Drohobych State Pedagogical University of Ivan Franko - DSPU vs Universidad España de Durango - UNES vs The City College of New York- CCNY vs Goethe Business School vs MIM Kyiv Business School - MIM

Side-by-side comparison from 19 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Drohobych State Pedagogical University of Ivan Franko - DSPU: wins 0/5 categories
Universidad España de Durango - UNES: wins 0/5 categories
The City College of New York- CCNY: wins 0/5 categories
Goethe Business School: wins 0/5 categories
MIM Kyiv Business School - MIM: wins 2/5 categories
Air Force Institute of Technology - AFIT: wins 0/5 categories
Enigma Business School - EBS: wins 3/5 categories
Comparing
New York City, United States
3.50
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Art and Design
Frankfurt, Germany
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: MBA
Best programme: Aerospace Engineering
Best programme: Business
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
Not rated
5.00
3.80
5.00
Location
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
Not rated
4.50
Win
4.20
4.33
Professors
Not rated
Not rated
3.25
Not rated
4.33
4.20
5.00
Win
Internationality
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
Not rated
4.67
3.00
5.00
Win
Student life
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
4.67
3.60
4.67
Value
Not rated
Not rated
3.25
Not rated
4.67
4.20
5.00
Win
Accommodation
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
4.67
Win
3.00
4.33
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Competent and experienced pedagogical staff
  • +Positive student and peer relationships
  • +Good quality hostel accommodation
  • +Strong education with values and interesting projects
  • +Easy creation procedures
  • +Good school reputation
  • +Supportive faculty and engaging classes
  • +Beautiful campus and accessible financial aid
  • +Personalized academic support through programs like SEEK

Nothing to show

  • +Comprehensive business understanding and accessible teaching
  • +Experiential learning, mentorship, and community events
  • +Real-world application and career preparation
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Emphasis on academic rigor and knowledge
  • +Engaging and rewarding learning environment
  • +Flexible online learning for professionals
  • +Comprehensive and applicable curriculum
  • +Seamless balance of career and study
Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a consistent complaint.
  • -Inconsistent and unresponsive administrative support causes significant frustration.
  • -Lack of engagement and clear communication from management is a recurring issue.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are often perceived as ineffective or unengaging.
  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Lacking and outdated facilities.
  • -Trainer knowledge not meeting expectations.

Nothing to show

  • -Poor administrative support and unclear communication are frequent complaints.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are significant drawbacks.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or lacking practical application.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Facilities are perceived as outdated and inadequate.
  • -Communication breakdowns and lack of support are recurring concerns.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
Rating summary
What students say

Performance across all surveyed categories remains at a standstill, with no discernible strengths or weaknesses emerging. Each aspect, from facilities and professors to student life and accommodation, registers a neutral rating of zero. This consistent score across the board indicates an area with significant room for development and improvement in all examined facets.

Across all surveyed categories, the university received a uniform score of zero. This indicates no specific strengths or weaknesses were identified in its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, or overall value. The consistent rating suggests a need for comprehensive review and potential improvement in all aspects of the university's offerings.

This institution demonstrates particular strengths in student life, earning a high rating in this area. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest score among the surveyed categories. Other aspects like facilities, location, and internationality are rated moderately well, while professor quality and value are also mid-range.

Nothing to show

This institution receives high marks across most categories, with Facilities standing out as its strongest area at a perfect 5. Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value are also exceptionally strong, each scoring 4.67. Professors represent the weakest area, though still solid at 4.33, with Location also performing well at 4.5.

This institution receives particularly high marks for its **professors**, **location**, and **value**, all scoring a strong 4.2. Conversely, **accommodation** and **internationality** present areas for potential improvement, each receiving a rating of 3. Facilities and student life are rated moderately. Overall, the university demonstrates a solid academic and locational offering.

Exceptional performance marks this university's ratings, with perfect scores in Facilities, Professors, and Internationality, alongside a high 5 for Value. Student Life also received a commendable 4.67. The areas with the lowest scores, though still strong, were Location and Accommodation, both rated at 4.33.

Reviews summary
Highlights

All reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students praise competent professors and engaging lectures, though some mention outdated programs. Hostel conditions are generally positive, but one review noted inadequate furnishings.

With a single review, this university receives a perfect 5/5 rating, indicating overwhelmingly positive sentiment. The student highlighted strong program quality and an easy creation procedure.

Half of reviews are negative, citing lacking facilities and poor administration. Positive feedback highlights attentive professors, engaging classes, and financial aid.

Nothing to show

Students highly praise the comprehensive curriculum and excellent teaching staff, finding instruction accessible and engaging. Experiential learning opportunities and supportive faculty are frequently highlighted. No negative feedback was provided.

Four out of five reviews are positive, praising supportive lecturers and good teaching quality. One review highlights a lack of practical areas and extracurricular activities.

All 3 reviews are highly positive, averaging 5/5 stars. Students praise the intuitive, flexible digital infrastructure and seamless integration of studies with professional lives. The curriculum is described as comprehensive and applicable.

Rating distribution
5★
100%
100%
50%
0%
67%
40%
100%
4★
0%
0%
0%
0%
33%
40%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
20%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Good school program!

The program school is good but UNES. In fact, I recommend UNES, education with values and interesting final projects, the creation procedure in UNES is so good and easier that others universities. For to be better UNES needs teachers with more experience in work.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close