Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam - VU Amsterdam vs Hotelschool The Hague vs University of Twente vs Windesheim University of Applied Sciences vs ONCAMPUS Global

Side-by-side comparison from 297 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: ONCAMPUS Global (4.80)
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam - VU Amsterdam: wins 0/7 categories
Hotelschool The Hague: wins 0/7 categories
University of Twente: wins 0/7 categories
Windesheim University of Applied Sciences: wins 2/7 categories
ONCAMPUS Global: wins 4/7 categories
Wittenborg University of Applied Sciences: wins 1/7 categories
NHL Stenden University of Applied Sciences: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: B.Sc. in Psychology
The Hague, The Netherlands
3.70
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
Enschede, The Netherlands
4.30
Read more reviews
48 reviews
×
Best programme: Mechanical Engineering
Best programme: Global Project and Change Management
London, The United Kingdom
4.80
Top
Read more reviews
20 reviews
×
Best programme: Undergraduate Foundation Programme
Best programme: BBA (EBA) specialisation Entrepreneurship & Digital Marketing
Best programme: Creative Business
Category ratings
Facilities
3.77
3.67
4.38
4.55
Win
4.44
3.25
4.43
Location
3.92
3.00
4.15
4.50
4.74
Win
3.71
3.93
Professors
4.13
3.00
3.91
4.60
4.75
Win
3.38
3.81
Internationality
4.27
3.33
4.13
4.45
4.60
4.88
Win
4.47
Student life
3.98
3.33
3.98
4.20
4.56
Win
2.63
4.08
Value
4.19
3.33
4.21
4.65
Win
4.50
3.38
3.98
Accommodation
3.13
3.00
3.72
4.05
4.32
Win
3.50
3.65
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong theory-practice balance and real-world application
  • +High-quality, challenging, and expert-led education
  • +Diverse community and international opportunities
  • +Strong hospitality and business programs
  • +Opportunities for personal and professional development
  • +Diverse and inclusive community
  • +Diverse and multicultural learning environment.
  • +Flexible, research-oriented, and hands-on academic programs.
  • +Supportive community and innovative campus facilities.
  • +Practical, hands-on learning with real-world application
  • +Focus on sustainability and global change-making
  • +Unique, impactful, and interdisciplinary program design
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Excellent facilities and convenient location
  • +Strong academic and personal development support
  • +Practical, industry-focused curriculum with entrepreneurship and FinTech emphasis
  • +Supportive, international, and diverse academic environment
  • +Engaging and approachable professors and mentors
  • +Practical, project-based learning and real-world application
  • +Welcoming atmosphere and supportive community
  • +Opportunities for personal and professional growth
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and in poor condition.
  • -Communication and course organization are often cited as lacking.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and confusion.
  • -Lack of support and flexibility during personal emergencies is a significant problem.
  • -Inconsistent policies and unfair treatment are prevalent concerns.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a consistent problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support for students is a major concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep frustrate students.
  • -Lack of resources and inadequate support services are common complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of organization and poor management pervade all aspects of the institution.
  • -Ineffective communication and a general lack of teacher availability and feedback leave students unsupported.
  • -Unclear assignments and inconsistent assessment practices create confusion and frustration.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution received its highest marks for Internationality, closely followed by Value and Professors. Student Life also scored well. Conversely, Accomodation emerged as the weakest area, with Facilities also rating lower than other aspects. Location sits in the mid-range of these assessments.

The university presents a mixed but generally positive review. Facilities stand out as its strongest area, earning a notable 3.67. Areas like Professors, Location, and Accommodation received a solid 3. Conversely, Student Life, Internationality, and Value all scored a comparable 3.33. While facilities are a definite highlight, teaching quality and on-campus experience appear to be areas for potential improvement.

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in its **Facilities**, which received the highest rating. Students also rated **Value** and **Location** highly. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the area with the lowest score, while **Professors** and **Student Life** also scored moderately lower compared to other aspects. The overall profile indicates a positive student experience with room for improvement in specific domains.

Across various metrics, this institution demonstrates considerable strengths. Professors and value stand out with top scores of 4.6 and 4.65 respectively. Facilities and location also receive highly positive feedback. Student life, while still good at 4.2, represents the lowest-rated category among the surveyed aspects, with accommodation also scoring moderately. Internationality is also a strong point.

Overall, the university garners strong ratings across various aspects. Professors are exceptionally well-regarded, achieving the highest score. Location and Internationality also stand out with excellent marks. Student Life, Facilities, and Value also reflect positive sentiment. Accommodation, while still strong, receives the lowest rating among the surveyed categories.

