emlyon business school vs Nazarbayev University - NU vs Kostanay Engineering and Economics University vs Islamic Azad University of Islamshahr vs Sophia University
Side-by-side comparison from 115 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical and international programs with diverse students
- +Valuable professional experience through internships and work-study
- +Supportive environment for personal and professional development
- +Engaging teaching with real-world relevance
- +Supportive and expert faculty
- +Enriching campus life and culture
- +Practical, hands-on learning with relevant industry skills.
- +Accessible and flexible learning options, including distance education and technology.
- +Supportive faculty and opportunities for student leadership and development.
Nothing to show
- +Well-organized world-class university with good management and course structures.
- +Strong international environment with diverse student body and cultural exchange.
- +Encouraging professors and enriching extracurricular activities like workshops and study trips.
- +Knowledgeable and committed lecturers with effective teaching methods
- +Positive learning environment fostering growth and development
- +Strong academic quality and resources available
- +Strong engineering and academic programs
- +Supportive professors and faculty
- +Opportunities for practical and research-based learning
- -Lack of practical value and shallow content in courses.
- -Unfair and frustrating grading, especially for group projects.
- -Disappointing professor engagement and program support.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues create significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning and engagement.
- -Lack of clear communication and support leads to student dissatisfaction.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative & management issues
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance
- -Unresponsive or unhelpful instructors
- -Outdated facilities and technology are a frequent complaint.
- -Students express frustration with administrative and management issues.
- -Course content and teaching quality are often seen as lacking relevance or effectiveness.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning and comfort.
- -Lack of adequate support and clear communication is a recurring problem.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its internationality and location, both scoring above 4.5. Student life and value also received positive marks, exceeding 4.2 and 4.4 respectively. However, accommodation presents as the weakest area, with the lowest rating of approximately 3.94. Facilities and professors also received solid, though slightly lower, scores in comparison.
This institution receives excellent feedback, particularly for its **Accomodation**, which is rated the highest at 4.625. **Facilities** and **Student Life** also score remarkably well, both above 4.57. Conversely, **Location** emerges as the lowest-rated aspect, with a score of 3.97. Other areas like Professors, Internationality, and Value are all rated favorably above 4.36.
Presenting a uniform score of zero across all surveyed categories, this university demonstrates a consistent lack of exceptional performance in any given area. From facilities and professors to location and student life, no aspect emerged as a particular strength. Similarly, accommodation, internationality, and overall value also received no positive distinction, indicating a consistent absence of standout features or areas of excellence according to the ratings provided.
Nothing to show
This institution garners outstanding marks across most aspects. Facilities, professors, location, accommodation, and internationality all received perfect scores, indicating exceptional strengths in these areas. Student life, while still very positive, presents the sole area with a slightly lower rating, though it remains highly favorable. The overall value is also rated excellently.
This institution boasts impressive scores, particularly excelling in **Facilities** and **Value**, both scoring 4.53. **Location** also received a strong rating of 4.5. **Professors** and **Accomodation** earned solid marks around 4.27 and 4.07 respectively, with **Internationality** at a respectable 4. The area with the lowest rating is **Student Life**, coming in at 3.93.
This university demonstrates strong performance in value, with a rating of 4.29, and equally high marks for professors and location, both at 4.14. Student life and internationality also score well at 4.0. While accommodation receives a respectable 3.71, the facilities appear to be the weakest area, scoring 3.43.
The vast majority of university students have a positive experience, highlighting academic rigor, practical learning, and international environments. A small fraction of reviews mention disappointment with course content and grading.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%), with a 4.43 average rating. Students praise well-rounded education, engaging professors, lively campus life, and excellent facilities.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, 100% of reviews are positive. Students appreciate distance learning, practical application, entrepreneurship skills, and challenging tasks from instructors.
Nothing to show
All three reviews are positive, resulting in a perfect 5/5 average rating. Students highlight the university's strong international environment, well-organized management, and good course structures.
With 15 reviews averaging 4.4/5 stars, ~100% are positive. Students praise knowledgeable lecturers, good learning environments, and campus life. No negative feedback was recorded.
All 7 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.29/5. Students highlight strong engineering programs, supportive faculty, and opportunities for practical and research-based learning. Some mention a need for better facilities and updated administrative processes.
Nothing to show
I am a graduate of Master in Public Administration, year of 2019. The program was amazing as well as academic team of the School of Public Policy. The program is designed for working professionals with various backgrounds and interests which makes this program unique. Your groupmates are going to be from different age groups and work environments, but they will all share the same goal of succeeding in their career as well as sharpening their skills. Also this kind of diverse environment gives you a great chance to learn about other’s experiences and grasp an opinion on how dilemmas in civil service or public policy are solved in their organizations and companies. Professor’s were great from the very first day, and became our friends by the end of the program. All the books and materials used were in compliance with the international best practices and this opinion comes from a person who did his bachelor’s in California back in 2015. If you are seeking for a program that can challenge your professionalism do not hesitate to apply for this program or choose NU as your next place to start your studies.
Hello! I studied at this university from 2009 to 2012, specializing in the organization of transportation, motion and the exploration of transport. It was a bachelor. I entered the university after graduating from college in this speciality, and I particularly liked that the teachers tried to expand their knowledge and gave tasks to complicate their implementation. Also worth mentioning is that I was given the opportunity to be the first chairman of the student council of the campus and develop its charter.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show