Nazarbayev University - NU vs First Pavlov State Medical University of St. Petersburg vs Kostanay Engineering and Economics University vs Offenburg University of Applied Sciences vs Nova Southeastern University - NSU Florida
Side-by-side comparison from 52 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging teaching with real-world relevance
- +Supportive and expert faculty
- +Enriching campus life and culture
- +Strong medical programmes
- +Useful knowledge acquisition
- +Practical, hands-on learning with relevant industry skills.
- +Accessible and flexible learning options, including distance education and technology.
- +Supportive faculty and opportunities for student leadership and development.
Nothing to show
- +Supportive staff and personal growth opportunities
- +Engaging social events and teacher availability
- +Strong academic programs and smaller class sizes
- +Modern campus and well-equipped facilities
- +High-quality, progressive academic programs and updated curriculum
- +Supportive and professional faculty and staff
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -The curriculum lacks practical application and relevance.
- -Administrative and management issues create significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning and engagement.
- -Lack of clear communication and support leads to student dissatisfaction.
Nothing to show
- -Exaggerated claims and unmet expectations.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and unresponsive administration create frustration.
- -Lack of clear academic support and guidance leaves students feeling lost.
Nothing to show
This institution receives excellent feedback, particularly for its **Accomodation**, which is rated the highest at 4.625. **Facilities** and **Student Life** also score remarkably well, both above 4.57. Conversely, **Location** emerges as the lowest-rated aspect, with a score of 3.97. Other areas like Professors, Internationality, and Value are all rated favorably above 4.36.
Overall, this university received a rating of zero across all surveyed categories, indicating a complete lack of positive attributes in every area. No particular strength or weakness stands out, as all aspects of the institution appear to be equally lacking.
Presenting a uniform score of zero across all surveyed categories, this university demonstrates a consistent lack of exceptional performance in any given area. From facilities and professors to location and student life, no aspect emerged as a particular strength. Similarly, accommodation, internationality, and overall value also received no positive distinction, indicating a consistent absence of standout features or areas of excellence according to the ratings provided.
Nothing to show
This institution generally scores well across key aspects. Its strongest areas include Location and Internationality, both receiving a high rating of 4.57. Professors are also highly regarded at 4.43. Facilities and Student Life are rated similarly, at 4.29 and 4.14 respectively, with Accommodation also at 4.14. The sole area scoring lower than the rest is Value, which received a rating of 4.
An assessment of the university reveals a highly international environment, with a near-perfect score for Internationality. Professors, Student Life, and Value also received excellent ratings. However, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring significantly lower than other categories. Facilities are rated well, but not exceptionally.
Nothing to show
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%), with a 4.43 average rating. Students praise well-rounded education, engaging professors, lively campus life, and excellent facilities.
With a 4/5 average rating, this university has positive feedback, with one reviewer highlighting useful knowledge gained. Negative feedback is minimal.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, 100% of reviews are positive. Students appreciate distance learning, practical application, entrepreneurship skills, and challenging tasks from instructors.
Nothing to show
Approximately 86% of reviews are positive, highlighting personal and professional growth, supportive staff, and academic opportunities. One negative review cited exaggeration of campus amenities and a disappointing experience.
All 7 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students praise the modern campus, well-equipped facilities, updated curriculum, and professional faculty. They also highlight progressive programs, student well-being initiatives, and opportunities for career development.
Nothing to show
I am a graduate of Master in Public Administration, year of 2019. The program was amazing as well as academic team of the School of Public Policy. The program is designed for working professionals with various backgrounds and interests which makes this program unique. Your groupmates are going to be from different age groups and work environments, but they will all share the same goal of succeeding in their career as well as sharpening their skills. Also this kind of diverse environment gives you a great chance to learn about other’s experiences and grasp an opinion on how dilemmas in civil service or public policy are solved in their organizations and companies. Professor’s were great from the very first day, and became our friends by the end of the program. All the books and materials used were in compliance with the international best practices and this opinion comes from a person who did his bachelor’s in California back in 2015. If you are seeking for a program that can challenge your professionalism do not hesitate to apply for this program or choose NU as your next place to start your studies.
Nothing to show
Hello! I studied at this university from 2009 to 2012, specializing in the organization of transportation, motion and the exploration of transport. It was a bachelor. I entered the university after graduating from college in this speciality, and I particularly liked that the teachers tried to expand their knowledge and gave tasks to complicate their implementation. Also worth mentioning is that I was given the opportunity to be the first chairman of the student council of the campus and develop its charter.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show