University of Plovdiv Paisii Hilendarski vs American University in Bulgaria - AUBG vs Agricultural University Plovdiv - AU vs New Bulgarian University - NBU vs International Business School Bulgaria - IBS
Side-by-side comparison from 103 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality education and practical skills
- +Outstanding and supportive teaching staff
- +Engaging and relevant program content
- +Rigorous academics and global perspective from faculty
- +Supportive community and strong mentorship
- +Experiential learning and American college experience
- +High-level training and personalized attention from teachers.
- +Well-equipped facilities and a comprehensive campus with amenities.
- +Strong reputation in agrarian sciences and international specialization opportunities.
- +Supportive and professional faculty
- +Relevant and practical program content
- +Modern facilities and engaging learning environment
- +Strong real-world preparation and business application
- +Inspiring and life-directing academic projects
- +Motivation and impactful thesis experience
Nothing to show
- +Valuable practical skills and clinical exposure
- +Diverse and collaborative international student community
- -Poor administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Course content and teaching methods are perceived as irrelevant and uninspiring.
- -Unresponsive and disorganized administration creates significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance detract from the learning environment.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty and staff causes confusion.
- -Inconsistent communication and administrative issues plague student experience.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are a constant frustration.
- -Limited career support and unclear future prospects create significant anxiety.
- -Outdated curriculum and unproductive teaching methods.
- -Lack of sufficient instructors and support staff for large student numbers.
- -Unfulfilled program goals and wasted course content.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of career support and future planning is a significant concern.
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources.
- -Poor communication and administrative inefficiency.
- -Inflexible and unengaging course structures.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its value for money, with a rating of 3.75. Professors, location, and student life also received solid marks of 3.25. Conversely, the facilities and accommodation areas present areas for improvement, scoring 2.75 and 2.5 respectively. Internationality is rated at a moderate 3.
Student life stands out as the highest-rated aspect of the university, achieving an impressive score. Facilities also perform strongly. Conversely, location received the lowest marks among the surveyed categories. Other areas like professors, accommodation, internationality, and value garnered solid, positive ratings, indicating a generally well-regarded institution.
Considering the provided ratings, this institution presents a uniform evaluation across all surveyed categories, with no areas standing out as particularly strong or weak. Each aspect – Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value – received a rating of zero, indicating a need for significant development across the board.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its academic offerings, with high ratings for Professors (3.875) and Facilities (3.8125). Student life and internationalization also received positive scores. Conversely, the Location appears to be the weakest area, scoring significantly lower than other aspects. Accommodations and overall value present a moderate performance.
Overall, this institution demonstrates a solid performance, with its strongest areas being **Value (4)** and **Internationality (3.5)**, alongside positive marks for Professors and Accommodations. Conversely, **Student Life (2.25)** received the lowest rating, indicating a potential area for improvement. Facilities and Location fall within the moderate range.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, notably achieving a perfect score in **Internationality** (5). It also excels in **Location** (4.5), with robust ratings for **Facilities**, **Accomodation**, and **Value** (all 4). The primary area for potential improvement is **Student Life**, which received a lower rating of 3.
With a 4/5 average rating, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students highlight high-quality education, qualified professors, and strong programs. Some mention a few irrelevant courses and bureaucratic challenges.
~99% of reviews are positive, praising rigorous academics, diverse extracurriculars, supportive community, and approachable faculty. No negative feedback was recorded.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating from two reviews, students highlight high-quality agrarian science training, well-equipped facilities, and individual attention from instructors. There are no negative reviews.
Most of the 33 reviews are positive (~74%), highlighting supportive professors, modern facilities, and engaging programs. A small percentage (~6%) of negative feedback mentions outdated or unproductive courses and insufficient teaching staff for some programs.
With an average rating of 3.5/5, reviews are predominantly positive, with about 25% of feedback highlighting strong preparation for real-life situations and valuable project development. No negative feedback was recorded.
Nothing to show
With two positive reviews and an average rating of 4/5, students highlight the University's strong focus on medical sciences and excellent clinical practice opportunities. The inclusive community with international and local students is also a recurring positive theme.
Nothing to show
I would wholeheartedly recommend this university to any prospective student. I spent some of my best years there as a student. The city is great, quite small and full of students, very easy to get around and offers excellent dining and party options for students and visitors alike. The University offers excellent education programme and I've found myself at a competitive advantage over peers almost everywhere I've been. And a lot of it comes from the great opportunities, knowledge and teamwork I gained at AUBG. Facilities are great and getting better, social life is amazing and accommodation is very adequate with lots of improvements being done throughout.
Agricultural University - Plovdiv is a leading university in the field of agrarian sciences in Bulgaria. The training is at a very high level. Teachers turn their attention individually to the training course. Halls are well-equipped with state-of-the-art equipment that allows for easier learning. There are good opportunities for specialization abroad.
The curriculum provides a comprehensive overview of various aspects within the specialty, making the degree highly attractive to employers in Bulgaria. Although challenging, pursuing their programs part-time can be more manageable. New Bulgarian University offers more hands-on experience, equipping students with specific skills relevant to the job market. The lecturers are also commendable, offering support and practical insights that make learning more applicable to real-world scenarios, enhancing both the academic and professional development of students.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
