Polytechnic of Torino - Polito vs University of Pavia - UNIPV vs Ca' Foscari University Of Venice vs Vita-Salute San Raffaele University - UniSR vs ITS-ICT Piemonte

Side-by-side comparison from 188 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Vita-Salute San Raffaele University - UniSR (4.90)
Polytechnic of Torino - Polito: wins 0/7 categories
University of Pavia - UNIPV: wins 0/7 categories
Ca' Foscari University Of Venice: wins 0/7 categories
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University - UniSR: wins 7/7 categories
ITS-ICT Piemonte: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Mechanical Engineering
Best programme: Social Sciences
Best programme: Economics and Business
Best programme: Fisioterapia
Category ratings
Facilities
4.13
3.92
3.77
4.71
Win
4.00
Location
4.37
4.23
4.34
4.43
Win
4.00
Professors
4.02
4.14
4.01
4.71
Win
3.00
Internationality
4.23
4.22
4.11
4.43
Win
4.00
Student life
3.89
4.06
3.87
4.57
Win
3.00
Value
4.30
4.14
4.12
4.86
Win
4.00
Accommodation
3.73
3.78
3.25
4.20
Win
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Friendly, reachable professors with high-quality materials and communication.
  • +Diverse student activities and opportunities for future connections.
  • +Student-friendly city, affordability, scholarships, and strong job prospects.
  • +Engaging and experienced faculty
  • +Diverse and supportive student community
  • +Well-structured and effective academic programs
  • +High quality professors and intellectually stimulating environment
  • +International focus and diverse opportunities
  • +Practical, hands-on learning and manageable workload
  • +Integrated academic, clinical, and research environment
  • +High-quality teaching and knowledgeable, available instructors
  • +Excellent preparation, rich internships, and modern facilities

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are major concerns.
  • -Inefficient administrative and management processes cause frustration.
  • -Lack of adequate resources and support hinders learning.
  • -Disorganized and unresponsive administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance detract from the learning environment.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors hinders academic progress.
  • -Administrative and organizational issues are a major complaint.
  • -Ineffective and disorganized course structure and content are a recurring problem.
  • -A lack of responsiveness from professors and university staff is frustrating.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and transparency leads to confusion.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution receives strong marks for its **Location** (4.36) and **Internationality** (4.26), with **Value** (4.30) also highly rated. **Facilities** (4.13) and **Professors** (4.02) are also well-regarded. The university's lowest scores are in **Accomodation** (3.74) and **Student Life** (3.89), indicating these are areas for potential improvement.

This university demonstrates a strong overall performance, with particular commendations for its Location, Internationality, and Professors, all scoring above 4.1. Student Life and Value also receive favorable ratings. The areas that received the lowest scores are Accomodation and Facilities, indicating room for improvement in these aspects.

The university shows a strong performance in its **Location**, receiving a high rating of 4.34. Other positive aspects include **Internationality** and **Value**, both exceeding 4.0. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.25. **Professors** and **Student Life** also received solid scores, indicating a generally well-rounded educational experience.

This institution receives outstanding marks, particularly for its **professors** and **value**, which are rated exceptionally high. The **facilities** and **student life** are also strong points. While **accommodation** and **location** are rated slightly lower, they remain positive. The university demonstrates good **internationality**, contributing to a well-rounded experience.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.26/5 from 47 reviews, ~93% of feedback is positive. Students praise friendly, reachable professors with good materials, and enjoyable university activities. No negative feedback was provided.

University of Pavia reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~81% of feedback rating it 4-5 stars. Students praise the exceptional learning environment, passionate instructors, and supportive, diverse community. No negative reviews were recorded.

~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting stimulating international environments, qualified faculty, and useful courses. A small percentage (~7%) mention issues with university organization, professor responsiveness, and course structure.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students frequently highlight the strong integration of campus, hospital, and research, along with high-quality teaching and valuable internship opportunities.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
40%
36%
45%
86%
0%
4★
46%
41%
32%
14%
0%
3★
15%
23%
16%
0%
100%
2★
0%
0%
4%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
2%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Campus Location

Polito has several campus across the city. Each of them is in a convinient location and close to the bus, trum and metro. Going to the campus is easy because of the location and the transportation system.

Nothing to show

A Proud Step Toward My Academic Dream in Venice

As a former student of the Master’s program in Environmental Sciences – Global Change and Sustainability, I can confidently say that my time at Ca’ Foscari University of Venice was one of the most meaningful and transformative experiences of my life. From the very beginning, the university maintained a high level of professionalism and clarity in its communication and academic processes. As an international student, I felt well-informed about enrolment procedures, visa requirements, and academic expectations. The guidance provided made what could have been an overwhelming transition feel structured and manageable. Academically, the program was both challenging and inspiring. The curriculum was well-designed, fully taught in English, and focused on global environmental issues with a strong sustainability perspective. The professors were knowledgeable, supportive, and encouraged critical thinking and research-based learning. The international classroom environment also allowed me to engage with students from diverse cultural and academic backgrounds, which greatly enriched my experience. Beyond academics, studying in Venice added a unique dimension to my journey. The university offered helpful support services, orientation programs, and assistance with accommodation, which made settling into a new country much easier. Looking back, my time at Ca’ Foscari not only strengthened my academic foundation but also helped me grow personally and professionally. I am truly grateful for the opportunity and would highly recommend this program to anyone passionate about environmental studies and global sustainability.

A place for opportunities!

I completed both my Bachelor’s (Triennale) and Master’s (Magistrale) degrees in Biotechnology. Being in a small class was really helpful. It made communication between students and professors much easier. Also, the program offers a one-year internship packed with opportunities! .

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close