Vilnius University vs Vilnius Tech vs Vilnius University of Applied Sciences - VIKO vs Mykolas Romeris University - MRU vs SMK College of Applied Sciences - SMK
Side-by-side comparison from 261 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Quality education, experienced and supportive lecturers
- +Welcoming and international learning environment
- +Student-friendly location and affordability
- +Practical, future-oriented programs and strong academic curriculum
- +Inspiring, collaborative environment and creative innovation focus
- +Supportive professors, clear explanations, and useful, relevant subjects
- +Practical, applied learning focused on real-world skills
- +Supportive and knowledgeable teaching staff
- +Opportunities for success and career preparation
- +Welcoming international environment and diverse student body
- +Knowledgeable and supportive professors
- +Practical, skill-focused learning opportunities
- +Supportive and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Modern study environment and facilities
- +Balance of theory and practical, real-world application
Nothing to show
- +Expert and recognized faculty
- +Relevant and modern curriculum
- +Practical business applications
- -Administrative & management issues are a major frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment detract from the learning experience.
- -The lack of career support and practical opportunities is disappointing.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of support and resources impacts student experience.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
- -The curriculum and teaching methods are often perceived as ineffective or irrelevant.
- -Lack of adequate support and guidance from professors
- -Unrealistic and overwhelming initial course expectations
- -Poor quality of facilities, particularly dormitories
- -Outdated facilities and limited resources are a significant drawback.
- -The university suffers from administrative inefficiencies and poor management.
- -A lack of course variety and limited English-taught programs are disappointing.
Nothing to show
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Students are unhappy with outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
- -Students find the curriculum to be unengaging and irrelevant.
With an average rating of 4.36, this institution excels particularly in the areas of **Professors** and **Location**, both scoring an impressive 4.6. **Value** also received a strong rating of 4.6. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower score of 3.7. Other categories like Facilities, Student Life, and Internationality received solid ratings in the mid-4s.
This institution demonstrates commendable strengths, particularly in its **Location**, receiving the highest rating. **Student Life** also scores very favorably. While all aspects are well-regarded, **Accomodation** received the lowest score among the assessed areas, indicating room for improvement in that specific category. Overall, the university presents a solid offering with distinct highlights.
This institution demonstrates strong performance in several key areas, with Student Life and Location receiving particularly high marks. Facilities and Internationality also rank very favorably. While Accomodation is rated lower than other categories, it remains a solid score, indicating an overall positive university experience. Professors' ratings, while good, are the lowest among the surveyed aspects.
This institution excels in student life and internationality, both scoring a high 4.45. Location also received a strong rating of 4.42. Accommodation is the lowest-rated area at 4.07, though other aspects like facilities, professors, and value remain solidly above 4.0.
Overall, the university garners positive feedback, with location and student life receiving particularly high marks. Facilities and internationality are also rated strongly. Areas for improvement are accommodation, which is the weakest aspect, and value, which is moderately rated. Professors and facilities also show solid scores, contributing to a generally favorable university experience.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates a solid performance with notable strengths in its **Professors** and **Internationality**, both receiving a strong 4-star rating. The university offers a more average experience in **Facilities**, **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Accomodation**, each scoring 3 stars. The overall **Value** is rated at a respectable 3.5 stars, suggesting a good return for students.
With an average rating of 4.62/5 from 146 reviews, ~93% of feedback is positive, highlighting academic reputation, quality education, an international environment, and supportive staff. Minimal negative feedback (~0.7%) was noted.
University reviews are highly positive, with ~100% giving 4-5 stars and an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise well-structured, future-oriented programs, practical applications, and excellent academic facilities.
With an average rating of 4.47/5 from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive. Students highlight the practical curriculum, supportive faculty, and opportunities for success. No negative reviews were provided.
With a 4.39 average rating from 28 reviews, ~96% are positive, highlighting a welcoming international environment, supportive professors, and practical learning. A small ~4% of feedback mentioned some programs needing improvement for challenging, research-focused study.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting approachable lecturers, practical skills focus, and modern facilities. A single negative review (~3.7%) mentioned the institution being small.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.5/5, university students report positive experiences, highlighting professional and knowledgeable lecturers. The curriculum is noted as modern, relevant, and offering practical business applications. No negative feedback was received.
For me, Vilnius University is well known & best University in whole Europe. Many international students are studying here.They are really making friendly rules for EU students though which is not applicable for Non EU students.There are lot of students from Asia & Africa continent's.As we know meximum things are different in these continent's, so they are facing huge problems after coming here for every case. In abroad, I think University's are like a family for us, so they should make some rules for us, which can release our academic & mental pressure, such as academic leave for a semester or a year.Now we can take the academic leave though I don’t think It’s the perfect way for non Eu students. So I am requesting that Universities should consider these matters for Non Eu students. Without these I love my University.
VGTU is one of the best technical universities in Lithuania. They provide many field of studies for students and good environemnet for studies at all. Moreover, its International office provides many opportunities to study or doing internship abroad, thus have cooperation with many international universities around the world. Thanks to VGTU, I got a summer internship 2019 in Belgium and received good feedback there and, at the moment, I am studying in Estonia by bilateral agreement. I especially want to note teachers staff of the department where I study. They are good specialists and share necessary experience during lectures which can be useful for the future job. Furthermore, sometimes they send us actual vacancies and give recommendations to some companies who are ready to consider students' applications. For me personally this university "opened a window of life". I have met a lot of people from other countries, learned new things and got valuable life experience.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I am currently studying in the Tourism and Recreation programme and have completed four semesters. Overall, my experience at SMK College of Applied Sciences has been positive. The programme combines theoretical knowledge with practical activities, helping students understand how the tourism and recreation industry works in real-life situations. The lecturers are generally supportive and willing to help students when needed. Classes cover a variety of topics related to tourism, hospitality, recreation, and business, which provides a broad understanding of the field. I also appreciate the opportunity to work on projects and assignments that encourage teamwork and problem-solving skills. The college has an international environment, allowing students to meet people from different countries and cultures. This makes studying more interesting and helps improve communication skills. One area that could be improved is the organization of some administrative processes, which can occasionally take longer than expected. However, this has not significantly affected my studies. I would recommend SMK College of Applied Sciences to students who are interested in tourism and recreation and are looking for a practical, career-oriented study programme.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
