Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey - ITESM vs Universidad Tecnológica de México - UNITEC vs Universidad Anáhuac vs Colegio Nacional de Educación Profesional Técnica - CONALEP vs ISDI Madrid Digital Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 149 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and knowledgeable professors
- +Diverse extracurricular activities and opportunities
- +High academic standards and real-world project focus
- +Quality professors with relevant industry experience
- +Flexible programs supporting work-study balance
- +Supportive environment and accessible education
- +Leadership and values development
- +Academic excellence and practical application
- +Supportive community and modern facilities
- +Accessible short career options with good teachers
- +Personal and academic improvement opportunities
- +Direct path to employment after high school
Nothing to show
- +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
- +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
- +Engaging hybrid learning format
Nothing to show
- -Lack of student support and unresponsive administration
- -Poor faculty engagement and effort
- -Failure to address student safety concerns
- -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
- -Facilities are consistently described as outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Overcrowded classrooms and insufficient resources negatively impact learning.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is evident.
- -Limited food variety and a small library with few books are dissatisfying.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Perceived lack of value for money.
Nothing to show
An analysis of university ratings reveals a generally positive profile. Facilities and location are standout areas, both scoring over 4.5. Student life and professors also received strong marks. Conversely, accommodation emerged as the weakest point among the evaluated aspects. Internationality and value for money are rated moderately well, falling between the highest and lowest scores.
This university demonstrates a strong academic and social environment, with notable strengths in Professors (4.6), Location (4.625), and Student Life (4.55). Facilities also score well at 4.3, contributing to a positive student experience. However, areas for development include Accomodation (3.875) and Internationality (3.7), representing the lowest-rated aspects among the surveyed categories. Value for money is rated at a solid 4.
This institution garners excellent scores, with accommodation standing out as its strongest area at 4.65625. Student life and value also received high marks. Professors represent the area with the lowest rating at 4.40625, though it remains a very positive score. Overall, the university demonstrates considerable strengths in most aspects evaluated.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its academic offerings and surrounding environment. Professors received a near-perfect score of 4.3, complemented by a highly rated location (4.1) and strong value for money (4.2). Student life also scored well at 3.89. Conversely, accommodation emerged as the primary area for improvement, with a rating of 2.8, followed by facilities at 3.1. Internationality stands at a moderate 3.2.
Nothing to show
With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.
Nothing to show
~98.6% of reviews are positive, highlighting great classes, supportive professors, and personal growth opportunities. A single negative review expressed concerns about student care and safety issues.
With an average rating of 4/5 from 11 reviews, ~74% are positive. Students appreciate the quality of professors and flexible study programs. There is no negative feedback.
With ~97% positive feedback and an average of 4.58/5, students praise academic excellence, leadership development, and integral personal growth programs. No negative reviews were recorded.
With an average rating of 4.32/5 from 31 reviews, approximately 97% are positive. Students praise accessible teachers and career opportunities. Some negative feedback notes small spaces and untidy bathrooms.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.
Nothing to show
ITESM is a college that greatly values student development in every aspect of their lives, from a deep and personal level up to the professional aspect of the University. The courses and classes have a modern way of teaching students different lessons and subjects in easy, fast and innovative ways in order to acquire as much information as possible, leaving space at the end of the career path to get a more deep and concentrated approach to the field of studies you wish to focus on. To finish it up there are hundreds of opportunities and activities to develop your personal self and your social abilities and connections; the School truly values the sense of entrepreneurship and social responsibility, among other core values, and it makes an effort to really make students feel like part of the TEC community through the years.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
