Maastricht University - UM vs Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam - VU Amsterdam vs Fontys University of Applied Sciences vs ONCAMPUS Global vs Wittenborg University of Applied Sciences
Side-by-side comparison from 169 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +International and intercultural environment
- +Problem-Based Learning (PBL) approach
- +Supportive and engaging learning community
- +Strong theory-practice balance and real-world application
- +High-quality, challenging, and expert-led education
- +Diverse community and international opportunities
- +Supportive and caring staff
- +Practical and international experience opportunities
- +Strong preparation for the job industry
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
- +Excellent facilities and convenient location
- +Strong academic and personal development support
- +Practical, industry-focused curriculum with entrepreneurship and FinTech emphasis
- +Supportive, international, and diverse academic environment
- +Engaging and approachable professors and mentors
- +Creative business program focus on industry & digital media skills
- +Supportive supervisors and professors
- +Freedom, informal atmosphere, and creativity
- +Internship and study abroad opportunities
- +Strong career prospects and networking
- -Problem-based learning (PBL) is a disappointing and overly demanding method.
- -High failure rates and strict academic progression policies create significant pressure.
- -Exploitative professors prioritize personal gain over student development and connections.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and in poor condition.
- -Communication and course organization are often cited as lacking.
- -Lack of perceived learning and skills development.
- -Poor quality of personnel and learning environment.
- -Administrative and management indifference to student concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep frustrate students.
- -Lack of resources and inadequate support services are common complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
- -Program content and delivery often fail to meet expectations.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and poor learning resources are frequently criticized.
- -A lack of clear communication and student support is a recurring complaint.
This institution receives strong marks in several key areas, notably **Internationality** at 4.41 and **Facilities** at 4.24. **Value** also scores highly at 4.26. The university's **Accomodation** is its lowest-rated aspect, coming in at 3.02. Other areas like Professors, Student Life, and Location all fall within a generally positive range.
This institution received its highest marks for Internationality, closely followed by Value and Professors. Student Life also scored well. Conversely, Accomodation emerged as the weakest area, with Facilities also rating lower than other aspects. Location sits in the mid-range of these assessments.
This institution scores remarkably well in several key areas. Facilities stand out with a rating of 4.31. Professors, location, internationality, and value also receive strong marks, all averaging around 4.12. Student life scores a respectable 3.69, while accommodation emerges as the lowest-rated category at 3.29.
Overall, the university garners strong ratings across various aspects. Professors are exceptionally well-regarded, achieving the highest score. Location and Internationality also stand out with excellent marks. Student Life, Facilities, and Value also reflect positive sentiment. Accommodation, while still strong, receives the lowest rating among the surveyed categories.
A notable strength lies in the university's **Internationality**, achieving a high rating of 4.875. Conversely, **Student Life** received the lowest score at 2.625, suggesting an area for potential improvement. Other areas, including Accommodation, Location, Value, and Professors, fall within a moderate to good range, indicating a generally well-rounded offering with specific areas of excellence and those needing development.
This university shows significant strengths in its **Location**, which received a high rating. Areas such as **Facilities** and **Internationality** are also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents a notable weakness, with the lowest score among all evaluated aspects. **Value** and **Student Life** also received more modest ratings, indicating potential areas for improvement.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its vibrant student life, earning a perfect score, and its convenient location, which is rated highly at 4.5. Conversely, areas requiring attention include the quality of professors and accommodation, both receiving a middle-of-the-road 3. Facilities and internationality also fall into this moderate range. The overall value proposition sits at a respectable 3.5.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting a strong international focus, Problem-Based Learning, and a welcoming atmosphere. A smaller portion (about 9%) expresses negative sentiment regarding organization and learning methods.
~88% of reviews are highly positive, praising the quality of education, practical application, and international environment. No negative feedback was received.
~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting supportive staff, good programs, and practical experience. A smaller portion, ~7.4%, expresses concerns about program structure, learning outcomes, and personnel quality.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% of 20 feedback entries rating 4–5 stars. Students praise friendly, supportive teachers, excellent facilities like the library, and effective student support services that build confidence.
Most feedback is positive (~74%), highlighting practical learning, entrepreneurship focus, and internationalism. There are no negative reviews in the provided data.
Approximately 57% of reviews are positive, praising skill development and professional support. Some feedback notes a need for improved career services and more networking opportunities. A small portion (~29%) expressed dissatisfaction with program relevance and lecturer quality.
With a 3.5/5 average rating, this university receives positive feedback (~100% of reviews) highlighting program length, internship opportunities, study abroad options, and strong career prospects. No negative feedback was provided.
One of the most advertised features of the university, it is very pressuring and does not deliver the promised results - everything still has to be learned in the same manner as everywhere else - but here no tutorials are to be missed and PBL is supposed to be a key to successful graduation. Doing twice the work, therefore dividing the attention and time resources, without other options for students struggling with this method - then you are on your own.
As a computer science student at the Vrije Universitet in Amsterdam, I have been thoroughly impressed with the quality of education and the level of expertise of the professors at this esteemed institution. The faculty members are passionate about their subjects and are always willing to provide guidance and support to students. The curriculum is rigorous, and the coursework is designed to challenge students and prepare them for the ever-evolving world of technology. The courses cover a broad range of topics, from programming languages and algorithms to artificial intelligence and machine learning. The faculty also encourages students to take part in research projects and internships, providing valuable opportunities to apply what we have learned in the classroom to real-world scenarios. The campus facilities are excellent, with state-of-the-art labs and equipment available for students to use. The university's location in Amsterdam also offers plenty of opportunities for students to engage in cultural and recreational activities outside of their studies. One of the things that stand out to me is the diverse student body. Being exposed to different perspectives and backgrounds has enriched my learning experience and expanded my understanding of computer science as a field. Overall, I would highly recommend the Vrije Universitet to any computer science student looking for a challenging and rewarding academic experience, excellent faculty, and a diverse and inclusive community.
I like the possibility to self study, find materials and information, as well as the freedom of learning what I am interested in, while receiving feedback from my teachers which helps me getting on the right track.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Very flexible in what you can choose, but the course can be very vague and push you into the marketing or film track. Other specializations don't get as many options for the graduation project. There are also some very passionate and good teachers at the school, but sometimes classes don't really follow with what you need to know for the deliverable
Nothing to show
