Sapienza – Università di Roma vs Polytechnic of Torino - Polito vs University of Pavia - UNIPV vs Ca' Foscari University Of Venice vs International School for Advanced Studies SISSA

Side-by-side comparison from 275 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Vita-Salute San Raffaele University - UniSR (4.90)
Sapienza – Università di Roma: wins 0/7 categories
Polytechnic of Torino - Polito: wins 1/7 categories
University of Pavia - UNIPV: wins 0/7 categories
Ca' Foscari University Of Venice: wins 0/7 categories
International School for Advanced Studies SISSA: wins 0/7 categories
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University - UniSR: wins 6/7 categories
ITS-ICT Piemonte: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Architecture
Best programme: Mechanical Engineering
Best programme: Social Sciences
Best programme: Economics and Business
Best programme: Fisioterapia
Category ratings
Facilities
3.63
4.12
3.92
3.66
Not rated
4.57
Win
4.00
Location
4.17
4.37
Win
4.23
4.12
Not rated
4.29
4.00
Professors
4.03
3.99
4.14
4.13
Not rated
4.86
Win
3.00
Internationality
3.87
4.18
4.22
4.21
Not rated
4.43
Win
4.00
Student life
3.78
3.80
4.06
3.85
Not rated
4.43
Win
3.00
Value
4.04
4.29
4.14
4.16
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Accommodation
3.34
3.66
3.78
3.14
Not rated
4.17
Win
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Well-structured programs with relevant, real-world applications
  • +Knowledgeable and supportive professors fostering interactive learning
  • +International environment and ample opportunities for growth
  • +Student-friendly city with affordable living and job opportunities
  • +High-quality education with hands-on experience and in-demand graduates
  • +Numerous extracurricular activities and scholarship options
  • +Engaging and experienced faculty
  • +Diverse and supportive student community
  • +Well-structured and effective academic programs
  • +Interdisciplinary, multi-angle approach to complex global issues
  • +Real-world problem focus with scientific analysis tools
  • +Unique city integration and international cohort experience

Nothing to show

  • +Integrated academic, clinical, and research environment
  • +High-quality teaching and knowledgeable, available instructors
  • +Excellent preparation, rich internships, and modern facilities

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and organizational issues cause students to feel like a number.
  • -Outdated facilities and labs limit the quality of education and practical experience.
  • -Lack of preparation for the job market and unhelpful teaching staff are recurring concerns.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -The curriculum is often irrelevant and outdated.
  • -Disorganized and unresponsive administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance detract from the learning environment.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors hinders academic progress.
  • -Administrative and management issues disrupt university life.
  • -Poor course structure and insufficient depth in subject matter are disappointing.
  • -Lack of responsiveness from staff and inadequate problem resolution are recurring complaints.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and transparency leads to confusion.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Considering the provided ratings, this institution demonstrates particular strengths in **Location** and **Value**, both scoring above 4.0. Professors also receive a strong rating. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerges as the weakest area, scoring the lowest. Student life and internationality are rated moderately well, falling between the strongest and weakest aspects.

This institution scores exceptionally well in its location, earning a top rating of 4.37. Value for money also stands out at 4.29. Conversely, accommodation represents the weakest area, with a rating of 3.66. Student life, while solid, is also among the lower-scoring aspects at 3.80. Other areas like facilities, professors, and internationality fall within a strong mid-range.

This university demonstrates a strong overall performance, with particular commendations for its Location, Internationality, and Professors, all scoring above 4.1. Student Life and Value also receive favorable ratings. The areas that received the lowest scores are Accomodation and Facilities, indicating room for improvement in these aspects.

This university demonstrates particular strength in its internationality, receiving a rating of 4.21. Other highly-rated aspects include professors and location, both scoring above 4.12. Student life and value for money also perform well. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a rating of 3.14. Facilities are rated moderately at 3.66.

Nothing to show

This institution receives outstanding marks, particularly for its **professors** and **value**, which are rated exceptionally high. The **facilities** and **student life** are also strong points. While **accommodation** and **location** are rated slightly lower, they remain positive. The university demonstrates good **internationality**, contributing to a well-rounded experience.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting well-structured programs, knowledgeable professors, and international opportunities. Negative feedback, representing ~4.8%, mentions disorganization and unengaging teaching.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~84%), highlighting a good student experience, numerous activities, and future opportunities. Students also appreciate the university's location and perceived value, with no negative feedback recorded.

University of Pavia reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~81% of feedback rating it 4-5 stars. Students praise the exceptional learning environment, passionate instructors, and supportive, diverse community. No negative reviews were recorded.

~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting interdisciplinary approaches and real-world relevance. A small percentage of feedback (~16%) mentions issues with organization and professor responsiveness.

Nothing to show

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students frequently highlight the strong integration of campus, hospital, and research, along with high-quality teaching and valuable internship opportunities.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
28%
40%
36%
48%
0%
86%
0%
4★
48%
44%
41%
26%
0%
14%
0%
3★
20%
16%
23%
19%
0%
0%
100%
2★
5%
0%
0%
5%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
My University

I studied at the Sapienza University of Rome. I think it is one of the best Italian universities, among its strong points we have: prestigious professors and a super active student community. the negative point is that there are many students and sometimes they are difficult to follow everyone. Beyond this I recommend the university. I studied in the economics faculty and I must say that it is really well organised. there are numerous study rooms, laboratories and there is a canteen which allows students to eat good food for a few euros. Sapienza is today a point of reference in the Italian community for capable young graduates!

Campus Location

Polito has several campus across the city. Each of them is in a convinient location and close to the bus, trum and metro. Going to the campus is easy because of the location and the transportation system.

Nothing to show

A Proud Step Toward My Academic Dream in Venice

As a former student of the Master’s program in Environmental Sciences – Global Change and Sustainability, I can confidently say that my time at Ca’ Foscari University of Venice was one of the most meaningful and transformative experiences of my life. From the very beginning, the university maintained a high level of professionalism and clarity in its communication and academic processes. As an international student, I felt well-informed about enrolment procedures, visa requirements, and academic expectations. The guidance provided made what could have been an overwhelming transition feel structured and manageable. Academically, the program was both challenging and inspiring. The curriculum was well-designed, fully taught in English, and focused on global environmental issues with a strong sustainability perspective. The professors were knowledgeable, supportive, and encouraged critical thinking and research-based learning. The international classroom environment also allowed me to engage with students from diverse cultural and academic backgrounds, which greatly enriched my experience. Beyond academics, studying in Venice added a unique dimension to my journey. The university offered helpful support services, orientation programs, and assistance with accommodation, which made settling into a new country much easier. Looking back, my time at Ca’ Foscari not only strengthened my academic foundation but also helped me grow personally and professionally. I am truly grateful for the opportunity and would highly recommend this program to anyone passionate about environmental studies and global sustainability.

Nothing to show

A place for opportunities!

I completed both my Bachelor’s (Triennale) and Master’s (Magistrale) degrees in Biotechnology. Being in a small class was really helpful. It made communication between students and professors much easier. Also, the program offers a one-year internship packed with opportunities! .

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close