University of Calabar - UNICAL vs Lahore University of Management Sciences - LUMS vs Kazakh-British Technical University - KBTU vs Arthur Jarvis University - AJU vs Cross River University of Technology - Crutech

Side-by-side comparison from 370 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: College of Health Technology - COHTECH (5.00)
University of Calabar - UNICAL: wins 0/7 categories
Lahore University of Management Sciences - LUMS: wins 0/7 categories
Kazakh-British Technical University - KBTU: wins 3/7 categories
Arthur Jarvis University - AJU: wins 0/7 categories
Cross River University of Technology - Crutech: wins 0/7 categories
Dow University of Health Sciences - DUHS: wins 0/7 categories
College of Health Technology - COHTECH: wins 4/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Medicine and Surgery
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Computer Science
Best programme: Computer Science
Best programme: Computer Science
Best programme: Bachelor of Medicine
Best programme: Community Health
Category ratings
Facilities
2.95
4.44
5.00
Win
3.43
3.69
4.20
4.00
Location
3.90
4.50
4.50
2.83
3.73
4.80
5.00
Win
Professors
3.47
4.00
4.50
Win
3.71
4.00
4.20
4.00
Internationality
2.96
3.60
4.50
Win
3.43
3.62
4.10
4.00
Student life
3.50
4.58
4.50
3.43
3.75
4.44
5.00
Win
Value
3.50
4.17
4.50
3.86
3.92
4.40
5.00
Win
Accommodation
2.99
3.76
4.50
3.57
3.72
3.78
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Dedicated and knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Strong academic foundation and relevant course content
  • +Encouragement of discipline, resilience, and personal growth
  • +Critical thinking and intellectual freedom
  • +Rigorous academics and competitive environment
  • +Supportive faculty and comprehensive programmes
  • +Strong academic foundation and competitive programming opportunities
  • +Engaging lecturers & supportive learning environment
  • +Value for money & extensive extracurricular opportunities
  • +Good facilities & conducive accommodation
  • +Academic excellence and strong research emphasis
  • +Focus on innovation and practical skills
  • +Entrepreneurship and shaping students for the secular world
  • +Excellent academic faculty and teaching quality.
  • +Superior infrastructure and facilities for learning.
  • +Abundant opportunities and practical experience.
  • +Engaging learning activities, positive environment, and excellent lectures.
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues contribute to corruption and injustice.
  • -Poor academic standards and lack of lecturer engagement hinder learning.
  • -Outdated and unkept facilities negatively impact the learning environment.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of practical application and relevance in coursework is a concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Inflexible policies and lack of support are problematic.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
  • -Poor administrative support and unclear communication.
  • -Lack of engagement and relevance in coursework.
  • -Inadequate security and frequent attacks by external groups.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance detract from the learning environment.
  • -Overcrowded classes and lack of individual attention are frequently criticized.
  • -Ineffective and outdated teaching methods are a recurring concern.
  • -The institution suffers from poor administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are frequently mentioned.
Rating summary
What students say

Overall, the university demonstrates a solid performance, with **Location** standing out as its strongest asset, achieving a score of 3.89. Student life and faculty also received favorable ratings. Conversely, **Facilities** and **Internationality** were identified as areas for improvement, with lower scores. The university offers a reasonable value proposition, supported by a decent student life and professor quality.

With impressive scores in several areas, this institution excels particularly in **Student Life** and **Location**, both receiving marks above 4.5. **Facilities** also score highly. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Internationality** are the areas needing the most improvement, with ratings of 3.76 and 3.6 respectively. **Professors** and **Value** fall comfortably in the middle range of the provided data.

This institution achieves outstanding marks across nearly all aspects, with a perfect score in **Facilities** setting it apart. Student life, professors, location, accommodation, and internationality are all highly rated at 4.5. The university also presents a strong **Value** proposition at the same mark. With no significantly weak areas identified, the ratings paint a picture of a well-rounded and desirable educational environment.

This university receives strong marks for **Value**, its highest rated category. Professors are also highly regarded. Conversely, **Location** is identified as the weakest area. Other categories like Facilities, Student Life, Accommodation, and Internationality also show solid performance, indicating a generally well-rounded experience for students.

This university garners a strong overall impression, with particular praise for its Professors, who received a perfect score. Value for money also ranks highly. Conversely, Internationality received the lowest rating among the surveyed categories. Facilities, Location, Student Life, and Accomodation all achieved solid mid-range scores, indicating a generally positive student experience.

