University of Limerick - UL vs University of Galway vs National University of Ireland Maynooth - NUIM vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs Kemmy Business School - KBS
Side-by-side comparison from 168 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Emphasis on practical, real-world skills and career preparation.
- +Welcoming atmosphere and strong sense of community for all students.
- +Excellent lecturers and dedicated academic support.
- +Engaging and supportive faculty
- +Vibrant campus life and ample opportunities
- +Modern facilities and strong academic programs
- +Excellent teaching and supportive faculty
- +Diverse and inclusive campus with engaging student life and events
- +Comprehensive facilities including library and sports
- +Connecting theory to practice through real-world cases.
- +Diverse international environment and global opportunities.
- +Relevant industry-focused courses and knowledgeable faculty.
- +Expert faculty and supportive environment
- +Modern facilities and accommodation
- +International focus and diverse student body
- +High-quality teaching and supportive professors
- +Career development opportunities and industry preparation
Nothing to show
- -Poor faculty engagement and guidance on career prospects and research.
- -Lack of quality and value despite seemingly lower fees.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Lack of effective communication and support from staff is a problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a problem.
- -Course content and teaching methods are often perceived as unengaging or irrelevant.
- -Perceived as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
- -Administrative and management issues create frequent problems.
- -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Communication and transparency are lacking from leadership.
- -Administrative and management issues are a major source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources detract from the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from the institution is a recurring problem.
Nothing to show
Considerable strengths emerge in teaching quality and student experience, with Professors receiving a high rating of 4.3 and Student Life at 4.23. The university also scores well in Facilities (4.2) and Internationality (4.21). Location is positively regarded at 4.01. The weakest area identified is Accomodation, scoring 3.95, while Value is also a strong point at 4.34.
This institution performs exceptionally well in several key areas. Its professors are highly rated, reflecting a strong academic foundation. Location and value also receive favorable scores. While generally positive, student life and accommodation are the relatively weaker aspects compared to other surveyed categories.
With a solid overall performance, the university excels particularly in its **Professors**, earning a high rating of 4.25. Student life and location also received positive marks. The areas with the lowest scores are **Accomodation** at 3.5 and **Facilities** at 3.6, suggesting these aspects could benefit from further development to match the university's other strengths.
This institution performs well across most aspects, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive high marks. Areas for potential improvement include **Location**, which scored the lowest, and Accomodation. Student life and the overall value proposition are rated solidly in the mid-to-high range.
Across all surveyed categories, this institution demonstrates a consistent and strong performance. Each aspect, from facilities and professors to student life and internationality, has earned a rating of 4. The university excels uniformly, with no single area standing out significantly above others, nor any area identified as a weakness. Its balanced approach suggests a well-rounded educational experience.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in several key areas. Internationality and value for money receive particularly high marks, suggesting a welcoming global environment and excellent return on investment. Professors also earn strong ratings. The weakest area identified is accommodation, which scores lower than other aspects, indicating potential room for improvement in student housing offerings. Other categories like facilities, location, and student life are rated positively.
Nothing to show
With ~99% of 80 reviews being positive, students highlight a lively community, excellent facilities, and practical learning. A single negative review criticized career prospects and faculty awareness.
With a 4.1/5 average rating from 59 reviews, nearly all feedback highlights a supportive atmosphere, engaging teachers, and excellent facilities. Vibrant campus life and academic rigor are also frequently mentioned. No negative reviews were recorded.
With an average rating of 4.06/5, ~74% of reviews are highly positive, praising contemporary amenities, lively campus environment, and exceptional teaching quality. A small amount of feedback notes location accessibility challenges.
Most reviews (approximately 71%) highlight a positive learning atmosphere, inspiring professors, and valuable international experiences. A small amount of feedback (around 14%) suggests mediocrity and a focus on profit. The average rating is 3.86/5.
With an average rating of 4/5, reviews praise the vibrant academic community, state-of-the-art amenities, and expert faculty. ~100% of feedback is positive, with no negative reviews recorded.
Four reviews all expressed positive experiences, with an average rating of 4.25/5. Recurring themes include a positive learning environment, helpful professors, and a strong emphasis on developing soft skills. There were no negative reviews.
Nothing to show
I am currently studying a Masters in International Entrepreneurship Management this programme develops entrepreneurial creativity, awareness and specialist knowledge to help establish, manage and grow innovative new ventures across a variety of industry settings, incorporating a range of in-company projects to give ‘real world’ experience. Participants explore their own entrepreneurial potential and prepare an investor-ready business plan. I have always wanted to start my own business and this programme equipped me with the tools and skills to do this. Throughout the programme, we were able to work with real-life businesses and consult for them on a regular basis. For example in a module called international business consulting we worked for one of the biggest PPE distributors in the EU. We developed a market entry strategy for the company Irema and outlined how they could advance into the US market. Furthermore, for the final year project, we had to work with a small enterprise and establish a two-year commercialisation plan for them. This was really great fun and gave a practical experience that you wouldn’t be able to get in any other programme.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I overall liked the quality of education which includes projects, assignments and levels of exams. Furthermore, teachers are really nice and always willing to help students. However, one thing I would recommend is that electives should be introduced in this course as that would really help in giving a proper direction to one's career. Secondly, internships should also be included in the module as are really helpful in getting a job.
Nothing to show
