Lesya Ukrainka East European National University vs Yerevan Brusov State University of Languages and Social Sciences - YSLU vs Lutsk Polytechnic National University - NTU vs Kyungpook National University - KNU vs MIM Kyiv Business School - MIM
Side-by-side comparison from 19 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Highly skilled and professional faculty.
- +Abundant opportunities for research and language practice.
- +Engaging extracurricular activities and events.
- +High quality language education
- +Emphasis on practical application and speaking skills
Nothing to show
- +Welcoming, family-like community and supportive atmosphere.
- +High-quality students and professors.
- +Beautiful campus and valuable exchange programs.
- +Comprehensive business understanding and accessible teaching
- +Experiential learning, mentorship, and community events
- +Real-world application and career preparation
- +Experienced professors and practical, job-ready training
- +Professors' willingness to teach and hands-on clinic experience
- +Preparation for the job market post-graduation
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and lack of support.
- -Outdated and inadequate facilities, with complaints about cleanliness and functionality.
- -Overpriced tuition relative to the quality of education and resources provided.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -A lack of effective communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Communication with instructors and the institution is often lacking.
- -Poor administrative support and unclear communication are frequent complaints.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are significant drawbacks.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or lacking practical application.
- -Administrative and management issues are a constant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a significant drawback.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
Nothing to show
This institution excels in accommodations and value, both receiving perfect scores. Its facilities, professors, student life, and internationality are also highly regarded, each earning a 4-star rating. The university's weakest area, however, is its location, which received a score of 0, indicating a significant drawback in this aspect.
This institution receives its highest marks for **Location**, scoring a perfect 5. Conversely, **Accommodations** present a significant challenge, with a rating of just 1.5. Other areas like Professors and Student Life received solid scores, while Facilities, Internationality, and Value fall in the mid-range.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its **Value** (4.5) and **Professors** (4), alongside a solid showing in **Internationality** (3.5) and **Student Life** (3.33). Conversely, areas that appear weaker include **Location** (2.67) and **Accomodation** (2.67), with **Facilities** (3) also receiving a moderate rating. Overall, the university scores well in academic and financial aspects, while its physical environment and setting present more significant challenges.
This institution receives high marks across most categories, with Facilities standing out as its strongest area at a perfect 5. Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value are also exceptionally strong, each scoring 4.67. Professors represent the weakest area, though still solid at 4.33, with Location also performing well at 4.5.
This institution excels in internationality and value, both receiving top marks. Facilities, location, and accommodation are rated moderately well. However, student life presents a significant area for improvement, indicated by its lowest score. Professor quality is also a strong point, but not as exceptional as internationalization and value.
Nothing to show
All 5 reviews are positive, averaging 4/5 stars. Students praise skilled teachers and research opportunities, especially within the English and French Philology department. Minor points include improving heating and reducing photocopy costs.
With an average rating of 3.5/5, approximately 50% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent learning experiences and a potential for leading the field. No negative reviews were recorded, suggesting minimal negative feedback.
Nothing to show
With ~100% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.67/5, students praise the university's welcoming atmosphere and academic quality. Recurring themes include a strong sense of community, good students and professors, and a beautiful campus.
Students highly praise the comprehensive curriculum and excellent teaching staff, finding instruction accessible and engaging. Experiential learning opportunities and supportive faculty are frequently highlighted. No negative feedback was provided.
Students highlight well-prepared professors and effective programs that prepare them for the job market. With a high average rating of 4/5 and no negative feedback, the sentiment is overwhelmingly positive.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Like every institution Brusov State University also has its good and bad sides. My experience in the university was really memorable thanks to some of the lecturers and staff members, as well as the friends I have made there. BSU offers different fields of study, such as linguistics, public relations, journalism, tourism, international relations, European studies, political science, but its main focus is the fields of foreign languages. Wherever profession you chose for your study be sure that you will also be learning many languages, as the university teaches 28 languages, such as English, Russian, Spanish, French, German, Italian, Chinese, Korean and more. Another positive thing about the BSU that it closely works with many international university and organizations. Hence students are given many opportunities to become exchange students in other European universities or take part in training courses. As for the things that need to be changes in the university is the approach of many lectures that are mostly focused on the theories and somehow manage to make their lectures boring. Another thing that I did not like is that the classrooms are not comfortable and the equipment (notebooks, computer, projectors, etc) are old and need to be changes.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show