University Of Central Punjab - UCP vs University College Lahore vs King Edward Medical University vs Beaconhouse National University vs Skans School of Accountancy - Nil

Side-by-side comparison from 50 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Skans School of Accountancy - Nil (4.70)
University Of Central Punjab - UCP: wins 1/7 categories
University College Lahore: wins 3/7 categories
King Edward Medical University: wins 1/7 categories
Beaconhouse National University: wins 2/7 categories
Skans School of Accountancy - Nil: wins 0/7 categories
Al-Aleem Medical College: wins 0/7 categories
Lahore Leads University: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Computer Engineering
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Best programme: Bachelor of Medicine
Best programme: Applied Psychology
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.44
4.00
4.33
4.50
Win
4.00
Not rated
3.00
Location
4.31
Win
3.50
3.67
3.71
3.67
Not rated
3.00
Professors
4.45
5.00
Win
4.33
4.38
3.67
Not rated
4.00
Internationality
3.82
4.50
Win
4.33
2.88
3.33
Not rated
1.00
Student life
4.26
3.50
4.00
4.63
Win
3.67
Not rated
3.00
Value
4.06
4.50
Win
4.33
4.13
3.67
Not rated
4.00
Accommodation
3.97
4.00
4.33
Win
3.00
4.00
Not rated
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality, practical teaching and experienced faculty
  • +Positive and welcoming campus environment with good facilities
  • +Opportunities for financial stability and career advancement
  • +Quality education and diverse programmes
  • +Supportive environment and extracurriculars
  • +Adequate resources for specific fields
  • +Experienced faculty and practical learning methods
  • +Well-equipped facilities and convenient amenities
  • +Prestigious reputation and challenging yet rewarding academic environment
  • +Supportive and judgment-free faculty fostering practical learning
  • +Vibrant campus environment with diverse extracurricular activities
  • +Emphasis on academic growth and personal development opportunities
  • +Knowledgeable and passionate instructors
  • +Suitable program recommendations
  • +Professional environment

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Poor basic facilities and uncomfortable living conditions
  • -Overcrowded spaces and limited study areas
  • -Low quality canteen food and inadequate prayer facilities
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a consistent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources negatively impact the learning environment.
  • -Inflexible course structures and unclear communication cause student dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a significant problem.
  • -Lack of engagement and ineffective teaching methods are disappointing.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to frustration.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This university garners strong marks, particularly for its professors and facilities, both scoring above 4.4. Student life and location also receive favorable ratings. Areas for potential improvement include internationality and accommodation, which are rated lower than other aspects. The overall value is considered good, with a rating above 4.0.

Performance across various university aspects reveals a strong academic focus, with professors receiving the highest rating of 5. Facilities and accommodation are well-regarded, both scoring 4, complemented by an excellent internationality score of 4.5. Value for money also stands out with a rating of 4.5. The weakest areas, though still respectable, are location and student life, each rated at 3.5.

With excellent scores across most aspects, this institution particularly shines in its **Facilities, Professors, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value**, all receiving approximately 4.3 out of 5. Student life also scores well at a solid 4. The weakest area, though still respectable, is **Location**, which garnered a rating of 3.7.

This university demonstrates exceptional strengths in student life and facilities, both scoring above 4.5. Its professors and value for money also received solid ratings. However, accommodation and internationality are notable areas for improvement, with scores significantly lower than other categories. Location also received a moderate rating.

This university demonstrates notable strengths in its facilities and accommodation, both receiving high marks. Its location, student life, and value for money are also well-regarded, averaging a solid 3.67. The weakest area identified is internationality, which scores slightly lower than other aspects. Overall, the university presents a generally positive profile with specific areas of excellence.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 94% of reviews are positive, highlighting impressive teaching, financial stability, and a good campus experience. A small percentage of negative feedback mentioned issues with facilities and overcrowding.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, the university is highly praised. Reviews highlight quality education, diverse degree options, and various extracurricular activities. Engineering students specifically note adequate lab equipment and qualified faculty.

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%), with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise experienced teachers, modern facilities, and the university's prestige, particularly highlighting the attached hospitals and transport.

All eight reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.25/5. Students highlight positive academic growth, knowledgeable and supportive faculty, and a vibrant campus environment with ample extracurricular activities.

With a high average rating of 4.67/5, 100% of feedback is positive. Students praise professors' strong subject knowledge and passion, and appreciate personalized program recommendations that align with budget and facilities.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
48%
50%
33%
25%
67%
0%
0%
4★
39%
50%
67%
75%
33%
0%
0%
3★
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
2★
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
They could not care less about your education

One of the worst universities i have ever been to. It was a huge mistake to study. They cannot even provide the basic facilities. No trees no AC for students in halls. Canteen food may cause food poisoning. In month of june and july it gets unbearable. Their prayer area is a JOKE, designated in second basement in a corner of parking garage where we pray for jummah and you cannot even imagine how bad it gets when 200 people pray together without ac or fans. I have not even started on the staff yet and this is how bad it is. PLEASE whatever you do dont take admission here. My entire degree felt like it was prison camp. They are creating building on top of building but they cannot create a simple garden or masjid. All they want is your money and could not care less about your education.

Nothing to show

Medical university

For me, it was a big achievement to get admission at the King Edward medical university. You really have to work hard to reach this institute and even harder to survive here. But the situation is not bad.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close