Riga Technical University - RTU vs RISEBA University vs Latvia University of Agriculture - LLU vs Turiba University vs University of Latvia - LU
Side-by-side comparison from 51 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong technical and engineering focus with practical application
- +Professional and understandable professors and staff
- +Modern facilities and well-organized, clear teaching approach
- +Flexible study schedules and international opportunities
- +Interactive learning with dedicated and supportive professors
- +Good facilities and English-taught programs
- +High-quality, practical education with up-to-date content
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty and staff
- +Affordable tuition and positive learning environment
- +Quality of education and engaging courses
- +Convenient and pleasant campus environment
- +Well-organized educational process
- +Supportive lecturers and organized study process
- +Abundant extracurricular events and opportunities
- +Modernizing facilities and convenient location
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Lack of helpfulness from staff and professors
- -Frequent rent increases for university dorms
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are major drawbacks.
- -Poor teaching quality and unclear academic expectations lead to dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues create significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder learning.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly implemented.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a common complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent frustration.
- -Lack of career support and unclear future prospects are disappointing.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are frequently mentioned.
- -Some professors are perceived as unhelpful or lacking engagement.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This university garners excellent marks in several key areas, with Location receiving the highest rating. Professors, Student Life, and Internationality also score strongly. Conversely, Accommodations present the weakest area, receiving a notably lower score than other aspects. Facilities and Value are rated mid-range, indicating good but not exceptional performance in those categories.
Across several key metrics, this institution demonstrates exceptional strength. Facilities, professors, location, student life, and internationality all received a perfect score of five. The only area not reaching the highest mark was accommodation, rated at a still solid four. Overall, the university offers a highly positive experience with excellent value for its students.
Academic offerings and value stand out, with Professors scoring an excellent 4.4 and Value receiving a perfect 4. The university also fares well in Facilities, Location, Accomodation, and Internationality, all rated at a respectable 3.6. Student Life, however, emerges as the area with the lowest rating, coming in at 3.25, suggesting room for improvement in extracurricular and social aspects.
Receiving top marks across the board, this institution demonstrates exceptional strength in every evaluated area. Its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated a perfect 5 out of 5. There are no discernible weak areas based on these ratings, indicating a consistently outstanding experience for students.
This university receives commendations in several key areas, with an outstanding 4.5 for Location. Professors and Value also scored highly at 4.38. Facilities and Student Life are well-regarded with a 4.25 rating. Conversely, Accomodation and Internationality represent the weaker aspects, with scores of 3.91 and 3.85 respectively.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With a 4.07 average rating, ~82% of 28 reviews are positive, highlighting strong engineering and technical programs with practical learning and modern facilities. A small percentage of feedback notes administrative delays and unhelpful staff.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students praise the good teaching level, professor support, and international opportunities. Programs taught in English and interactive learning environments are also highlighted.
With 100% positive feedback from 6 reviews, students highlight life-changing experiences, enriching and well-structured programs, and competitive costs. The faculty is consistently praised for being knowledgeable and supportive, contributing to a positive learning environment.
With a 5/5 average rating from one review, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. This feedback highlights a pleasant campus, organized education, and satisfying quality of knowledge.
With an average rating of 4.21/5, ~93% of reviews are positive, highlighting supportive lecturers, an organized academic environment, and convenient location. A single negative review found standards low compared to others.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
My opinion of RTU is good. There is definitely a lot of room for improvement with the organization and the overall work completed with the staff. The university offers a good environment with diversity and an inviting campus.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I'm just started studying Mathematics. The matherial, which lectors are giving to us, and the way of the studying is simple. Also there is options to study by ourselves in rooms with noise isolation. And also I can see, that the university collect a advises from students to develop.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
