University of Copenhagen - KU vs Aarhus University - AU vs University College Capital - UCC vs Danish School of Media and Journalism - DMJX vs Copenhagen Business Academy
Side-by-side comparison from 200 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Expert, passionate instructors & supportive staff
- +Engaging, well-balanced curriculum with practical application
- +Ideal city location for opportunities & vibrant community
- +Approachable and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Supportive learning environment and community
- +Convenient location and urban setting
- +Engaged and skillful teachers, fostering a close-knit community.
- +High reputation and demanding admission
- +Valuable internships and international opportunities
- +Supportive and responsive teachers who guide learning
- +Development of independent and resourceful learning skills
- +Real-world company projects and teamwork focus
- +Practical, real-world projects and industry relevance
- +Accessible and supportive teachers
- +International learning environment and cultural exchange
- +Approachable and helpful professors
- +Practical, applicable course structure
- +Vibrant student life
- -Administrative and management issues, including unfair appeal procedures and corner-cutting.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources.
- -Poor job prospects and an academic system that doesn't reward hard work.
- -Administrative and management issues create significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -The academic environment and faculty engagement are disappointing.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Lack of effective communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Facilities and resources are frequently described as outdated or insufficient.
- -Course content and teaching methods are sometimes perceived as uninspiring or irrelevant.
- -Academic content is superficial and unclearly explained.
- -Teachers can be rude, unprofessional, and unclear.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a constant concern.
- -Administrative and management issues create unnecessary stress and frustration.
- -Lack of resources and support hinders academic progress.
- -Administrative and management issues create frustration and inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning and comfort.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are significant concerns.
This university garners high marks across most evaluated aspects. **Professors** and **Internationality** stand out with the strongest scores, indicating excellent faculty and a globally connected environment. **Accomodation** and **Student Life** received the lowest ratings, suggesting areas where improvements could be beneficial. Overall, the university presents a solid offering with particularly positive feedback regarding its academic and international dimensions.
Overall, this institution receives positive evaluations across multiple aspects. The strongest areas are its **Professors** (4.30) and **Facilities** (4.22), indicating excellent academic and resource provisions. **Location** (4.14) and **Value** (4.18) are also highly rated. **Student Life** (3.85) emerges as the comparatively weakest area, though still a respectable score, with **Accomodation** (3.94) and **Internationality** (4.03) performing moderately well.
This institution presents a uniformly undeveloped profile across all assessed aspects. Notably, all categories, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, received the lowest possible rating, indicating significant areas for development and no discernible strengths.
An examination of the university's performance reveals consistent mediocrity. Across all surveyed categories, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, the institution received a rating of zero. This indicates no identifiable strengths or weaknesses, with every aspect performing at the lowest possible level. The complete absence of positive or negative distinctions suggests a uniform and unexceptional standing.
This institution excels in its **location**, receiving a perfect score, and boasts impressive ratings for **internationality** and **facilities** alike. Student life also scores highly, indicating a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, **value** for money and the quality of **professors** and **accommodation** are areas that could see improvement, though still receiving moderate ratings.
Across surveyed categories, this institution excels in **Internationality (5)**, **Facilities (4.5)**, **Accomodation (4.5)**, and **Value (4.5)**. Professors also receive high marks at **4.5**. The university's weakest areas are **Location**, rated at **3**, and **Student Life**, scoring **3.5**.
This institution receives exceptional ratings for its **Facilities**, scoring a high 4.75. **Student Life** and **Value** are also strong points, both earning a respectable 4. While **Accomodation** and **Location** are decent, the university's **Internationality** stands out as a weaker area, receiving the lowest score of 2.75. **Professors** are rated moderately well.
With an average rating of 4.12/5 from 115 reviews, ~99% are positive. Students praise helpful advisors, passionate instructors, and the school's location. A small fraction experienced issues with MA degrees.
~99% of reviews are positive, highlighting flexible classes, urban settings, and approachable, knowledgeable lecturers. A small amount of negative feedback exists, with approximately 1% expressing regret about their experience.
With a 4/5 average rating and no negative feedback, the single review highlights a very positive experience. This student found teachers engaged and skillful, and appreciated the close-knit environment fostering interaction with other students and faculty.
With a single review, the Danish School of Media and Journalism has a 4/5 rating, indicating approximately 100% positive sentiment. The positive feedback highlights a strong reputation and a well-structured bachelor's program with internships.
