GBSB Global Business School vs UIC Barcelona vs Johan Cruyff Institute vs Universitat de Girona vs Escuela Superior de Arte y Diseño de Olot
Side-by-side comparison from 143 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging and knowledgeable professors
- +Diverse and high-quality student community
- +Well-structured learning and accessible resources
- +Excellent academic programs and knowledgeable, kind professors.
- +Supportive and collaborative student atmosphere.
- +Strong preparation for career success and international outlook.
- +Specialized sports management content and expert professors
- +Valuable industry connections and networking opportunities
- +Welcoming atmosphere and excellent staff support
- +Excellent professors and engaging campus life
- +Balanced academic rigor with social enjoyment
- +Welcoming community and beautiful campus environment
- +Supportive and personal teacher relationships
- +Balance of creativity and practical application
- +Culturally diverse environment and international campus access
- +Supportive and organized academic environment with helpful instructors
- +Opportunities for career advancement and independent learning
- +Teacher dedication and real-world focus
- +Integrated and close learning environment
- +Growing campus and accessible transportation
- -Poor academic quality and irrelevant degrees.
- -Inadequate facilities and lack of administrative support.
- -Poor organization and unfulfilled internship promises.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Lack of support and indifferent attitude from staff create a negative experience.
- -Poor quality of instruction and unengaging student discussions.
- -Ineffective project management and lack of professional experience among peers.
- -Uncaring and unmotivated instructors.
- -Repetitive campus life.
- -Excessive administrative burden and unclear communication are frustrating.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities are a significant drawback.
- -The curriculum lacks relevance and practical application for future careers.
- -Lack of extracurriculars and limited opportunities for lower-year students.
- -Poor campus environment and a perceived low academic standard.
- -Poor communication and lack of transparency from administration
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities
- -Overcrowded classes and insufficient resources
This university demonstrates outstanding strengths in its **Internationality**, receiving a near-perfect score, and its **Location** is also highly praised. The quality of its **Professors** is another area of significant achievement. Conversely, **Accomodation** appears to be the weakest aspect, with a considerably lower rating. Other areas like Facilities, Student Life, and Value fall within a moderate range.
The university demonstrates particular strengths in its academic offerings, with **Professors** receiving a high rating of 4.27. **Facilities** are also well-regarded at 4.09. Areas for improvement are evident in **Accomodation**, which scored lowest at 3.33. Other aspects like Location, Student Life, Internationality, and Value are rated moderately.
Across several key areas, the institution receives commendable ratings. Its strongest performances are noted in Value and Internationality, both achieving near-perfect scores. Professors also garnered exceptionally high marks. The weakest area is Location, which, while still positive, is rated lower than other aspects. Student Life, Accomodation, and Facilities all fall within a strong middle range.
Overall, the university presents a solid profile, with student life and location emerging as its strongest areas, both receiving excellent scores. The professors also garnered high marks. However, accommodation and internationality are areas where improvements could be considered, as these received the lowest ratings within the surveyed categories. Value for money is rated well, indicating a good balance of cost and experience.
This institution received uniform zero ratings across all surveyed categories. Consequently, there are no standout strengths or weaknesses to highlight. The assessment indicates a consistent lack of positive attributes in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. This uniform score suggests a critical need for improvement across the board.
With a strong emphasis on location and internationality, this university also scores very well for its professors and student life. Value for money is also a positive aspect. The weakest areas, while still respectable, are its facilities and accommodation.
This institution garners excellent feedback, particularly excelling in **Facilities** and **Student Life**, both receiving perfect scores. **Internationality** also stands out with a top rating. Conversely, **Location** is the weakest point, scoring a moderate three. Other aspects like Professors, Accommodation, and Value are rated positively at a solid four.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable and engaging lecturers, a diverse community, and well-structured assignments. A small portion of feedback (~9.1%) mentions a lack of organization and insufficient internship support.
With an average rating of 4.21/5, approximately 86% of reviews are positive, praising the collaborative atmosphere, quality programs, and accessible location. One review (around 7%) cites issues with indifferent administration.
University students largely praise the insightful sports management content, quality professors, and valuable networking opportunities, with a ~96% positive sentiment. A small fraction of feedback (~4%) mentions issues with academic support variability or program depth.
With 4.22 stars, ~98% of reviews are positive, praising beautiful campuses, helpful teachers, and social opportunities. A small amount of negative feedback mentioned some teachers' disinterest.
With one review, the university receives a perfect 5/5 rating. The sole reviewer highlighted exceptional teacher support and a balance of creativity and practicality in instruction. No negative feedback was received.
With a 4.54/5 average rating, nearly all students praise Schiller for its culturally rich environment and global opportunities. A small portion of feedback (~7.7%) suggests the university may be better suited for those seeking a less demanding academic path.
With a single review, the university receives a 4/5 average rating. Approximately 100% of feedback is positive, highlighting good teacher-student relationships and real-world focused teaching.
The overall experience was ok. Yet I dont feel that it was worth 10k€ a year for what I received. Starting from repetitive classes in each year but with a different name until not having bathrooms for almost 6 months. The quality of the majority of classes was 2/5. The content of the classes was not deep enough to teach you about tools, appliances, ways of solving, what should be taken into consideration. On my 2 last years. I took the exact same class of public relations but named differently. Not even the professor knew what to say any more. I didn’t saw not event one tool that is used in public relations. We analyzed just one case of public relations in the whole semester. And it was a mention not event a full analysis. I do not recommend GBSB. The internships they say the help you with on their webpage its a lie. They do not help you in any way to connect you with no company. They are not event informed in how to help you with the visa.
Classes are good, I would try to make them more interactive and with more practices in class. Professors normally are good, in the english course I believe the english of the teachers could be better specially if the course is taught in that language. I also believe professors could interact more with their students and try to get in contact with students they see may be struggling. Otherwise the campus, although a bit small is fine, really nice, the library could be a little bigger.
A perfect synergy between theoretical knowledge, practical application, and high-quality networking. After completing the Master in Sport Management at Johan Cruyff Institute, I took a major step forward in my career in the sports industry. What truly sets this institution apart is the closeness and support of the professors and staff, as well as the enriching experiences shared with fellow students. Without a doubt, it has been one of the most transformative decisions of my life.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
Nothing to show
