London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs The University of Edinburgh vs University of Central Lancashire - UCLAN vs ONCAMPUS Global vs London Academy of Trading - LAT
Side-by-side comparison from 542 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty
- +High-quality academic programs and clear feedback
- +Excellent facilities and resources
- +Excellent faculty and engaging lectures
- +Diverse student community and global opportunities
- +Top-tier facilities and vibrant campus life
- +Practical skills and hands-on experience
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
- +Enhanced confidence and independence
- +Supportive and approachable teachers
- +Excellent student support services
- +Convenient campus location and facilities
- +Supportive and knowledgeable tutors
- +Engaging daily webinars with market analysis
- +Improved trading profitability and understanding
- +Small class sizes and personalized attention
- +Engaging and well-structured courses with enriching opportunities
- +Knowledgeable, approachable tutors and transferable skills development
- +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
- +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
- +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
- -Poor teaching quality and unstructured courses.
- -High fees combined with lack of support and career services.
- -Limited social life and judgmental environment.
- -Administrative and management issues disrupt learning and impact student experience.
- -University relies on prestige without investing in student experience improvements.
- -Programmatic offerings and facilities can fall short of expectations.
- -Poor support and understanding for disabled students.
- -Ineffective teaching and unclear explanations from lecturers.
- -Disorganized administration and mismanaged funding.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and lack of clear communication are frustrating.
- -Limited resources and support for academic needs are a concern.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of engagement and uninspired teaching methods are disliked.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of support and clear communication are prevalent concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
Examining the university's performance reveals a diverse set of scores. The strongest areas are **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving very high marks. **Student Life** stands out as the weakest performing category. Other areas like **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Facilities** received solid, above-average ratings, with **Value** also scoring positively.
This institution garners particularly strong scores in **Location** (4.78) and **Internationality** (4.51), alongside positive feedback for **Student Life** (4.42) and **Facilities** (4.32). Professors also receive favorable ratings (4.22). The university's **Accommodations** are its lowest-rated area (3.86), though overall **Value** remains solid at 4.0.
This university demonstrates considerable strengths in its Facilities, achieving a high rating. Student Life and Internationality also received favorable scores, indicating positive experiences in these areas. Conversely, Accommodations were rated the lowest, suggesting room for improvement. Professors and Value also scored well, while Location received a strong, though not top-tier, evaluation.
This institution garners strong approval across multiple aspects, with particularly high marks for its **Professors (4.76)** and **Location (4.75)**. Student life and internationality also score well, above 4.5. **Accommodations (4.35)** received the lowest rating, though still generally positive, while facilities and value demonstrate solid, above-average performance.
Across numerous metrics, this institution demonstrates exceptional strengths. Facilities, professors, location, student life, and internationality all garnered perfect scores, indicating outstanding offerings in these domains. The sole area falling slightly short, though still very strong, is accommodation at 4.5 stars, suggesting a minor area for potential enhancement compared to its otherwise flawless performance.
Overall, the university presents a strong profile, excelling particularly in student life with a perfect score. Location and value also received very high marks. Conversely, internationality stands out as the weakest area, indicating room for improvement. Facilities and accommodation received solid, above-average ratings.
This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.
Approximately 96.6% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable professors, supportive learning environments, and strong academic reputations. A small percentage (around 3.4%) of negative feedback cites issues with lecturing, grading, and course structure.
With a 4.29 average rating from 131 reviews, approximately 84% praise excellent faculty, facilities, and varied student opportunities. A small ~1.5% of feedback noted issues with lecturer strikes and program expectations.
Over 90% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong programs and helpful lecturers. A small amount of feedback mentions issues with accessibility and organizational concerns.
All 21 reviews are positive, averaging 4.76/5 stars. Students frequently praised helpful teachers, strong academic support, and good facilities. Some also highlighted a positive transition experience and newfound confidence.
Both reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Key highlights include excellent tutors, engaging daily webinars, and improved trading profitability. Students appreciated the supportive learning environment that clarified market understanding.
With 3 reviews and an average of 4.67/5, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight improved teaching quality due to small class sizes and enjoyable, well-matched courses with passionate tutors offering transferable skills.
Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
Overall the university is good, they have an easy way to apply for extensions on coursework, and special circumstances, which my personal tutor was more than happy to help with, she really was the best. My supervisor for my dissertation was also really supportive and helped through the challenging times. The lecturers are usually helpful if you are stuck, but there were some who would do the bare minimum for the students.
The school is competitive and you have to be pretty well up on the basics of the subject as the course is fast-paced and has no time for slow coaches. Good layout for both disability and wheelchair users, clean and up to date technology, providing lots of pastoral activities, student union and support excellent.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
