London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs University of Derby - UoD vs Nottingham Trent University - NTU vs Cardiff University vs University of West London

Side-by-side comparison from 755 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Le Cordon Bleu Paris (4.70)
London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE: wins 2/7 categories
University of Derby - UoD: wins 0/7 categories
Nottingham Trent University - NTU: wins 1/7 categories
Cardiff University: wins 2/7 categories
University of West London: wins 0/7 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 1/7 categories
University of London: wins 1/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics
Derby, The United Kingdom
4.40
Read more reviews
34 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Engineering and Computer Science
Nottingham, The United Kingdom
4.40
Read more reviews
106 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Management and Marketing
Cardiff, The United Kingdom
4.50
Read more reviews
217 reviews
×
Best programme: Law
London, The United Kingdom
4.40
Read more reviews
51 reviews
×
Best programme: Artificial Intelligence
4.70
Top
Read more reviews
9 reviews
×
Best programme: Culinary Arts
London, The United Kingdom
4.60
Read more reviews
16 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Law LLB
Category ratings
Facilities
4.04
4.32
4.53
4.56
Win
4.47
4.56
4.30
Location
4.78
Win
4.21
4.66
4.66
4.48
4.78
4.36
Professors
4.26
4.30
4.27
4.48
4.48
4.67
Win
4.31
Internationality
4.80
Win
4.21
4.21
4.48
4.49
4.67
4.38
Student life
3.63
4.03
4.67
Win
4.60
4.25
4.00
4.50
Value
4.04
4.21
4.25
4.41
4.35
4.00
4.56
Win
Accommodation
3.78
4.03
4.08
4.26
Win
3.93
3.22
3.75
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Expert and experienced faculty
  • +Supportive and collaborative community atmosphere
  • +Diverse and flexible learning and assessment methods
  • +Excellent lecturers and quality education
  • +Strong student support and feeling heard
  • +Modern facilities and practical, employability-focused learning
  • +Excellent teaching quality and passionate, approachable lecturers
  • +Strong career support and industry connections
  • +Engaging course content with real-world application
  • +Balanced academic and social experience with city life
  • +Good academic support and course content
  • +Campus proximity to city centre and positive atmosphere
  • +Industry connections and career opportunities
  • +Engaging and relevant curriculum
  • +Supportive staff and positive campus environment
  • +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
  • +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
  • +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network
  • +Strong academic resources and LSE curriculum
  • +Effective administration and flexible learning environment
  • +Cooperative professors and engaging teaching methods
Cons
  • -Poor teaching quality and lack of structure in academic programs.
  • -Inadequate support services and limited social opportunities.
  • -High fees with perceived low value and administrative issues.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and lecturer availability, including frequent reliance on pre-recorded materials.
  • -Misleading course promises and unexpected shifts to online learning.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance detract from the learning environment.
  • -Overcrowded classes and lack of individual attention negatively impact learning.
  • -Poor quality of teaching and insufficient learning resources.
  • -Lack of support and consideration for student well-being, exacerbated by external disruptions.
  • -Substandard student experience due to COVID-19 and strikes.
  • -Administrative and management issues create frequent problems.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Course content is irrelevant or outdated.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Lack of communication and transparency causes frustration.
Rating summary
What students say

Perceived strengths of this institution lie significantly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving top marks. Conversely, **Student Life** emerges as the area with the lowest reported satisfaction. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Accomodation, and Value fall within a moderate to good range, indicating generally positive feedback across these aspects.

With most categories scoring well above 4.0, this university demonstrates robust strengths, particularly in **Facilities** (4.32), closely followed by **Professors** (4.30). **Location**, **Internationality**, and **Value** also received consistently high marks at 4.21. The areas with the most room for improvement, though still rated positively, are **Student Life** and **Accomodation**, both hovering around the 4.03 mark.

This institution garners impressive scores, particularly in **location** and **student life**, both exceeding 4.6. **Facilities** also receive a high mark at 4.5. While **accommodation** scores slightly lower at 4.08, it remains a respectable rating. Other areas like professors, internationality, and value are all rated favorably, demonstrating a well-rounded university experience.

Boasting strong performance across many aspects, this institution particularly excels in its **Location** and **Student Life**, both scoring above 4.6. **Facilities** and **Internationality** also receive commendations. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerges as the lowest-rated area, though still a respectable 4.26. Overall, the university demonstrates a solid and well-rounded offering to its students.

This university demonstrates strong performance in several key areas, with exceptionally high marks for Internationality (4.49) and Professors (4.48). Facilities and Location also received very favorable scores. Student Life and Value are well-regarded, though Accomodation presents as the weakest area with a rating of 3.93.

This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.

This institution receives very positive feedback, particularly excelling in **Student Life** and **Value**, both scoring 4.5 or higher. **Location** and **Internationality** also demonstrate considerable strengths. Conversely, **Accommodations** received the lowest rating among the surveyed areas, indicating potential room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience. Ratings for **Facilities** and **Professors** are consistently strong.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Most reviews (~74%) are positive, praising academic reputation, expert faculty, and excellent resources. A small percentage (~3.4%) express dissatisfaction with lecturing quality, course structure, or career services.

Most reviews (around 91%) are highly positive, praising incredible lecturers, top-notch facilities, and strong support. A small percentage (around 3%) mentioned issues like inconsistent grading or lecturers not showing up.

With ~99% positive feedback, students praise exceptional teaching quality, approachable lecturers, and well-structured courses. Emphasis is placed on industry connections, career support, and engaging campus life. Minimal negative feedback was reported.

With a 4.49/5 average, ~98% of reviews are positive, highlighting a good balance of education, social life, and city activities. A small fraction (~2%) mention issues with course content delivery and a lack of support during disruptive periods.

With a 4.45/5 average rating from 51 reviews, ~88% of feedback is positive. Students frequently praise the great experiences, strong industry connections leading to job placements, relevant curriculum, and supportive staff. No negative feedback was recorded.

All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.

University of London reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100% with 4-5 stars), with an average rating of 4.63. Students praise job-ready skills, cooperative professors, excellent VLE, and comprehensive programs with LSE curriculum. Some noted challenges with online learning and lack of face-to-face interaction.

Rating distribution
5★
34%
56%
51%
64%
57%
67%
63%
4★
44%
32%
42%
24%
31%
33%
38%
3★
19%
9%
7%
10%
12%
0%
0%
2★
2%
3%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
0%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Great Experience

LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.

Derby is Lovely

Derby is amazing, they are super organized and is great with communication. They ensure that all their students feel heard, safe, and involved in everything. I'm in my second year, and I have no complaints thus far.

Welcoming University!

Before starting university, I was very nervous, however excited to start. From the first day Trent made the whole experience of starting university easy and enjoyable. As someone who loves being at home, the idea of moving to a different city was very daunting, but Trent made me feel welcome. Nottingham is a great city and has many social events to attend. Additionally, the university holds many events throughout the year so that you can meet new people. I'm about to go into my third year studying Design for TV & Film, and I feel like the course has helped me to grow so much as a person, and a designer. I would highly recommend this university.

High class

A fantastic university of high class, high ambition and high prospects for the future. I'm proud to have cardiff on my cv and am privileged to be part if such a fantastic institution, I wouldn't have rather spent my four years at undergraduate level anywhere else.

Nothing to show

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

Great

In my opinion choosing UOL for my undergrad was the best decision of my life. It not only taught be job ready skills it taught me how to approach a difficult task and win. The VLE portal was just awesome. The VLE or virtual learning environment provided me with necessary course and study material. Which was very helpful for a better understanding of Law.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close