Universidad de Margarita - UNIMAR vs Cranfield University vs Universidad Politécnica Territorial De Los Altos Mirandinos - UPTAMCA vs Admiral Makarov National University of Shipbuilding - NUOS vs Davangere University
Side-by-side comparison from 31 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging campus life
- +Focus on student well-being
- +Strong postgraduate focus and mature atmosphere
- +World-class facilities and industry partnerships
- +Excellent career services and renowned faculty
- +Qualified and supportive teachers
- +Quality professional development
- +Valuable practical experience
- +Impressive, research-engaged professors and high-level theoretical preparation.
- +Good programs and supportive class teachers.
- +Experienced, friendly lecturers and excellent education.
- +Well-maintained facilities.
- +Practical, interdisciplinary teaching
- +Pleasant atmosphere with lecturers and students
- +Good cafeteria food options
- +personalized attention and professor accessibility
- +flexible scheduling options
- +strong business, law, and public affairs programs
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are disappointing.
- -Poor communication and a lack of support from faculty are concerning.
- -Administrative and management issues create frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a common complaint.
- -A lack of clear communication and support is frustrating.
- -Administrative and management issues neglect several careers.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of attention to certain academic areas are problematic.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Ineffective teaching and unengaging curriculum lead to dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are a major problem.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are prevalent.
- -Material is not fully in English and local students are insular.
- -Teachers lack enthusiasm and suggest inadequate translation tools.
- -The program has too many minor subjects, hindering focus on core learning.
- -Administrative & management issues are a major source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
Overall, this institution presents a solid academic and living environment. Its student life and accommodation stand out with high marks. However, the university shows moderate performance in key areas such as facilities, professors, location, internationality, and value, indicating room for improvement in these aspects.
This institution excels in its Facilities and Professors, both scoring a strong 4.33. Student Life, Internationality, and Value are also well-regarded, each receiving a 3.83. Accommodation is rated a solid 4. The university's weakest area, however, is Location, with a score of 2.67.
This institution excels in several key areas, particularly its location and student life, both rated at an impressive 4.85. Professors also receive outstanding scores (4.825). However, significant challenges are evident in accommodation and internationality, with ratings of 2.25 and 1.775 respectively. The university offers good value at 4.05 and solid facilities at 4.6.
This institution presents a uniform set of ratings, with no particular area standing out as exceptionally strong or weak. All surveyed aspects, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, have received identical scores. This suggests a consistent, though unexceptional, performance across the board, offering no clear strengths or weaknesses to highlight based on the provided data.
This institution garners exceptional marks, particularly excelling in Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Internationality, all receiving a perfect score. Accomodation and Location also score well, indicating solid offerings in these areas. The university also demonstrates excellent Value, with a 5-star rating.
This institution excels in its **Location** and **Accomodation**, both scoring a strong 4.5 and 4 respectively. The **Professors** and **Student Life** also receive a solid 3.5. However, **Facilities** and **Internationality** present areas for improvement, each receiving a lower rating of 2.5. The university offers good **Value** at 4.
With excellent scores in several key areas, this institution shines particularly brightly for its professors and accommodation, both earning a perfect five. Students also appreciate its international outlook and strong student life, with facilities and overall value receiving solid four-star ratings. The location is its least celebrated aspect, marked by a three-star score.
This university has one review, which is positive with an average rating of 4/5. The positive feedback highlights good campus life, though one student felt the administration prioritized payment over student development.
With an average rating of 4.33/5, ~92% of reviews are positive. Students praise world-class research facilities, industry partnerships, and excellent career services. No negative feedback was reported.
Approximately 70% of reviews are positive, highlighting good teachers and skill development. A smaller percentage of feedback mentions administrative issues and neglect of some programs. The average rating is 3.92/5.
With a single review, this university receives a perfect 5/5 average rating. The feedback highlights impressive professorial staff and high-level theoretical preparation, though it notes inadequate practical training.
The sole reviewer awarded a 5/5 rating, expressing satisfaction with experienced lecturers and excellent education. Positive feedback highlights good class conditions and friendly lecturers. There are no negative reviews.
With an average rating of 3/5, university student feedback is split evenly. Positive comments highlight practical teaching and a pleasant atmosphere, while negative points focus on limited space and international student integration challenges.
With an average rating of 4/5, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight a sold educational experience in fields like business and law, appreciating small class sizes, personalized attention, and flexible scheduling.
Nothing to show
For the campus is going 10/10, a lovely place, comfortable ambience and cozy life you can have. Especially people who want switch from capital city to tranquil area. The natural campus provides soothe accommodations, facilities and communities. For the course is going to 7/10, sufficient practical and hands-on programme while your main modules. However, some styles of professor you might take more time to familiar with it. Most of modules blend academic logical and company's project. Moreover, the UK's MSc has just one year, so it makes you feel intensive and stressful. Especially some assignments are not easy to accomplishment in a limited time. For the communities, includes club, social life and corporate competition, could be 8/10. In Cranfield, as an unique campus which only provides MSc
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
What I liked: -Sustainable concerns of the school -Partnership with Social Education University in order to deliver social related modules What I didn't like while being registered to an international program: -Some material modules are still in German, some teachers suggested to translate them on Deepl -Local students are not very open-minded... tend to create their own circles and don't include international students -Even though the program is supposed to be taught in English, more minors are given in German than in English, which reduces the minors choices to 3 only... To improve: -Class materials and/or explanations can be given in English even though the student asked a question in Swiss-German (more inclusive) -More inclusive events, even though students can not be forced to take part in them, help international students to be included by locals Recommend? : I do not think that I would recommend international students to study there. I studied one year in Geneva, and the international program there is more inclusive than the one in Lucerne.
Nothing to show
