Dublin Institute of Technology - DIT vs National University of Ireland Maynooth - NUIM vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs Kemmy Business School - KBS vs UCD Michael Smurfit Graduate Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 46 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, applied learning with real-world focus.
- +Accessible faculty and strong student support.
- +Central location and active academic atmosphere.
- +Excellent teaching and supportive faculty
- +Diverse and inclusive campus with engaging student life and events
- +Comprehensive facilities including library and sports
- +Connecting theory to practice through real-world cases.
- +Diverse international environment and global opportunities.
- +Relevant industry-focused courses and knowledgeable faculty.
- +Expert faculty and supportive environment
- +Modern facilities and accommodation
- +International focus and diverse student body
- +High-quality teaching and supportive professors
- +Career development opportunities and industry preparation
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities are a significant issue.
- -Administrative and management inefficiencies cause frequent frustration.
- -Lack of clear communication and support creates confusion and dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a problem.
- -Course content and teaching methods are often perceived as unengaging or irrelevant.
- -Perceived as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
- -Administrative and management issues create frequent problems.
- -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Communication and transparency are lacking from leadership.
- -Administrative and management issues are a major source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources detract from the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from the institution is a recurring problem.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in student life and location, receiving the highest marks in these areas. Conversely, accommodation presents the lowest score. Professors and internationality are also positively rated, alongside a solid showing for value and facilities. Overall, the university offers a generally favorable experience, though areas for improvement, particularly in housing, are evident.
With a solid overall performance, the university excels particularly in its **Professors**, earning a high rating of 4.25. Student life and location also received positive marks. The areas with the lowest scores are **Accomodation** at 3.5 and **Facilities** at 3.6, suggesting these aspects could benefit from further development to match the university's other strengths.
This institution performs well across most aspects, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive high marks. Areas for potential improvement include **Location**, which scored the lowest, and Accomodation. Student life and the overall value proposition are rated solidly in the mid-to-high range.
Across all surveyed categories, this institution demonstrates a consistent and strong performance. Each aspect, from facilities and professors to student life and internationality, has earned a rating of 4. The university excels uniformly, with no single area standing out significantly above others, nor any area identified as a weakness. Its balanced approach suggests a well-rounded educational experience.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in several key areas. Internationality and value for money receive particularly high marks, suggesting a welcoming global environment and excellent return on investment. Professors also earn strong ratings. The weakest area identified is accommodation, which scores lower than other aspects, indicating potential room for improvement in student housing offerings. Other categories like facilities, location, and student life are rated positively.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With ~76% positive reviews and an average of 4.06/5, students highlight practical learning, helpful faculty, and strong community. No negative feedback was reported.
With an average rating of 4.06/5, ~74% of reviews are highly positive, praising contemporary amenities, lively campus environment, and exceptional teaching quality. A small amount of feedback notes location accessibility challenges.
Most reviews (approximately 71%) highlight a positive learning atmosphere, inspiring professors, and valuable international experiences. A small amount of feedback (around 14%) suggests mediocrity and a focus on profit. The average rating is 3.86/5.
With an average rating of 4/5, reviews praise the vibrant academic community, state-of-the-art amenities, and expert faculty. ~100% of feedback is positive, with no negative reviews recorded.
Four reviews all expressed positive experiences, with an average rating of 4.25/5. Recurring themes include a positive learning environment, helpful professors, and a strong emphasis on developing soft skills. There were no negative reviews.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I overall liked the quality of education which includes projects, assignments and levels of exams. Furthermore, teachers are really nice and always willing to help students. However, one thing I would recommend is that electives should be introduced in this course as that would really help in giving a proper direction to one's career. Secondly, internships should also be included in the module as are really helpful in getting a job.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show