A notable strength lies in the university's **Internationality**, achieving a high rating of 4.875. Conversely, **Student Life** received the lowest score at 2.625, suggesting an area for potential improvement. Other areas, including Accommodation, Location, Value, and Professors, fall within a moderate to good range, indicating a generally well-rounded offering with specific areas of excellence and those needing development.

Exceptional ratings were awarded to the university's **Facilities** (4.43) and **Internationality** (4.47). **Student Life** also scored well at 4.08 and **Value** at 3.98. The area requiring the most attention appears to be **Accomodation**, which received the lowest rating at 3.65, with **Professors** also scoring moderately lower than other categories at 3.81.

Reviews summary
Highlights

~88% of reviews are highly positive, praising the quality of education, practical application, and international environment. No negative feedback was received.

About 67% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong personal development and professional industry insights. The remaining 33% of feedback mentions issues with fairness and accountability.

With 43 positive reviews out of 48, students praise academic and social benefits, enjoyable learning experiences, and multi-cultural environments. The average rating is 4.31/5.

With an average rating of 4.52/5, approximately 95% of reviews are positive, highlighting the program's unique approach and preparation for real-world impact. No negative feedback was recorded.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% of 20 feedback entries rating 4–5 stars. Students praise friendly, supportive teachers, excellent facilities like the library, and effective student support services that build confidence.

Most feedback is positive (~74%), highlighting practical learning, entrepreneurship focus, and internationalism. There are no negative reviews in the provided data.

Approximately 94% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical learning, ample opportunities, and a welcoming atmosphere. A small percentage of negative feedback cites disorganization and communication issues.

Rating distribution
5★
38%
67%
42%
57%
75%
25%
23%
4★
50%
0%
48%
38%
25%
38%
65%
3★
12%
0%
10%
5%
0%
38%
7%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1%
1★
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
5%
Most useful review
Most liked
:)

As a computer science student at the Vrije Universitet in Amsterdam, I have been thoroughly impressed with the quality of education and the level of expertise of the professors at this esteemed institution. The faculty members are passionate about their subjects and are always willing to provide guidance and support to students. The curriculum is rigorous, and the coursework is designed to challenge students and prepare them for the ever-evolving world of technology. The courses cover a broad range of topics, from programming languages and algorithms to artificial intelligence and machine learning. The faculty also encourages students to take part in research projects and internships, providing valuable opportunities to apply what we have learned in the classroom to real-world scenarios. The campus facilities are excellent, with state-of-the-art labs and equipment available for students to use. The university's location in Amsterdam also offers plenty of opportunities for students to engage in cultural and recreational activities outside of their studies. One of the things that stand out to me is the diverse student body. Being exposed to different perspectives and backgrounds has enriched my learning experience and expanded my understanding of computer science as a field. Overall, I would highly recommend the Vrije Universitet to any computer science student looking for a challenging and rewarding academic experience, excellent faculty, and a diverse and inclusive community.

Nothing to show

Interactive courses

A good program to get to know different aspects of your study. Courses share an interaction with one main project in each quartile. Most teachers love their job and are interesting to listen to. The campus is set up really nicely, good to enjoy during breaks.

truly unique programme!!!

Finding Global Project and Change Management was a gift for me. After searching for study programmes related to sustainability, I was so happy to encounter this. I gained a first insight into GPCM by joining as a student for a day. After this, I was convinced that this study is truly unique. I never experienced such a thoughtful, and motivated community that is so commited to make a change in the world. The programme prepares us to be impactful changemakers that have a broad perspective of the whole system and themselves. It is so nice to also get space to develop not only professionally but also personally. Overall, it is truly inspiring to see oneself and others become more independent, skilled and commited throughout the years. I did never ever regret this choice and am forever thankful that this programme exists. Get in contact with the study and find out if you also want to become part of this amazing community!

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Creative Business

Studying Creative Business at NHL Stenden has been a great experience with a few bumps down the road. Generally speaking, I'm very glad about my choice to study here - as an international student I am surrounded by other internationals which makes me feel more welcome and comfortable; this university has provided me with numerous extracurricular opportunities, which were not only great for networking and finding like-minded connections, but also getting extremely nice and useful experience, whether it's working on a real set with professional production equipment or creating content and representing my course on social media! When it comes to the study itself, it usually is pretty confusing, as students are usually just thrown into practical projects without initial preparation and sometimes not enough guidance. However, once you get used to design-based education, you realize how exciting the assignments actually are - working with real clients, producing your own ideas and seeing them come to life, and just "creativity, creativity, creativity" everywhere. I recommend this university for those who are not afraid of teamwork, thinking outside of the box, and being independent.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close