National Research University Higher School of Economics - HSE vs Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University - SPbPU vs Ulyanovsk State Pedagogical University - ULSPU vs Ulyanovsk State University - UlSU vs Moscow International Higher Business School - MIRBIS

Side-by-side comparison from 113 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Ulyanovsk State University - UlSU (5.00)
National Research University Higher School of Economics - HSE: wins 1/7 categories
Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University - SPbPU: wins 1/7 categories
Ulyanovsk State Pedagogical University - ULSPU: wins 0/7 categories
Ulyanovsk State University - UlSU: wins 0/7 categories
Moscow International Higher Business School - MIRBIS: wins 0/7 categories
Eurasian Management and Administration School: wins 5/7 categories
Elbrus Coding Bootcamp: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics and Finance
Best programme: Electrical Engineering
Best programme: Executive MBA
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.14
4.14
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.30
Win
Not rated
Location
4.67
Win
4.64
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.34
Not rated
Professors
4.33
4.18
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.78
Win
Not rated
Internationality
4.18
4.39
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.82
Win
Not rated
Student life
4.10
4.85
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.29
Not rated
Value
4.48
4.33
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.88
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
3.99
3.66
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.23
Win
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High academic quality & skilled faculty
  • +Global outlook & diverse programs
  • +Career opportunities & strong network
  • +Advanced labs and modern equipment
  • +Highly qualified and involved teaching staff
  • +Diverse academic and extracurricular development opportunities
  • +High-quality education and knowledgeable professors
  • +Strong student support and career assistance
  • +Active campus life and creative opportunities
  • +Diverse academic programs and faculties
  • +Extensive facilities and resources
  • +Strong international connections and collaborations

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, results-driven business education
  • +Actionable assignments and real-world application
  • +Experienced professors and industry insights

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues hinder student support.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and subjective academic processes are problematic.
  • -Unrealistic exam difficulty and demanding workloads cause frustration.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Ineffective teaching methods and curriculum design are problematic.
  • -Administrative & management issues
  • -Outdated facilities & equipment
  • -Inconsistent and uninspiring teaching quality
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a significant concern.
  • -Inconsistent or poor quality teaching across departments frustrates students.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause unnecessary stress and inefficiency.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are prevalent.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates a particularly strong showing in its **Location**, receiving the highest rating. Value and Professors are also highly regarded. Conversely, the **Accomodation** received the lowest score among the evaluated aspects. The university also scores well in Internationality, Facilities, and Student Life, indicating a generally positive overall perception with a few areas for potential improvement.

Overall, this university garners strong scores across most categories. Student life stands out as a particular strength, boasting the highest rating. Location also scores very well. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest marks, indicating an area for potential improvement. The university demonstrates a solid reputation for its professors, facilities, internationality, and value.

A consistent rating of zero across all surveyed categories presents a peculiar academic profile. Consequently, there are no standout strengths or identifiable weaknesses to highlight. The university performs uniformly poorly in every aspect, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value, according to the provided metrics.

Presenting a concerning picture, this university received zero ratings in all surveyed categories: Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value. Consequently, there are no apparent strengths or weaknesses to highlight, as the institution scored identically across every aspect of its operation.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in **Value** and **Internationality**, both scoring very high. **Professors** also receive a strong rating, indicating high academic quality. **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Accomodation** are all rated solidly, suggesting a good overall student experience. The lowest-rated area, though still positive, is **Location**.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Around 96% of reviews are positive, highlighting high-quality education, excellent faculty, and valuable connections. A small portion of feedback mentions issues with some professors and the grading system.

~92% of reviews are positive, praising skill development, modern labs, and qualified, involved teaching staff. Students also highlight extracurricular activities and university prestige. No negative feedback was recorded.

All four reviews are positive, giving an average of 4.5/5 stars. Students praise the quality of education and professors, while also mentioning good employment support and developed public activities.

With a single review, this university receives a perfect 5/5 rating, indicating overwhelmingly positive sentiment. The feedback highlights strong academic programs across many faculties and extensive facilities.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.82/5 from 49 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highly praise the school's practical, results-driven business education and real-world application. Modules and assignments are frequently highlighted for their immediate applicability.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
65%
44%
50%
100%
0%
82%
0%
4★
22%
44%
50%
0%
0%
18%
0%
3★
9%
11%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Polytechnic

'-': some equipment and manuals, that we study, are outdated. All buildings, except the main one, need to be repaired. Some teachers are incompetent in their subjects. ' ': Opportunities. A lot of opportunities. Large number of events are held at the university and if you will participate in them, you will develop yourself very much.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

A Premier Choice for Ambitious Business Leaders

If you’re looking for a practical, results-driven business education that makes a real impact, the Eurasian Management & Administration School (EMAS) is an excellent choice. EMAS stands out as one of the strongest business schools in Central and Eastern Europe, offering MBA, Executive MBA, DBA, and business coaching programs that focus on real-world implementation and strategic thinking. DBA at EMAS transformed my leadership and boosted my Business vision, it’s a Strategic DBA, that gives real business impact. The DBA sharpened my executive edge. In all it’s a Practical DBA, great support, real impact.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close