With an average rating of 4/5, ~75% of reviews are positive, highlighting inspiring missions, responsive teachers, and practical company work. ~25% of feedback mentioned a desire for a more in-depth academic experience and clearer teaching.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive, representing 100%. Reviews highlight practical, industry-relevant education and helpful, available teachers.
With an average rating of 4/5, positive feedback (~100%) highlights professors' willingness to help and well-structured courses. Student life is also noted as amazing. No negative reviews were recorded.
Don't waste your money on this university's MA degrees. MA degrees are quite useless for job-hunting in Denmark as well, and it doesn't help that this university's — or perhaps it's the country in general — the academic system is built to (a) subject your grades to randomness, i.e. hard work and logical argumentation don't guarantee getting good grades; (b) protect errant university staff over students, with the appeal procedure being an utter sham; (c) cut ever more corners, with MA students having no thesis defence; and (d) treat non-EU students as cash cows to subsidise the university's rent, plus probably a myriad of other costs. What follows is a somewhat high-level elaboration of the above points. a. If you are used to the Anglo-American style of university, which is basically most of the Westernised world in this era, you would be surprised to learn that the Danish grading system — as implemented by this university — allows for multiple unpredictable variables that can unjustly lower your grades beyond belief. For example, there is always an external examiner involved in grading (together with the course instructor in question), but the Danish Examination Order grants the external examiner more power than the course instructor; this means that someone who wasn't following the process of the assignment/exam closely has more influence over the final grade than the course instructor. The official justification for this arrangement is that the grading would be fairer, but in my experience, it does the opposite: the grading is inherently unfairer this way. Even in academia, a piece of writing has to be targeted at the person who will be reading it; and because you don't usually know the identity of the external examiner until much later (e.g. 2–4 weeks before submission), it is difficult to prepare your assignment or exam in a way that would align with the preferences of the course instructor AND the external examiner. For non-EU citizens who mostly live and die by their grades (if the goal is to successfully enter huge international companies after higher education), this unfair grading system can really screw up your job prospects and livelihood in Denmark because you don't benefit from the Danish welfare state as much as the EU/EEA citizens do. European students (especially the Nordic ones) can afford to treat grades as "just numbers/letters on a piece of paper" because even if they get bad grades on their transcripts and have difficulty finding proper full-time jobs, they know that the Danish welfare state would financially support them. b. In relation to point (a), perhaps the most unpredictable variable in assignment/exam grading at this university is the quality of the graders themselves. As a native English speaker from Asia, I had to take an English proficiency test to apply for my MA degree programme — and I scored almost full marks for that test. However, some of the Danish instructors and examiners I have gotten during my studies here seem to be people who cannot argue (or even spell) properly in English... and they can get away with it. It's the typical Western mentality that someone from the West must be better in English than someone from Asia. Anyway, I went through the appeal procedure multiple times for some unfair grades that I received, with one particular appeal involving a course instructor who would very likely score lousily on an English proficiency test. To cut a long story short, no matter how much logic and specific evidence I used in my appeal argumentation, the university always sided with the university staff about whom I was complaining. The errant staff in question could rely on fallacies (e.g. cherry-picking of facts) and imprecise statements to explain why they gave my essay a bad grade, and they wound up being always right in the eyes of the university... because why oppose your own people, right? Oh, and let's not forget that it is difficult for Danish people in the public sector to get fired — which is probably the main reason why they can get away with giving bad grades for no good reason, AND not face any significant consequence for doing so. In short, the appeal procedure is an extreme waste of time and energy. It is a sham process whereby the student would be fighting against a system that is built to favour university staff by default. c. The University of Copenhagen is so cheapskate that MA students don't get to do the thesis defence due to cost-saving measures. It has been this way for years (and apparently it's the same with BA students), and the official justification is that their teaching staff don't have enough hours (time = money) to spare for thesis defences. What is weird is that certain normal courses get an oral "defence" as part of the final exam, but then the higher-stakes MA-thesis course gets no defence... yeah, go figure. You may think that the lack of an MA thesis defence is good because it means less work on your part, but when you consider what I have explained in points (a) and (b), this very lack of an MA thesis defence is what could royally screw up your job-hunting prospects as a non-EU foreigner in Denmark. The MA thesis grade is the first grade from the top in your degree transcript, so if you are unlucky enough to be on the losing end of points (a) and (b), you would end up applying to jobs with an ugly degree transcript: one that shows an unfairly low grade at the very top of the list of grades. And of course, HR personnel and hiring managers would not know (or bother to understand) that low grades from the University of Copenhagen could be the result of an