Leiden University vs Wageningen University vs Royal Academy of Art, The Hague vs HAN University of Applied Sciences vs Radboud University
Side-by-side comparison from 150 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Exceptional academic quality and renowned professors
- +Supportive and friendly student community
- +Comprehensive programs and student support services
- +Passionate, knowledgeable, and caring teachers
- +Relevant courses with career focus and internship opportunities
- +Inclusive, multicultural environment with modern facilities and green spaces
Nothing to show
- +Practical, industry-relevant learning with engaged, experienced staff.
- +Excellent facilities and a supportive, high-quality educational environment.
- +Balanced student life opportunities with an international atmosphere.
- +Excellent teachers and supportive staff
- +Engaging courses and flexible academic paths
- +Great facilities and friendly atmosphere
- +Exceptional professors and engaging teaching
- +Valued friendships and strong community
- +Emphasis on empathy and ethical leadership
- +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
- +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
- +Engaging hybrid learning format
- -Administrative and communication issues are prevalent.
- -Educational quality and professor engagement are lacking.
- -Perceived lack of equal opportunity and support for diverse student needs.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant problems.
- -Conflict of interest among professors detracts from the academic experience.
- -The value for tuition fees is questioned.
Nothing to show
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities are a recurring complaint.
- -Unresponsive or unhelpful staff contribute to dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -The curriculum is often irrelevant and not engaging.
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources are a significant concern.
- -The administrative and management systems are perceived as inefficient and unsupportive.
- -Communication and transparency from the institution are consistently lacking.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Perceived lack of value for money.
This university garners excellent scores across most aspects, with location being its standout strength. Facilities, student life, and internationality also receive very positive feedback. The value proposition is rated a solid 4. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest area, with a noticeably lower score compared to other metrics. Professors' ratings are also respectable, though slightly lower than the overall average.
This institution receives excellent scores across the board, with its **Facilities** standing out as a particular strength at 4.69. **Student Life** and **Value** are also highly rated, both achieving 4.08. The **Location** received the lowest score at 3.77, though overall satisfaction remains high.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **professors**, receiving a high rating of 4.43. Facilities and value are also highly regarded, both scoring 4.29. Conversely, the university's **location** and **accommodation** received the lowest marks at 3.86, suggesting these areas may warrant further attention for improvement. Student life and internationality are rated moderately well, with scores of 4.00 and 4.14 respectively.
This institution garners strong acclaim in several areas, with facilities standing out at an impressive 4.75. Student life and location also receive high marks, both above 4.5. Conversely, accommodation presents the lowest score at 4.03, indicating a potential area for improvement. Other aspects like professors, internationality, and value fall within a solid mid-range.
This institution presents a strong overall profile, excelling particularly in **Value** with a rating of 4.33. Facilities, Professors, and Student Life also received favorable scores of 4. The university's weakest area appears to be its **Location**, rated at 3.33. Accomodation and Internationality received solid mid-range scores, indicating good but not outstanding performance in these aspects.
With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.
With ~82% of 78 reviews being positive, students praise high-quality learning, renowned professors, and comprehensive programs. A small percentage (~3.9%) express dissatisfaction with bureaucracy and teaching quality.
~80% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable teachers, relevant courses, and a multicultural environment. A smaller ~20% express concerns regarding supervision and specific management departments.
Nothing to show
University feedback is overwhelmingly positive, with ~88% of reviews rating it 4-5 stars and an average of 4.25/5. Recurring themes include excellent facilities, supportive staff, and effective practical teaching. Minimal negative feedback was noted.
Over 98% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent facilities, supportive staff, and engaging coursework. Students frequently mention making new friends and a motivating learning environment. No negative feedback was reported.
With an average rating of 4/5 from 3 reviews, ~67% are positive. Students praise exceptional professors and the development of strong friendships, emphasizing empathy in business education. No negative feedback was provided.
With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.
This faculty in particular only serves the interest of the upper middle class and the rich. It screams DEI and inclusivity, but the message remains hollow, especially since most of these groups include individuals, who have said xenophobic and other discriminatory things about other students and staff in the past. DEI should celebrate all different diversities and not just a single issue one. There is an extrem lack of equal opportunities its always just opportunities for the same old people. How can the same person hold 3-4 positions in the faculty, and yet call the faculty a heaven of "equal opportunities"? To no surprise its just the already wealthy who get every opportunity. They eve created a grassroots funding system where the same old rich students, received yet another opportunity.... Its so cool that you give already rich students more money, instead of addressing structural issues within the faculty. And the worst thing is you leave traces of evidence everywhere, you even suck at false advertising. Theres a lot of hypocrisy in leiden and many students of vulnerable backgrounds are being ignored, slandered and even held back career wise. Yet the perpetrators can still remain in the drivers seat. The perpetrators are both students and staff. The administration/study advisors is terrible and quite frankly useless since everything has just become automated emails, there are no mentors and supervisors only like to serve students who are wealthy. A student could die and they would not care if they are still alive. The building is pretty but it had some leaks in the past. Overall after 2 suicide attempts thanks to their constant harassment and slander. I would give this faculty less than one star. Leiden archaeology is only for the rich conservatives who had failed so hard in their own economic system, that they had to enter a public university (with no entry barriers) because they couldn't compete with people that applied to go to Oxford or Cambridge . It truly is a neoliberal university.
I have overall had a great experience at WUR. As an international student, I felt very much included very fast, because there as so many internationals, and the Dutch also practically all speak English there. The courses being offered in English also helped with this. The teachers speak very clearly during lectures overall and are of great help during tutorials, where you are in smaller groups of students to put into practice the theory learned in class. Also, the campus is very modern, the classrooms and library are well taken care of and even have adjustable tables and chairs, to help avoid back/neck/arm pain when studying. The university also allows each student to have a study advisor for academic orientation or personal questions, guiding the students through the process to make sure they achieve their academic goals in the most adequate way for them. The manner of learning is also very multidisciplinary, which I really enjoy because it helps to get an overview of the world’s problems from each side of the story, taking all into consideration. The student life in Wageningen is quite in a cozy atmosphere I must say, because the city is so small, everyone is connected somehow and it is very easy to make friends. Lots of parties are house parties or some casual pot-luck dinners with friends. But there are also some nice pubs or bars and restaurants in the cute city centre where you can enjoy a drink or meal on a terrace. You can get from any point A to point B within 15-20min maximum in Wageningen with your bike, so it’s really practical for going out, groceries, or not having to wake up too early for classes! Many extra-curricular activities are offered by associations, where you can get accustomed to Dutch culture, sustainability projects, sports, and parties! I recommend this university to anyone looking for a nice balance between social and study life.
Nothing to show
The lesson materials we are receiving are quite interesting in regards to the course. We are learning about global issues and how to handle encountering different cultures as international social workers.
My experience with the university is going pretty well for now. In terms of education, I can say that they have thought about everything. The program is structured in such way that the study load never gets to be too much. You get to work with different kinds of materials, therefore, practice different skills. Also, it is very career-oriented - you can see how everything you learn will help you in the future. Another positive thing is that if you experience any challenges in your personal or education plan, there is always someone you can contact and get help or advice. Here, you can find the balance between social and student life. The environment is very international, as well. Basically, it gives a wonderful opportunity to grow in the professional plan, but also make connections. However, there is something that you should consider if you are planning to apply here, or anywhere in the Netherlands - the shortage of accommodation. The university provides rooms for first-year students, but after that, it is quite hard to get one on your own. If you are looking for a place, where you get excellent education without having to give up on your social life, I would definitely recommend it.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
