The Hague University of Applied Sciences - THUAS vs Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam - VU Amsterdam vs Inholland University of Applied Sciences vs Royal Academy of Art, The Hague vs Saxion University of Applied Sciences
Side-by-side comparison from 134 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality programs and engaging content
- +Excellent facilities and vibrant campus environment
- +Strong lecturers, supportive staff, and ample career opportunities
- +Strong theory-practice balance and real-world application
- +High-quality, challenging, and expert-led education
- +Diverse community and international opportunities
- +Passionate teachers & practical real-world experience
- +Supportive lecturers & readily available help
- +Project-based learning instead of traditional exams
Nothing to show
- +Practical, career-oriented learning
- +Supportive and friendly teachers
- +Welcoming, international environment
- +Flexible online learning model
- +Academic rigor and intellectual challenge
- +Supportive faculty and administration
Nothing to show
- -Lack of practical and relevant learning.
- -Poor course content and quality of education.
- -Disappointing and unmotivating academic experience.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and in poor condition.
- -Communication and course organization are often cited as lacking.
- -Excessive administrative burdens and communication problems.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources.
- -Poorly structured curriculum and teaching quality.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of essential resources are common complaints.
- -Poor communication and a lack of transparency from the administration frustrate students.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Ineffective teaching and curriculum lead to poor educational outcomes.
Nothing to show
This university receives excellent marks in several key areas, most notably Internationality (4.59) and Location (4.49). Facilities also score highly at 4.43. Student Life and Professors are rated well, both at 4.11, with Value also matching this score. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.46.
This institution received its highest marks for Internationality, closely followed by Value and Professors. Student Life also scored well. Conversely, Accomodation emerged as the weakest area, with Facilities also rating lower than other aspects. Location sits in the mid-range of these assessments.
With a robust score of 4.58, the university excels in its **Facilities**. **Student Life** and **Accomodation**, however, present areas for improvement, scoring 3.75 and 2.92 respectively. Ratings for Professors, Location, Internationality, and Value fall within a moderate range.
Nothing to show
Remarkably strong marks were awarded in several key areas. Internationality stands out as the highest-rated aspect, closely followed by Facilities and Value. Location also received a very positive score. On the other hand, Accomodation received the lowest rating among the surveyed categories, indicating an area for potential improvement. Professors and Student Life scored moderately well.
An analysis of the university's ratings reveals a stark contrast between its strengths and weaknesses. The institution excels in **Value** (4.84), **Professors** (4.68), and **Internationality** (4.68). Conversely, **Location** (1.89), **Accomodation** (1.95), and **Student Life** (2.05) received significantly lower scores, indicating areas that may require improvement. Facilities are rated moderately at 2.74.
Nothing to show
~73% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent programs, facilities, and career opportunities. The environment and student life are also praised. A small ~3% of feedback expresses disappointment with a lack of practical learning in specific courses.
~88% of reviews are highly positive, praising the quality of education, practical application, and international environment. No negative feedback was received.
With an average rating of 4/5 from 13 reviews, ~85% of feedback is positive. Students highlight passionate teachers, practical/project-based learning, and valuable real-world experience. There are no negative reviews.
Nothing to show
Most feedback is positive, highlighting supportive teachers and practical, career-oriented programs. A minor point mentioned is occasional disorganization and poor communication regarding the online platform.
Nearly all reviews are positive, with students praising academic rigor, challenging coursework, and flexible online learning. Supervisors and the platform are also frequently highlighted as supportive and effective.
Nothing to show
I will only talk about my major here, but in general, ICM is good with a broad career prospect. The teachers are always there to help us. They also handled the pandemic situation quite good. I chose THUAS and ICM because I could experience both a semester exchange and internship, unlike the other unis. For some reason student life after the pandemic is a lot better, with various fun activities and external events, maybe because we just stayed at home for a year or more:) The cons: understaffed, so we could see if the teachers are tired and sometimes affect us (and the time we get our grade). Overall, ICM at THUAS is 7/10
As a computer science student at the Vrije Universitet in Amsterdam, I have been thoroughly impressed with the quality of education and the level of expertise of the professors at this esteemed institution. The faculty members are passionate about their subjects and are always willing to provide guidance and support to students. The curriculum is rigorous, and the coursework is designed to challenge students and prepare them for the ever-evolving world of technology. The courses cover a broad range of topics, from programming languages and algorithms to artificial intelligence and machine learning. The faculty also encourages students to take part in research projects and internships, providing valuable opportunities to apply what we have learned in the classroom to real-world scenarios. The campus facilities are excellent, with state-of-the-art labs and equipment available for students to use. The university's location in Amsterdam also offers plenty of opportunities for students to engage in cultural and recreational activities outside of their studies. One of the things that stand out to me is the diverse student body. Being exposed to different perspectives and backgrounds has enriched my learning experience and expanded my understanding of computer science as a field. Overall, I would highly recommend the Vrije Universitet to any computer science student looking for a challenging and rewarding academic experience, excellent faculty, and a diverse and inclusive community.