inherently unfair grading system and/or the involvement of incompetent instructors-cum-examiners. Also, you only get a digital version of your MA degree upon graduation. The official reason from the Danish government is that this digitisation of degrees helps to modernise Danish society — but at this point, you probably can already tell this is just another cost-saving measure. This university will only continue to cut corners, and although the degree-digitisation affects non-MA students as well, MA students will — as non-STEM people — obviously take the brunt of these cuts. d. Non-EU students are treated as cash cows at this university. Many years ago, education used to be free for non-EU students in Denmark (just like how it has always been free for EU students), so one thing you have to get used to nowadays is that Denmark is economically similar to the USA (and other US-like societies) in its practical perception of foreigners as another revenue stream for schools. While the tuition fees for MA degrees at this university are not as astronomical as those in the USA, the financial cost is still rather significant for middle-class people from non-EU countries; and it was as though I was paying for something that is free. Not only was I paying for the services of certain questionable Danish instructors/examiners, but I was also paying for subpar academic resources. Once, there was a training session for some film production class, and the training was in relation to a piece of video-editing software. The training happened WITHOUT access to a computer lab — can you believe that? It happened as a lecture and live demonstration by (paid) student volunteers, with people in the audience (including me) taking notes as we eyeballed those student volunteers' clicking within the software's UI. I remember asking why we didn't have access to a computer lab for the training (because actually practising is better than eye power any day), and the official excuse was — you guessed it — a lack of resources. The university's software library was also mostly useless (in my experience). I tried to use the EndNote version available in the library, and the licence turned out to be expired. In the end, I simply used Zotero, which is freely available on the Internet. The university's digital library of academic literature was only slightly better in the sense that it wasn't mostly useless. Generally, I could find and download most journal articles and e-books that I needed for my academic research; but there were multiple occasions when I found great journal articles that I couldn't download because the University of Copenhagen wasn't subscribed to such-and-such academic service. Notably, I could not even access the premium version of the Chicago Manual of Style (a prominent academic reference style) to check for reference rules because the university lacked an online subscription to the manual. On another occasion, I found an excellent journal article from Cambridge University that I could not download but badly wanted, and I had to ask my course instructor (who used to teach at Cambridge University) if he was able to download it for me. When you also consider that this university has been having rental woes for a long time now, plus what I have explained in point (c), it becomes even clearer why I say that non-EU students are treated as cash cows. Seeing how financially challenged the University of Copenhagen is, I would not be surprised if payments from non-EU students are being used to subsidise non-rental costs as well: #FridayBar fridges in on-campus departmental pantries, maybe? MORAL OF THE STORY: Paying for an MA degree from this university for the sake of getting your foot in the door of the Danish job market would be a pricey move that could involve infuriating instances of injustice. You should consider alternative ways to enter the Danish job market.
The MSc in Finance programme is one of the toughest of the Business School, therefore, it is a high level programme due to the level of the admitted students and the work required. However, I think the course is way too academic-focused (theoretical rather than practical). I like the competitiveness of the programme and of the students. I would definitely recommend it to a European friend (it is free tuition for EU citizens) but perhaps not for a non-European friend. The campus is small and rather old, but good enough to do all student-related tasks. The night life in Aarhus can be quite nice, it is a very young city where 15% of the city are students or young adults. I think the Career Services could play a bigger role and have more on campus recruiting as Aarhus is a leading university in Denmark.
Nothing to show
The Danish School of Media and Journalism has a very good reputation. It has a reputation (in Denmark at least) that it is hard to be accepted to the school. There are different educations offered at DMJX and I took a bachelor in communication. It's a broad education which includes 2 times 6 months internships and an international semester. It's 7 semesters long - 3,5 years. I must admit despite the school's good reputation a lot of things didn't go according to plan and at the point, the classes were too easy. The school had bad communication itself; even kept in mind, that the communications education is new there - I hope they have improved this. Other than that it IS a good school, which will soon move to new buildings from the iconic one it "lives" in now.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
First of all, the university is nowhere near as international as it portrays itself to be; there are less international students than you would expect. In terms of the teachers, I can honestly say I had one good teacher per semester. The others ranged from bad to completely unprofessional. Also with the planning of exams and classes, it sometimes made me wonder how the people behind this can be a part of the management department. However, on the bright side, I did like the idea of working in study groups and having to do all sorts of projects - that helps with the practical aspects of teaching. Another thing that I'd praise is the cafeteria, as they offer fresh and diverse food.
