Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam - VU Amsterdam vs Tilburg University vs TSM Business School vs ONCAMPUS Global vs Wittenborg University of Applied Sciences

Side-by-side comparison from 155 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: ONCAMPUS Global (4.80)
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam - VU Amsterdam: wins 0/7 categories
Tilburg University: wins 0/7 categories
TSM Business School: wins 0/7 categories
ONCAMPUS Global: wins 6/7 categories
Wittenborg University of Applied Sciences: wins 1/7 categories
Zuyd University of Applied Sciences: wins 0/7 categories
Amsterdam School of International Business - AMSIB: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: B.Sc. in Psychology
Tilburg, The Netherlands
4.20
Read more reviews
65 reviews
×
Best programme: Psychology
Enschede, The Netherlands
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
London, The United Kingdom
4.80
Top
Read more reviews
20 reviews
×
Best programme: Undergraduate Foundation Programme
Best programme: BBA (EBA) specialisation Entrepreneurship & Digital Marketing
Best programme: International Business
Best programme: Accounting
Category ratings
Facilities
3.77
4.22
Not rated
4.44
Win
3.25
4.43
3.67
Location
3.92
3.83
Not rated
4.74
Win
3.71
4.29
2.67
Professors
4.13
4.14
Not rated
4.75
Win
3.38
3.71
3.67
Internationality
4.27
4.22
Not rated
4.60
4.88
Win
4.43
3.00
Student life
3.98
4.06
Not rated
4.56
Win
2.63
4.14
3.33
Value
4.19
4.08
Not rated
4.50
Win
3.38
4.00
3.33
Accommodation
3.13
2.78
Not rated
4.32
Win
3.50
3.86
2.33
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong theory-practice balance and real-world application
  • +High-quality, challenging, and expert-led education
  • +Diverse community and international opportunities
  • +Excellent professors and specialized programs
  • +Inclusive and diverse environment with international peers
  • +Strong analytical skill development and practical learning opportunities

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Excellent facilities and convenient location
  • +Strong academic and personal development support
  • +Practical, industry-focused curriculum with entrepreneurship and FinTech emphasis
  • +Supportive, international, and diverse academic environment
  • +Engaging and approachable professors and mentors
  • +Personalized attention and supportive lecturers.
  • +Practical, project-based learning with real-world applications.
  • +Industry connections and career opportunities.
  • +Practical, hands-on learning with industry-relevant lecturers
  • +Broad program offering diverse career paths post-graduation
  • +Engaging real-world business case applications
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and in poor condition.
  • -Communication and course organization are often cited as lacking.
  • -Disorganized administration and lack of student guidance.
  • -Poor teacher support and patronizing interactions.
  • -High cost of living and unpleasant city environment.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep frustrate students.
  • -Lack of resources and inadequate support services are common complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently mentioned.
  • -Lack of engaging teaching and curriculum are significant concerns.
  • -Outdated systems and administrative issues
  • -Poor quality and unreliable teaching delivery
  • -Lack of practical application and outdated facilities
Rating summary
What students say

This institution received its highest marks for Internationality, closely followed by Value and Professors. Student Life also scored well. Conversely, Accomodation emerged as the weakest area, with Facilities also rating lower than other aspects. Location sits in the mid-range of these assessments.

This institution garners excellent marks for its **Facilities** and **Internationality**, both scoring a high 4.22. **Professors** are also highly regarded at 4.14, with **Student Life** and **Value** receiving solid ratings of 4.06 and 4.08 respectively. **Location** is rated moderately well at 3.83. The weakest area identified is **Accomodation**, which received a notably lower score of 2.78.

Nothing to show

Overall, the university garners strong ratings across various aspects. Professors are exceptionally well-regarded, achieving the highest score. Location and Internationality also stand out with excellent marks. Student Life, Facilities, and Value also reflect positive sentiment. Accommodation, while still strong, receives the lowest rating among the surveyed categories.

A notable strength lies in the university's **Internationality**, achieving a high rating of 4.875. Conversely, **Student Life** received the lowest score at 2.625, suggesting an area for potential improvement. Other areas, including Accommodation, Location, Value, and Professors, fall within a moderate to good range, indicating a generally well-rounded offering with specific areas of excellence and those needing development.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its **Facilities** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.43. The **Location** also receives high marks at 4.29. Areas for potential improvement include **Professors**, with a rating of 3.71, and **Accomodation** at 3.86. **Student Life** is rated favorably at 4.14, while **Value** stands at a solid 4.0.

This university demonstrates a solid performance in its **facilities and professors**, both scoring a respectable 3.67. The **student life and value** also receive a decent rating of 3.33. However, the **accommodation and location** stand out as weaker areas, receiving the lowest scores. Internationality is rated moderately at 3.0.

Reviews summary
Highlights

~88% of reviews are highly positive, praising the quality of education, practical application, and international environment. No negative feedback was received.

The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~92% of reviews rating it 4-5 stars. Students praise excellent teaching, expert professors, and strong program specialization. A small percentage of negative reviews mention disorganization and limited guidance.

Nothing to show

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% of 20 feedback entries rating 4–5 stars. Students praise friendly, supportive teachers, excellent facilities like the library, and effective student support services that build confidence.

Most feedback is positive (~74%), highlighting practical learning, entrepreneurship focus, and internationalism. There are no negative reviews in the provided data.

Four positive reviews highlight program flexibility, practical application, and supportive lecturers. The average rating is 3.71/5, with no negative feedback.

Two out of three reviews are positive, highlighting hands-on learning and practical lecturers. One negative review mentions outdated systems and unreliable lectures. The average rating is 3/5.

