EU Business School vs Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich - LMU vs Technical University of Munich - TUM vs Globe Business College Munich vs New European College
Side-by-side comparison from 419 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Helpful professors and career support
- +Valuable practical and theoretical business knowledge
- +Enriching overall student experience
- +High-quality teaching and practical experience
- +Strong academic reputation and international environment
- +Well-organized programs with personalization options
- +Flexible and diverse program options
- +High academic standards and career prospects
- +Supportive professors and student community
Nothing to show
- +Supportive, family-like community and approachable, helpful lecturers
- +Personalized attention and mentorship throughout the academic journey
- +Beyond academics, including city orientation and flexible admissions
- +Practice-oriented courses and strong industry collaboration
- +Supportive and motivating instructors
- +Small class sizes and personalized attention
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause disorganization and lack of support.
- -Outdated facilities and a focus on attendance over quality education are criticized.
- -The educational program is perceived as basic and unaccredited in some regions.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently mentioned.
- -Course content is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
- -Administrative and management issues hinder academic progress and student well-being.
- -Ineffective and unhelpful legal representation exacerbates problems.
Nothing to show
- -Unresponsive or ineffective administrative and management support.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Inconsistent and unclear communication regarding academic and administrative matters.
- -Ineffective and outdated course content and teaching methods are a major concern.
- -Poorly managed administrative processes and lack of support are frequently criticized.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder the learning experience.
Nothing to show
This institution excels in several key areas, with Location and Internationality receiving the highest marks at 4.73. Student Life also scores well at 4.22. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring 3.42, suggesting room for improvement. Facilities and Professors are rated consistently around 4.04, while Value sits at a respectable 3.87.
This institution garners strong marks across the board. Its **facilities** stand out with the highest rating at 4.27. The **value** proposition is also highly regarded, scoring 4.25. Areas like **professors**, **location**, and **student life** are all rated around 4.19-4.20, indicating solid performance. **Accommodation** is the relatively weakest area, though still positive at 4.04. **Internationality** also scores well at 4.15.
This university garners excellent marks, particularly in **Internationality** (4.29) and **Facilities** (4.22). **Value** (4.20) and **Location** (4.19) also receive high scores. While **Student Life** (3.93) and **Accomodation** (3.75) are the lowest-rated aspects, they remain reasonably positive, suggesting a generally well-regarded institution.
Nothing to show
Overall, this university receives very positive ratings from students. The strongest areas of performance are Internationality, with a near-perfect score, closely followed by Professors and Location. Accomodation and Facilities represent the weakest, though still generally favorable, aspects of the student experience. The university also scores well in Student Life and Value.
This university receives particularly strong ratings in its **facilities**, achieving an impressive 4.67. Other well-regarded aspects include **professors**, **location**, **student life**, **internationality**, and **value**, all scoring a solid 4.33. The lowest-rated area is **accommodation**, with a score of 3.67, indicating room for improvement in this specific category.
Nothing to show
Around 74% of reviews are positive, praising professors, career services, and valuable skills gained. The remaining ~7.6% of feedback expresses concerns about disorganization and the quality of education.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~98%), with an average rating of 4.08/5. Students praise the high quality of teaching, practical project opportunities, and enriching international environment. Negative feedback is negligible.
Nearly all reviews are positive, highlighting flexible academic systems, diverse specializations, and good career prospects (~98%). A small amount of negative feedback mentions scheduling conflicts and administrative issues.
Nothing to show
Students praise NEC for its personal attention from approachable lecturers and a supportive, family-like community. The college exceeded expectations, offering a valuable experience beyond academics.
With a 4.33/5 average rating, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students highlight high-quality, practice-oriented courses, strong industry collaboration, and dedicated instructors. Some note large student numbers and limited staff as minor drawbacks.
Nothing to show
As far as universities go I think EU business school comes first in terms of student-staff relationship. Every member of the staff I have encountered has been more than helpful. What i think should improve as even tho its not connected to my previous point is I think the school should have more leniency towards tuition payment specially to international students because we are here despite the challenges of having to find willing banks to exchange local currencies to Euros.
There are superior facilities at the FH Aachen. The tutorial halls and classes are sophisticated, equipped with the the current and innovative equipment, and the library is large and well-stocked. To guarantee that students have a positive college experience, the educational facility also offers a range of extracurricular activities and events.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Initially, NEC was not my first choice of university, but one of the top three when choosing a master programme. This was due to a specific programme I was searching for not being offered. As my enquiry progressed, this university quickly became my first choice. The staff was very responsive and fast, made up of some of the kindest people I have met. They were able to guide me through the process and answer all the questions I had. Further, the chancellor has been very hands on from the beginning of the journey, with an open inbox and an open door. He is able to help his students not only in relation to the university but any guidance which is needed for students in a new city or country. The professors chosen have been a part of NEC for many years and bring a wide variety of industry knowledge. Their unique master programme has been exciting, interesting and relevant to the current day scenarios. It has been the right amount of challenging but all worth it. The environment is one of the most welcoming and supportive that I have ever experienced, and I would recommend New European College to anyone who is passionate about their future and education.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
