ESCP Business School vs SGH Warsaw School of Economics - SGH vs WSB University - WSB vs Lazarski University vs Collegium Humanum Warsaw Management University

Side-by-side comparison from 202 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Collegium Humanum Warsaw Management University (5.00)
ESCP Business School: wins 1/7 categories
SGH Warsaw School of Economics - SGH: wins 0/7 categories
WSB University - WSB: wins 0/7 categories
Lazarski University: wins 1/7 categories
Collegium Humanum Warsaw Management University: wins 5/7 categories
Zabielski Foundation: wins 0/7 categories
Warsaw University of Business - WWSB: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Bachelor in Management
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Business Administration + Marketing
Warsaw, Poland
4.50
Read more reviews
112 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Management
Best programme: Law
Warsaw, Poland
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: IT Management
Category ratings
Facilities
4.09
4.07
4.00
4.61
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
Location
4.33
4.67
4.56
4.56
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.30
Professors
4.11
4.30
4.11
4.57
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.10
Internationality
4.80
Win
4.04
4.44
4.63
4.50
Not rated
4.10
Student life
4.17
4.11
3.63
4.46
4.50
Win
Not rated
3.80
Value
4.39
4.15
4.11
4.62
Win
4.50
Not rated
4.30
Accommodation
3.27
3.58
3.56
3.87
4.50
Win
Not rated
3.30
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +European campuses and multicultural environment
  • +Strong career preparation and top company recruitment
  • +Development of interpersonal and managerial skills
  • +Inspiring academic environment and knowledgeable, supportive faculty
  • +Strong focus on practical skills and real-world application
  • +Prestigious reputation and pathway to a successful career
  • +Practical focus and internship opportunities
  • +Flexible and hybrid learning formats
  • +Welcoming environment and competent staff
  • +Excellent teachers and practical, real-world learning
  • +Engaging and supportive learning environment
  • +Modern facilities and international community
  • +High education level and experienced professors
  • +Valuable new skills acquisition
  • +Worthwhile academic decision

Nothing to show

  • +International environment and practical learning
  • +Supportive faculty and experienced lecturers
  • +Personal growth and networking opportunities
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor campus infrastructure are a recurring problem.
  • -The curriculum often lacks practical application and relevance.
  • -Bureaucracy and administrative issues
  • -Lack of support and usability from online systems
  • -Overbearing control over student organizations
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are common complaints.
  • -Poor organization and unqualified instructors are a major concern.
  • -A lack of English proficiency among the student body hinders integration.
  • -Inadequate student support systems are a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a recurring complaint.
  • -Communication breakdowns and unclear expectations lead to student dissatisfaction.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative & management issues lead to poor responsiveness and disappearing support after tuition payment.
Rating summary
What students say

Across various aspects, this institution shows considerable strengths, particularly in **Internationality**, earning a near-perfect score. **Location** and **Value** also received very high marks. Student life and professors are rated positively, as are facilities. However, the lowest-rated category is **Accomodation**, indicating an area for potential improvement.

This university demonstrates a strong presence in key areas, with **Location** receiving the highest marks at 4.67. **Professors** and **Value** also perform well, scoring above 4.1. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area, rated at 3.58. Other categories like Facilities, Student Life, and Internationality all fall within a comparable, solid range, generally above 4.0.

This institution receives commendations for its facilities and professors, both scoring a solid 4. The location stands out as the strongest area with a rating of 4.56. Conversely, student life at 3.63 and accommodation at 3.56 represent the weakest aspects. Internationality is also highly rated at 4.44, and value for money is good at 4.11.

An excellent performance is evident across several key areas for this university. Its strongest areas are Internationality (4.63), Facilities (4.61), and Value (4.62), indicating a highly positive student experience in these aspects. Professors and Location also receive very strong scores. The weakest area appears to be Accomodation, with a rating of 3.87, suggesting room for improvement in this particular category.

This institution garners excellent marks across the board. Its strongest areas, with perfect scores, are its facilities, professors, and prime location. Student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value are also highly rated, all receiving a 4.5. Overall, it presents a very appealing profile with no significant weaknesses identified.

Nothing to show

The university demonstrates notable strengths in key areas. Location and value receive particularly high scores, suggesting excellent external factors and return on investment. Internationality and professors are also well-regarded. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest area, indicating room for improvement. Student life and facilities also score moderately, suggesting these aspects could benefit from enhancement.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 97.6% of reviews are positive, highlighting rewarding experiences, multicultural environments, and personal/professional growth. A single negative review mentioned the EMIB program should be updated.

Around 96% of reviews are positive, praising the inspiring community, academic rigor, and dedicated faculty. A small percentage of feedback (around 4%) mentions issues with bureaucracy and administrative processes.

With an average rating of 4/5, ~78% of reviews are positive. Students highlight practical learning, internships, and flexible/hybrid class formats. Minor feedback mentions varied lecturer English proficiency and sometimes confusing program structure.

With ~92% of 112 reviews being positive, students praise facilities, experienced teachers, and practical learning. A single negative review noted disorganization and an unsupportive student body.

Both reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students praised the high education level, great lectures, and experienced professors.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4/5, approximately 80% of reviews are highly positive, praising the international environment, supportive faculty, and practical learning. A small amount of negative feedback (~10%) mentions administrative responsiveness issues after payment.

Rating distribution
5★
55%
41%
22%
64%
100%
0%
40%
4★
38%
52%
56%
27%
0%
0%
40%
3★
5%
4%
22%
8%
0%
0%
10%
2★
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
2%
0%
0%
1%
0%
0%
10%
Most useful review
Most liked
Great international exposure

To me, studying at ESCP has been a really rewarding experience. The multicultural environment helped me grow both personally and professionally. Professors are very supportive and bring real-world insights into the classroom. I rlly liked the flexibility to study in different campuses across Europe. Although some admin processes can be slow, but overall I felt well-prepared for the job market.

Quality Education and campus life

Attending the Warsaw School of Economics has been an enriching journey. The academic standard is impressive, offering a variety of programs that balance solid theoretical knowledge with practical skills. Professors are highly qualified and foster engaging discussions that stimulate intellectual growth. The curriculum is current, reflecting global trends and addressing real-world issues. Accommodation options are diverse, with university dorms offering affordable yet basic living conditions, though they can be competitive to secure. Private rentals are also available, though they tend to be pricier, particularly close to the center of Warsaw. As a Polish student, the tuition fees are quite reasonable in comparison to other European institutions, making SGH an excellent investment in my education. Campus life is dynamic, with numerous student clubs, events, and opportunities to connect with others. The university cultivates a strong community spirit, and there’s always something going on whether academic, social, or cultural. All in all, SGH provides a well-rounded and fulfilling university experience.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

I am glad to study here

I would definitely recommend Collegium Humanum to other students. High education level, I was able to learn a lot of new skills, professors with huge experience in the professional sector - this is why I highly rate

Nothing to show

Review

Personally, I think wwsb is one of the best private universities in Poland. It’s not just a place to study but a place to gain personal growth, networking opportunities, and the chance to contribute to research and innovation. The staffs are very friendly, teaching method is very unique and students can grasp what they’re being taught within a short period of time. Although there are no on-campus accommodations, the university helps you search for off-campus accommodation/apartment which I think is very good. The school is also situated at a very good location which makes the studying atmosphere wonderful.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close