Rating distribution
5★
38%
34%
0%
75%
25%
14%
0%
4★
50%
58%
0%
25%
38%
43%
67%
3★
12%
5%
0%
0%
38%
43%
0%
2★
0%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
33%
Most useful review
Most liked
:)

As a computer science student at the Vrije Universitet in Amsterdam, I have been thoroughly impressed with the quality of education and the level of expertise of the professors at this esteemed institution. The faculty members are passionate about their subjects and are always willing to provide guidance and support to students. The curriculum is rigorous, and the coursework is designed to challenge students and prepare them for the ever-evolving world of technology. The courses cover a broad range of topics, from programming languages and algorithms to artificial intelligence and machine learning. The faculty also encourages students to take part in research projects and internships, providing valuable opportunities to apply what we have learned in the classroom to real-world scenarios. The campus facilities are excellent, with state-of-the-art labs and equipment available for students to use. The university's location in Amsterdam also offers plenty of opportunities for students to engage in cultural and recreational activities outside of their studies. One of the things that stand out to me is the diverse student body. Being exposed to different perspectives and backgrounds has enriched my learning experience and expanded my understanding of computer science as a field. Overall, I would highly recommend the Vrije Universitet to any computer science student looking for a challenging and rewarding academic experience, excellent faculty, and a diverse and inclusive community.

Good in theory

The city is quite bad to live in and ugly, on top of very expensive. The faculty of psychology is quite okay. Studying there has given me a good theoretical base. However, I have one major complaint, which is the way the university treats students individually. The student desk is the only way to obtain official documents from them (for example, the documents I needed to apply for a Master's degre) and aside from the difficult office hours and long wait time on the phone, I was literally told upon requesting a very necessary document "sorry, we´re not going to do that for you, it is too much work for us". when I suggested that I could put the document together myself and then just have it reviewed and stamped by them, she said htat it wouldn´t be valid. This resulted in me not being able to apply for Masters that year and taking a gap year, which is not the impact I ever thought a clerk would have on my life. Another complaint I have that resulted in a life-changing event is about my thesis. I chose to do a systematic review (within the Clinical Track) because it interested me, and I was fully informed that the program of the systematic review was still a pilot and subject to change. My supervisor was lovely and I had a great experience with her, that left me feeling like I learned something, and I was going to get a decent grade on said thesis that would then allow me to apply for a Clinical Psychology Masters in the Netherlands. For context, up until this point in my education, I had never failed an exam or a course as I always had average to high grades and I dedicate the appropriate time and effort to my studies. My thesis, on the other hand, was rather controversial. I received the grade I expected from my supervisor (which was within the range of my grades overall), whereas the second assessor failed me on half the criteria and didn't put in the effort to provide appropriate feedback. As the two grades were too different from each other, my thesis was reviewed by a third assessor, who just did the averages between the grades of the first two assessors and included sad faces ":(" in her feedback for my months of work, which all resulted in a grade that still hinders me in my academic progress, two years later. Upon respectfully confronting the third assessor I was offered neither an explanation nor a justification (perhaps I had been misled during the process of writing my thesis) for the feedback (which at times was completely erroneous as it contradicted published and peer reviewed literature I had consulted while while writing), and I was told that my thesis would just not be reasessed. I would not still be going on about this if it wasn't for the fact that I was just taught the findings of my thesis (which I was told was completely wrong) while studying for the master's degree that I did manage to get into with my grades. To sum up, while this faculty rigurously prepares students through content and theory, the students are nothing to them.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

employability skills

ZUYD University is ideal for those looking to bridge academics with real-world applications. Known for its practical and project-based curriculum, it offers smaller class sizes ensuring personalized attention from professors. The university specializes in fields like Hotel Management, European Studies, and Creative Industries, with strong industry connections that provide students with internships and career opportunities across Europe. Located in Maastricht, students benefit from a vibrant student life and access to a network of multinational companies in the region. The modern facilities, such as the state-of-the-art kitchens for hospitality students or the design labs for creative disciplines, are impressive. What stands out is ZUYD’s emphasis on employability skills, from public speaking to networking. While it lacks the expansive campus vibe of larger universities, the close-knit community feel more than compensates. ZUYD is perfect for hands-on learners aiming for a career-ready education in an international setting.

Studying the future

I’ve been studying at AMSIB for 3 years now. Almost 2 years were online studying due to COVID so I will share my experience considering most of the study up till now was online. I did start this year going to campus again. The program overall is pretty general. That makes the program pretty attractive to anybody because you can go to so many different fields after graduating. There is a possibility to do a major and to specialise in a field you like. However, the selection is pretty small (only 6 different majors) so that could be a point for improvement. The building of the school is located pretty far from the city centre and is placed next to a shopping area. As a result, there is not a lot to do around so most students just go home after. It’s a shame cause socialising is very important for us students. The school itself does not initiate a lot of social activities/ events which I think is a shame as well. The quality of the classes and the range of courses are pretty good. Some courses I would have to preferred to skip but most courses are a good pick. I really feel after 3 years that I gained so much knowledge about the business world and everything around it. The communication between students and teachers should be better. The communication goes through email and is very slow. Teachers should be more involved in my opinion. Diversity and inclusivity are also pretty impressive. However, the students should be more spread out between classes cause many classes are mostly Dutch students which counteracts the whole international environment idea. To finish, I would recommend the program as students gain enough knowledge by the time they want to choose a major which makes more students pursue their desired career path. I feel the school is working a lot on improving itself and its courses so I think it’s on the right path.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close