & poor technology
- -Lack of career support & guidance
Nothing to show
Examining the university's performance reveals a diverse set of scores. The strongest areas are **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving very high marks. **Student Life** stands out as the weakest performing category. Other areas like **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Facilities** received solid, above-average ratings, with **Value** also scoring positively.
Overall, the university garners strong ratings across various aspects. Professors are exceptionally well-regarded, achieving the highest score. Location and Internationality also stand out with excellent marks. Student Life, Facilities, and Value also reflect positive sentiment. Accommodation, while still strong, receives the lowest rating among the surveyed categories.
This institution garners excellent marks in several key areas. Facilities, Professors, Internationality, and Value all received high scores of 4.125. Student Life and Accommodations are rated lower, at 3.625 and approximately 3.57 respectively, indicating these are areas with more room for improvement compared to its other strengths. The Location score sits at 3.75.
This university presents a strong showing, particularly excelling in **Location** with a rating of 4.75 and **Student Life** at 4.69. Facilities also received a very favorable score of 4.52. The weakest area appears to be **Value**, scoring 4.11, though most other categories, including Professors, Accommodation, and Internationality, also hover around the 4.2 to 4.3 mark, indicating a generally positive, albeit slightly less exceptional, performance.
This university receives its highest praise for its **location**, followed closely by **student life** and **facilities**. Areas scoring a bit lower, though still respectable, include **accommodation** and **value**. The university demonstrates a solid performance across most metrics, with professors and internationality also scoring favorably.
This university garners strong marks across multiple facets. Its strongest areas are Location and Student Life, both scoring an impressive 4.53. Facilities and Internationality also perform very well, each at 4.47. On the other hand, Accomodation and Value received slightly lower, though still solid, scores of 4.12 and 4.18 respectively. Professors are rated highly at 4.24, rounding out a generally positive assessment.
Nothing to show
Approximately 96.6% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable professors, supportive learning environments, and strong academic reputations. A small percentage (around 3.4%) of negative feedback cites issues with lecturing, grading, and course structure.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% of 20 feedback entries rating 4–5 stars. Students praise friendly, supportive teachers, excellent facilities like the library, and effective student support services that build confidence.
Most reviews praise the inspiring professors, practical learning, and international environment, contributing to a ~74% positive sentiment. One review expressed dissatisfaction, calling it a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
With an average rating of 4.38/5 from 135 reviews, ~92% of feedback is positive. Students praise excellent societies, sports, career support, and academics, while a small amount (~0.7%) of negative feedback mentioned limited master's level support.
Approximately 94.5% of reviews are positive, highlighting welcome initiatives, diverse programs, and helpful advisors. A small portion of feedback (~5.5%) criticizes program structure and career relevance.
Most reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 4.35/5. Students praise academic excellence, real-world application, passionate professors, and well-structured, practical programs. No negative feedback was reported.
Nothing to show
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The facilities of the school of computing are great - very modern building, newest equipment, campus located in the city centre (most likely you don’t need to commute there by metro or a bus). One major thing however that is lacking is the organisation. Being a third-year student I still have the same feeling - the program is written very chaotically. In 2019 there was that revolution of the programme (to keep learning the newest technology) to which lectures and demonstrators still feel a bit unadapted. I hope this will get better in the next year or two years. However, after that time, the taught technology may change again (which is good) and it will take another couple of years for the lecturers to be fluent in what they teaching (which is not good).
Overall, my time at Northumbria was ok. Not great just ok. My time was influenced by the COVID outbreak and so my final year was all online. Through my second and final year there was a lack of support from tutors. Not only that I had extenuating circumstances which were ignored when appealing my final grade.
Reading about the school, I was impressed by the attention they claim to give the students, their ranking amongst top universities and the business school facilitators plus the partnering bodies. I was also intrigued by the data lab and how their research are always towards the betterment of society and humanity. I was not shocked to resume school and see all these, first hand; I am proud to be part of NUBS story! The classrooms are standard and environmentally friendly, the campus is aesthetically beautiful and has a story to tell. The reception is almost like a friendly work station and I love how my desk replicates an office setting making me feel at home and not like a child resuming school. I resumed late and had my supervisors and students helping me catch up with a friendly team that I could reach out to without fear or remorse. It sure is a great place to school and work.
Nothing to show
