Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso - UFMT vs University of Mkar - UMM vs Istituto Marangoni vs Qatar University vs Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Kakinada - JNTUK
Side-by-side comparison from 44 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Highly qualified and supportive faculty
- +Excellent infrastructure and resources, including a well-equipped hospital
- +Engaging and challenging academic programs with career-boosting opportunities
- +Supportive and disciplined academic environment
- +Values-driven education focus
- +Global fashion hub and career opportunities
- +Inspiring teachers and valuable learning experiences
- +Excellent academic programs and high-quality education
- +Valuable practical experience and real-life projects
- +Strong reputation, numerous opportunities, and qualified faculty
- +Strong academics and quality education
- +Supportive faculty and environment
- +Good career opportunities and skill development
- +International environment and diverse cultures
- +Practical, hands-on learning and industry connections
- +Supportive and approachable lecturers
Nothing to show
- -Poor infrastructure and lack of research support.
- -Unclear career path guidance.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Course content is often irrelevant or poorly delivered.
- -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Communication breakdowns and lack of transparency are significant problems.
- -Exclusionary practices and language barriers
- -Segregated facilities and programs
- -Poor faculty quality and blatant partiality.
- -Inconsistent and unfair paper valuation.
- -Poor staff attitude and a lack of care for students are significant issues.
- -Unfulfilled promises and misleading information create a negative student experience.
- -Inadequate facilities and miserable conditions contribute to dissatisfaction.
Nothing to show
Academics and campus experience are key strengths, with **Professors** and **Location** both scoring an excellent 4.6. **Facilities** and **Accomodation** also received solid ratings of 4 and 4.2 respectively. The university's **Internationality** stands out as its weakest area, receiving a 3.4, while **Student Life** is rated moderately at 3.8. Overall, the university offers good **Value** at 4.2.
This institution excels in **Location** and **Value**, both receiving perfect scores. Conversely, **Student Life** is a significant area for improvement, scoring a zero. Other aspects, including **Accomodation** and **Professors**, are rated moderately at 3. **Facilities** and **Internationality** received lower scores of 2, suggesting these could also benefit from development.
This institution shines particularly brightly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving excellent scores. **Professors** and **Value** also stand out as strong points. Conversely, the **Facilities** represent the weakest area, scoring considerably lower than other aspects. **Student Life** and **Accomodation** fall in the mid-range, indicating areas for potential improvement but also solid performance.
This institution excels in its **location**, boasting a near-perfect score. Facilities and professors also receive very strong marks. However, **student life** presents an area for potential improvement, scoring significantly lower than other categories. Accommodations, internationality, and value are rated favorably, though not reaching the same exceptional levels as location and academics.
The university performs strongly across multiple areas, with student life receiving the highest rating. Facilities and accommodation are also well-regarded. Value for money is a notable positive, alongside a good score for location. Internationality presents as the weakest area, though it still maintains a respectable rating. Professors are also rated favorably.
This institution receives its highest marks for Location, with a perfect score. Student Life and Internationality are also strong areas, both scoring above 4.0. Conversely, Value for Money is the lowest-rated aspect, followed by Facilities and Professors, which also received moderate scores. Accommodations fall in the middle range of ratings.
Nothing to show
University reviews are largely positive (~83%), praising exceptional faculty, good campus infrastructure, and career-boosting programs. A small percentage of feedback (~17%) notes issues with research environment and career paths.
The single review is overwhelmingly positive, giving a 5/5 rating. It highlights a peaceful, faith-based environment, supportive lecturers, and good academic growth. No negative feedback was received.
With a 3.67 average rating, positive feedback (~33%) highlights fashion business opportunities and inspiring teachers. No negative reviews were provided.
Seven out of ten reviews are positive, with students praising academic quality, opportunities, and practical learning. One review expressed concerns about exclusion due to language and program segregation.
With an average rating of 4.07/5, ~86% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong academics, faculty support, and good career opportunities. A small ~7% of feedback mentions issues with faculty and paper valuation in specific departments.
About 78% of reviews are positive, highlighting the international environment, practical approach, industry connections, and supportive lecturers. Two reviews (about 22%) express dissatisfaction with staff rudeness and perceived broken promises.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I like a lot of it but I feel like the subject teaches us the same every time. There should be more diversity in our contents and make us work more in groups and do more exercises in class, in order words the classes should be more dynamic
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
To be honest compared to other universities BHMS did not strike me as a great choice in the first place. However, the 2 semesters per year, where in the first one you study and in the second one you do an internship is a really great way of learning. I have gotten great opportunities and met many people here. I would like to highlight my professor; Mr. Marcel Enzler. He is an amazing lecturer who truly believes in his students and also tries to elevate the school to the best of his abilities. After doing my studies here for 3 years, I would like to see them make the first and second year curriculum fit the industry requirements and standards. Because they are very easy courses and once you are in third year you start struggling a lot. Other than that I immensely enjoyed my time here.
Nothing to show
