London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs Brunel University London vs University of Liverpool - UOL vs University of Bradford vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie
Side-by-side comparison from 652 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Expert and experienced faculty
- +Supportive and collaborative community atmosphere
- +Diverse and flexible learning and assessment methods
- +Practical, career-focused learning with industry relevance
- +Supportive and engaging teaching staff
- +Accessible campus and useful resources
- +Strong academic reputation and research
- +Supportive lecturers and active learning environment
- +Lively campus and affordable city location
- +Strong academic programmes and valuable knowledge acquisition.
- +Excellent student support services and approachable staff.
- +Inclusive and diverse student community.
- +Connecting theory to practice through real-world cases.
- +Diverse international environment and global opportunities.
- +Relevant industry-focused courses and knowledgeable faculty.
- +Engaging courses and attentive, helpful staff
- +Rewarding academic experience
- +Convenient location with nearby amenities
- +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
- +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
- +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of structure in academic programs.
- -Inadequate support services and limited social opportunities.
- -High fees with perceived low value and administrative issues.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
- -Outdated course content and confusing teaching methods are frustrating.
- -Poor communication and lack of professionalism are prevalent.
- -Lack of academic and career support
- -Poor quality of teaching and resources
- -Lack of student support and unresponsiveness from staff.
- -Disorganization and administrative issues.
- -Limited learning or academic value.
- -Perceived as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources hinder learning.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.
Perceived strengths of this institution lie significantly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving top marks. Conversely, **Student Life** emerges as the area with the lowest reported satisfaction. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Accomodation, and Value fall within a moderate to good range, indicating generally positive feedback across these aspects.
This institution garners a strong overall rating, particularly excelling in **Internationality** with a score of 4.33. **Professors** and **Value** also receive high marks. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Location** present the weakest areas, scoring 3.61 and 3.72 respectively. Facilities, student life, and professors all fall within a commendable 3.8 to 4.0 range.
This university generally receives favorable ratings, with its strongest area being **Location** (4.53), followed closely by **Student Life** (4.43). **Professors** also scored well (4.35). The lowest rated aspect is **Accomodation** (4.19), though it still maintains a positive score. Other areas like Facilities, Internationality, and Value are all rated in the 4.2 range, indicating a consistently good overall experience.
This institution garners high marks in several key areas, notably **Internationality (4.5)**, followed closely by **Professors (4.40)** and **Facilities (4.24)**. Students also seem satisfied with the **Value (4.19)** and **Student Life (4.02)**. The lowest-rated aspect is **Location (3.85)**, suggesting this might be an area for potential improvement.
This institution performs well across most aspects, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive high marks. Areas for potential improvement include **Location**, which scored the lowest, and Accomodation. Student life and the overall value proposition are rated solidly in the mid-to-high range.
An analysis of the university's performance reveals strengths in its facilities, professors, internationality, and overall value, all receiving a solid 4 out of 5. Conversely, location, student life, and accommodation are areas for potential improvement, each scoring a 3. The institution offers a good balance, with notable academic and practical resources, though aspects related to student experience and place require attention.
This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.
Most reviews (~74%) are positive, praising academic reputation, expert faculty, and excellent resources. A small percentage (~3.4%) express dissatisfaction with lecturing quality, course structure, or career services.
Over 97% of reviews are positive, highlighting career-focused degrees, practical learning, and supportive lecturers. A small amount of negative feedback mentions visa issues and course content clarity.
The University of Liverpool is praised for its strong academics, research, and supportive environment (~93% positive). While most reviews highlight excellent teaching and campus life, minimal negative feedback points to some concerns regarding postgraduate research support.
Over 94% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent academic and student support, diverse and inclusive communities, and strong nursing programs. A small percentage (~5.5%) express dissatisfaction with disorganization and limited support.
Most reviews (approximately 71%) highlight a positive learning atmosphere, inspiring professors, and valuable international experiences. A small amount of feedback (around 14%) suggests mediocrity and a focus on profit. The average rating is 3.86/5.
With an average rating of 4/5 based on one review, this university is positively perceived (~100% positive). The single review highlights an engaging and rewarding experience with attentive staff and helpful professors, plus enjoyable classes.
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
Nothing to show
This is a great University which caters towards students of all kinds. The University is large and has an open campus which allows for ease of travel and access. It has a great community, and communication between peers and teachers is equally impressive. There is plenty of off sites and on-site accommodation which is modern and stylish and almost all of the accommodation is near to the city centre. Furthermore, the nightlife is excellent because of Liverpool's great city centre and surrounding areas.
My programme is taught by quality lecturers! everyone seems to be very supportive and really interested in your learning. I am enjoying it so far as it is very interactive, they introduce practical examples, and monitor your progress.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