This institution earns high marks in several key areas. Its location is particularly outstanding, with a near-perfect score. Student life and value also received positive feedback, alongside solid ratings for facilities and internationality. Conversely, accommodation appears to be the weakest area, suggesting room for improvement in student housing options.

This university garners exceptionally high marks, particularly excelling in its Location, Student Life, Accomodation, and Value, all receiving a perfect score. Professors and Facilities are also highly rated at 4. Internationality is similarly strong with a score of 4. The weakest area, though still a strong score, is Facilities at 4.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, citing dedicated lecturers and relevant content. The remaining ~16% of negative feedback highlights issues like slow administration, limited facilities, and academic calendar delays.

Nearly all (91%) student reviews praise LUMS for its transformative education, critical thinking encouragement, and supportive faculty. Students value the demanding academics and diverse campus community, finding the experience rewarding despite challenges. No negative feedback was recorded.

With an average rating of 4/5 from two reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Students highlight strong programming foundations and active participation in competitive olympiads. No negative feedback was received.

With 5 out of 7 reviews being positive (~74%), students generally highlight a positive learning environment with dedicated lecturers and good facilities. Minor concerns about electricity stability were noted.

~83% of reviews are positive, highlighting academic excellence, well-equipped facilities, and practical skill development. Just ~1.5% express concerns about school security.

With a ~90% positive sentiment, reviews highlight excellent infrastructure and top-notch faculty. Students appreciate practical experience and a supportive environment. A minor concern about examination scheduling was noted.

With one review received, the university earns a perfect 5/5 average rating. The single review was positive, highlighting great learning activities, environment, and lectures.

Rating distribution
5★
17%
57%
50%
0%
20%
20%
100%
4★
27%
31%
0%
71%
64%
70%
0%
3★
40%
11%
50%
29%
15%
10%
0%
2★
11%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
5%
0%
0%
0%
2%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
My school experience

This esteemed institution excels in academic performance, particularly in technology. Its top-notch programs in Cyber Security, Telecommunications Engineering, and Robotics Engineering are highly regarded. With a strong focus on innovation and practical learning, students are equipped with the skills and knowledge to succeed in their chosen fields. The institution's faculty comprises experienced professionals and researchers who provide mentorship and guidance. State-of-the-art facilities and cutting-edge technology enable students to explore and experiment with the latest advancements. Collaborations with industry partners and research centers further enhance the learning experience. Graduates from this institution are highly sought after by top tech companies and organizations. They possess a deep understanding of theoretical concepts and practical applications, making them valuable assets in the workforce. The institution's commitment to excellence and innovation has earned it a reputation as a leader in technology education. With its rigorous academic programs and emphasis on hands-on learning, this institution prepares students for successful careers in tech. Its strong alumni network and industry connections open doors to exciting opportunities, enabling graduates to make a meaningful impact in their chosen fields.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

My Experience At Arthur Jarvis

I have been a student of Arthur Jarvis University for close to a year,I transferred from a public University down here cause of all the drawbacks our public education system has. So my few months in this new environment hasn't been as great as I thought it would,the education and teaching is really top tier but where the school fails to impress is lack of other means of entertainment for her students,there's literally nothing else to do rather than sports in the evenings,no events of any kind and a lot of restrictions. It makes staying on campus really boring and tiring. Hopefully things would change in the nearest future.

Teaching

This university has high standard lecturers/professors who have passion in teaching. They teach and carry all students along irrespective of your capacity or zeal in studies. I would like to recommend this school to students who want to come out doing well in life and feeling proud about their school.

Wonderful medical learning ambiance

Spending 8 9 hours a day, 6 days a week for 5 years makes a place your second home practically, due to which that region and its environment have a great impact on your essence, according to my incidents the entrance era for a year was extraordinary in terms of learning and development, teaching practice and faculty lived wonderfully. With the passing years as courses got complicated, I felt some of the faculty slightly got downhill. When it comes to the infrastructure, space facilities, and school buildings stood serviceable but it would have been great if there was another building for lecture halls (which is now constructed after I got graduated). Learning strategies could have been slightly better if field trips and practical exposure was discussed more than theory which supports fresh graduates in fetching reasonable job possibilities right after graduation.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close