I started my journey with Inholland international creative business in September 2022. What sets this program apart from traditional university business majors is that we don't have exams. Instead we have projects that need to be completed, each semester we get different assignments based on the module of study, some of them are individual and some are in groups. The project-based approach to learning can be a refreshing change from traditional exams, especially for people that never liked exams. Located in close proximity to the city center and train station, the uni is easily accessible. The building itself is relatively new but not really big. The course material is engaging and not overly challenging, especially for those interested in the creative industry. The studies give you some free time to explore other interests or for a part-time job. Teachers are nice and helpful, you can always ask them any questions. I recommend asking a lot, it always helps! For first-year students, the university offers accommodation support, since it's not easy to find one especially in the netherlands. The university organizes some additional events or activities that everybody can take part in. Some of the ones I remember are: theater classes, classouting, painting cups, making tie-dye tote bags and Christmasmarket. Also for first years at the beginning of the uni year we have an intro week to meet people from your year and get to know them in a chill atmosphere (beach day/ boat trip). The only flaw so far is a slight inaccuracy in the program. Due to changes in the curriculum, some teachers' answers may differ in terms of assignments. However, a good solution for this is to direct questions related to assignments to the teacher who is grading them. Overall my experience so far is pretty good and I can recommend it to anyone interested in the same major.
Nothing to show
Saxion - CMGT - Creative Media and Game Technologies - 2.5/5 TLDR: I only recommend the CMGT course to someone who is already disciplined to REALLY study the gaming topic they are interested in outside the dedicated time for the university. If you are looking for a course that makes you "game industry ready" look elsewhere. I finished the CMGT (Creative Media and Game Technologies) course as an artist in 2022. I went to Saxion (Enschede) with the dream of becoming a concept artist for video games (as advertised on the official website), after 4 years and €10000 dept I can say that I would have gotten the same knowledge out of top €1000 in relevant courses. A lot of the topics we went through are just "oh that's interesting to know, so when can I learn to draw concept art?". There was a lack of focus for artist in general (2D and 3D), you never get deep into any topic and most things except the bare basics are for you to learn in your own time. In addition, the amount of actual gaming projects is laughable for a course that advertises itself as gaming focused. But there were good things, even great things. The fellow students were very great partners and the teachers are knowledgeable and easy going. There is a very low focus on "memorize this and write it down" type test. 95% of the (art) grades are project based, meaning you create something (concepts, prototypes etc.) with other CMGT students (Other branches of CMGT are programmer and designer). Enschede itself is a great city to life in, with more than enough places to visit to fill the years with activities. In the last 2 years the students focus on larger projects, and for me, it was the case that the actual document that will be uploaded is much, much more important than the actual product we create. This was very frustrating because as an artist, I want to make things, not write documents all day. I would only recommend the CMGT to someone that is: 1) In need of a guided education about the basics of game making (equivalent of easy to get courses online) but more expensive of course 2) Interested in living in the Netherlands and experiencing the culture 3) Looking for an "easy" bachelor that can be obtained if you put in a bit of effort 4) A hardworking individual that does the bachelor on the side while advancing in their own domain of interest. Afterword: At the end of my study, I was so removed from what I actually wanted to learn that I could not advance professionally in the field I wanted to work in (concept art). Instead, I learned some things about UI design, which to be honest is a topic I really don't care about. **Important Note: The last 2 years of my studies were impacted by the covid pandemic.
I am a PhD student at Global Humanistic University. I chose GHU because of its flexible and balanced learning model of online education. With the busy schedules of my entrepreneurial journey, GHU has offered me an effective education model which aligns with my aspiration of right balance between professional work, education, and family. My supervisor and the administration team are effective in their communication which makes learning and coordination hustle free. I recommend GHU for professionals who desire to enhance their education.
Nothing to show
