EU Business School vs RWTH Aachen University vs Kühne Logistics University - KLU vs Aachen University of Applied Sciences - FH Aachen vs Schiller International University
Side-by-side comparison from 325 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Experienced, practical professors and real-world business insights
- +Diverse, international student community and networking opportunities
- +Innovative, engaging, and practical learning focused on business success
- +Strong industry reputation and career prospects.
- +Wide range of interesting courses and extracurricular activities.
- +High quality of materials and teaching, despite occasional need for personal investment.
- +Supportive people and approachable professors
- +Practical, real-world learning experiences
- +Strong networking and international community
- +High academic standards and quality education
- +Engaging projects and accessible professors
- +Modern facilities and convenient resources
- +Culturally diverse environment and international campus access
- +Supportive and organized academic environment with helpful instructors
- +Opportunities for career advancement and independent learning
- +Robust, technically-oriented curriculum
- +Strong industry connections and networking
- +Modern facilities and international exposure
- +Strong technology, entrepreneurship, and innovation focus
- +Small classes and personal lecturer/staff experience
- +Excellent value for money and career/life start opportunities
- -Administrative and management issues cause disorganization and lack of support.
- -Outdated facilities and basic education are offered, with little importance placed on quality learning.
- -The university operates as a business, with questionable accreditation and limited career prospects.
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor student support and disrespectful staff.
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of pedagogical skills from instructors.
- -Students feel disrespected and segregated by university hierarchy.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently criticized.
- -Administrative issues, including poor communication and disorganized processes, are a major source of frustration.
- -Lack of practical application and relevance in the curriculum disappoints students.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a major drawback.
- -Course content is perceived as irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
- -Lack of extracurriculars and limited opportunities for lower-year students.
- -Poor campus environment and a perceived low academic standard.
- -Administrative and management issues, including neglect and indifference, slow and inaccurate handling of student matters, and inaccessible alumni networks.
- -The university prioritizes tuition fees over student welfare and opportunities.
- -Concerns about unfair and potentially discriminatory contract practices.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a consistent problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and course organization leads to confusion.
This university excels in internationality and location, boasting the highest ratings in these areas. Student life and facilities also received very positive scores. Conversely, accommodation emerged as the weakest point, with a notably lower rating compared to other aspects. The value for money and professor quality are rated moderately well.
Considering student feedback, this institution excels in **Internationality** (4.0) and **Value** (3.99), suggesting a globally connected and cost-effective environment. **Location** also received a high score (3.97). Conversely, **Accomodation** presented the lowest rating at 3.08, indicating room for improvement in this area. **Professors** and **Student Life** scored moderately, around 3.53 and 3.59 respectively.
Examining the provided ratings reveals a university excelling in several key aspects. Its location stands out with an impressive score of 4.89, closely followed by strong performance in internationality (4.8), facilities (4.6), student life (4.6), and professors (4.65). However, accommodation presents a clear area for improvement, scoring significantly lower at 3.25, while value remains solid at 4.55.
The university excels in several key areas, with Facilities, Location, and Value all receiving strong scores of 4.4. Professors and Internationality are also well-regarded, both at 4.2. Accommodations are rated a solid 4. However, Student Life appears to be the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating of 2.7, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the university experience.
With a strong emphasis on location and internationality, this university also scores very well for its professors and student life. Value for money is also a positive aspect. The weakest areas, while still respectable, are its facilities and accommodation.
This institution demonstrates a solid performance across its surveyed aspects. Its strongest ratings are observed in Facilities, Accommodation, and Internationality, all scoring an impressive 3.83. Conversely, Professors, Location, Student Life, and Value are slightly lower, averaging 3.67. This suggests the university excels in its physical resources and global appeal, while areas like academic instruction and campus experience represent opportunities for enhancement.
This institution excels in several key areas, earning perfect scores for Professors and Accomodation, and near-perfect ratings for Facilities and Student Life. Its strongest aspects clearly lie in the academic and living experiences offered. Conversely, the university's Internationality and Value for money received the lowest scores among the surveyed categories, indicating areas where there is room for improvement.
Around ~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting knowledgeable professors, international environments, and practical, engaging courses. A small ~7.8% of reviews are negative, citing disorganization and basic education.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting interesting courses and career prospects. A smaller proportion (~14.6%) expresses concerns about hierarchical structures and teaching quality.
With an average rating of 4.76/5, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students highlight supportive professors, a personal learning environment with small classes, and practical, real-world experiences. No negative feedback was recorded.
With an average rating of 4.4/5, all five reviews are positive. Students highlight impressive academic standards, dedicated faculty, modern facilities, and engaging projects. Some note that while events are frequent, their organization and content could be improved.
With a 4.54/5 average rating, nearly all students praise Schiller for its culturally rich environment and global opportunities. A small portion of feedback (~7.7%) suggests the university may be better suited for those seeking a less demanding academic path.
Approximately 83% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong curricula, industry connections, and modern facilities. A small portion of feedback (around 17%) expresses concerns regarding student support and administrative responsiveness.
All five reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight a strong focus on technology and entrepreneurship, small class sizes, and a positive learning experience. No negative feedback was provided.
Although I earned my bachelor degree at the University of York in UK, it was quite theoretical. I really started to bridge the learning gap between theory and practice only when I started to pursue my master degree in Business Analytics and Data Science at EU Business School in Barcelona. What stands out most in my current program is the university’s strong emphasis on practical experience. Our professors are not only scholars but also are successful business managers and data experts, as they are either the owners of successful organizations or individuals who took on top management roles in large corporations. Their teachings are more than just the syllabus in, they also provide personal experience in the area of niche markets, provide best practices in an industry, and always provoke our thinking with regard to the existing trends in higher education, business strategy, and innovation.
I’m studying B.Sc. Electrical Engineering and Information Technology at RWTH Aachen. I’m currently in my 3rd semester. Although i find our subjects pretty hard to pass, i believe that this is the sign of quality education. I have troubles with some topics but our lecturers are always open to help and they also arrange online meetings to discuss our difficulties. What i also like is that you will have to choose a specific branch of your study after 2nd year, so that you’ll be more focused on your future area of expertise
My experience at KLU has truly been life-changing. This university has given me a second chance and opened the door to a completely new life filled with opportunities. From the very beginning, it has felt like a second home. What makes KLU so special is the people. Every single person here is supportive and genuinely willing to help. The professors are not only highly qualified and professional, but also approachable and always ready to guide you in any academic or professional matter. I have never been in a place like this before. The strong connection with industry, the quality of events, and the incredible network of classmates and alumni create the perfect environment for both personal and professional growth. I will always be grateful to KLU for everything I have experienced here.
Nothing to show
Schiller university is the best thing that can ever happen to anyone l will never regret the day l applied and l mostly love their campus in Germany it has nice aesthetics and obviously l love their culture
Nothing to show
Excellent small school with a strong focus on technology and entrepreneurship; small classes; personal experience with lecturers and staff; well-designed curriculum; good lectures and interesting guest lecturers; a lot of traveling if you don't live in Hamburg's south, but manageable for three semesters; excellent value for money compared to UK/US schools, even without receiving one of the many scholarships; financial breakeven in less than two years; well-known in northern Germany, but now more so in central Europe; each class has one or two larger successful startups, with founders frequently giving lectures on campus; the alumni network feels more like a family than a pure "business network"; the new CEO is driving growth; and there are plenty of opportunities and support provided for extracurricular activities, initiatives, etc.
