United International Business Schools - UIBS vs University of Groningen - RUG vs TSM Business School vs Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences vs Hanze University of Applied Sciences - UAS
Side-by-side comparison from 169 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and helpful faculty
- +Positive and enriching learning experience
- +Safe and well-equipped campus
- +High-quality faculty and innovative, interdisciplinary teaching
- +World-class, relevant programs and state-of-the-art facilities
- +International atmosphere and opportunities for self-development
Nothing to show
- +Engaging, hands-on learning connected to real careers.
- +Supportive, diverse community and international connections.
- +Vibrant campus life and modern facilities.
- +Practical, skills-based learning and interconnected subjects
- +Helpful, inspiring teachers and supportive staff
- +International atmosphere and diverse group work opportunities
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support frustrates students.
- -Lack of support and care for academic progression
- -Arrogance, disrespect, and discrimination
- -Confusion and inflexibility in academic processes
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and ineffective curriculum are common complaints.
- -Outdated curriculum and irrelevant content.
- -Lack of practical application and low teacher commitment.
- -Inefficient administrative processes.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Academic and environmental aspects of the university are highly regarded, with professors and location both receiving a near-perfect score of 4.75. Student life is also a positive, scoring 4.25, and internationality and value are strong at 4.5. Facilities and accommodation present the weakest areas, both rated at 4.
This university garners strong approval in several key aspects, particularly excelling in Internationality with a rating of 4.27. Student Life and Facilities also received high marks, both exceeding 4.20. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring significantly lower at 2.88. Other areas like Professors, Location, and Value are rated moderately well, generally falling between 3.83 and 4.05.
Nothing to show
The university demonstrates notable strengths in **Location** and **Facilities**, both receiving ratings above 4.2. **Student Life** and **Value** also score well, indicating a positive student experience and perceived return on investment. **Accomodation** and **Internationality** emerge as areas with the lowest scores, suggesting potential for improvement in these aspects of university life. The average rating across all categories remains solid.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in student life and internationality, both scoring above 4.5. Location also received a high rating. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest area with a score of 3.16. Professor quality and facilities are rated moderately well, while value for money is also a positive aspect.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~75% of reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive learning environment and helpful, passionate faculty. One review mentioned slow administrative services.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting high-quality faculty, state-of-the-art facilities, and excellent academic programs. A smaller ~11% of feedback expresses concerns about teaching support and student well-being.
Nothing to show
Around ~99% of reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive community and modern, hands-on learning connected to real-world careers. There are no negative reviews to summarize.
~70% of reviews are positive, highlighting helpful teachers, practical learning, and an international atmosphere. A small portion of feedback (~3%) mentions outdated curriculum and low teacher commitment.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Not to use harsh words but Dutch culture is extremely toxic towards people who do not resemble their look and do not conform to their culture The school is extremely arrogant and disrespectful to people and caused me severe mental health stress and social isolation I believe such school is never place for exchanging knowledge or anything in fact the school bullying, and stereotypes towards autism on top of their staggering level of racism is insane. If you complaint about the racism of the people there, they will never take you seriously or initiate investigations One of the most regretful incidents of my life has been chosen to come to this school and that I regret very much If you’re of East Asian background, unless you have very good resistance to Dutch people’s “jokes” and passive aggression, I will almost certainly hope you never attend this school. Student Number s5884284
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I followed the Marketing & Communications Bachelor at Hanzehogeschool and the course has taught me very little with regards to what is actually required in the marketing field. To start off, 90% of the teachers do lectures as a side job, very low commitment from most of them I spent a full year learning and applying marketing theories that were branded outdated in the 90's and early 2000's. In addition a whole semester was wasted on a theory one of the teachers came up with. The professor who guided my while writing my thesis laughed at the premise of using it. Current and future marketing is mostly based on digital marketing. The """"professor"""" digital marketing knew squat, zero. In the digital marketing field, aspects such as SEO, SEA, Google AdWords etc are vital. This was not taught properly in the curriculum. A fellow student who had a side job working with AdWords stopped showing up, as he claimed the teacher was explaining it wrong. If you want to get into marketing, go somewhere else. Hanze will teach how to do a SWOT analysis (debunked in the 90's) every year you attend and not teach you the skills vital in a new marketing environment. I do not work in marketing or advertising, I feel and know I do not possess the necessary skills from merely reading the job vacancy. I finished the degree to make sure I have a Bachelor standard and not completely waste my time and money.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
