SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities vs University of Euroregional Economy - WSGE vs WSB University - WSB vs Lazarski University vs Collegium Humanum Warsaw Management University
Side-by-side comparison from 222 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Passionate and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Well-organized and relevant programs
- +Positive learning environment and resources
- +Affordable tuition and helpful staff
- +Supportive professors and direct student contact
- +Accessible location near Warsaw
- +Practical focus and internship opportunities
- +Flexible and hybrid learning formats
- +Welcoming environment and competent staff
- +Excellent teachers and practical, real-world learning
- +Engaging and supportive learning environment
- +Modern facilities and international community
- +High education level and experienced professors
- +Valuable new skills acquisition
- +Worthwhile academic decision
- +International environment and diverse student body
- +Supportive staff and dedicated professors
- +Small class sizes and engaging learning opportunities
- +Strong academic programs with updated knowledge and practical skills.
- +Experienced and dedicated faculty creating an engaging learning environment.
- +Focus on career development and job market readiness.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
- -Poor organization and communication among staff lead to problems.
- -Lack of adequate academic structure and support is evident.
- -Administrative and management issues disrupt student experience.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of support and unclear communication cause frustration.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support are common complaints.
- -Poor organization and unqualified instructors are a major concern.
- -A lack of English proficiency among the student body hinders integration.
- -Inadequate student support systems are a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a recurring complaint.
- -Communication breakdowns and unclear expectations lead to student dissatisfaction.
- -Lack of communication and disregard for student concerns on crucial issues.
- -Disappointing student experience and unfulfilled expectations.
- -Administrative and management issues, including registration errors and unexpected fees.
- -Poor quality of teaching and lack of engaging course content.
- -Insufficient student life facilities and inadequate communication.
This institution presents a strong academic profile, with exceptional ratings for its professors and facilities. Location and internationality also score well. Student life and accommodation represent areas with lower, though still respectable, scores compared to other aspects. The overall value for money is perceived positively, aligning with the location rating.
Overall, this university garners strong ratings, particularly excelling in its **Professors** and **Student Life**, both achieving a high score of 4.5. The **Facilities**, **Internationality**, and **Value** also stand out with solid marks of 4.25. While **Accomodation** receives a good rating of 4, the **Location** emerges as the weakest area, scoring significantly lower at 2.75.
This institution receives commendations for its facilities and professors, both scoring a solid 4. The location stands out as the strongest area with a rating of 4.56. Conversely, student life at 3.63 and accommodation at 3.56 represent the weakest aspects. Internationality is also highly rated at 4.44, and value for money is good at 4.11.
An excellent performance is evident across several key areas for this university. Its strongest areas are Internationality (4.63), Facilities (4.61), and Value (4.62), indicating a highly positive student experience in these aspects. Professors and Location also receive very strong scores. The weakest area appears to be Accomodation, with a rating of 3.87, suggesting room for improvement in this particular category.
This institution garners excellent marks across the board. Its strongest areas, with perfect scores, are its facilities, professors, and prime location. Student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value are also highly rated, all receiving a 4.5. Overall, it presents a very appealing profile with no significant weaknesses identified.
This university receives strong marks, particularly for its **location** (4.7) and **internationality** (4.3). Areas like **facilities** and **value** also score well at 4.0. The **student life** rating is solid at 3.9. The **accommodation** category presents the weakest performance with a 3.3 rating, suggesting room for improvement in student housing.
Overall, the university receives favorable ratings. Its strongest areas are Location and Internationality, both scoring above 4.2. Professors and Facilities also perform well with identical scores of 4.125. The university's weakest point is Accomodation, which received the lowest rating. Student Life and Value are mid-range performers.
Nearly all reviews are positive, praising passionate lecturers and well-organized programs. A small percentage of feedback mentions concerns about program structure and course coordination.
With an average rating of 4.17/5 from 6 reviews, about 83% of feedback is highly positive. Students praise affordable tuition, helpful staff, direct lecturer support, and the university's positive environment. No negative feedback was provided.
With an average rating of 4/5, ~78% of reviews are positive. Students highlight practical learning, internships, and flexible/hybrid class formats. Minor feedback mentions varied lecturer English proficiency and sometimes confusing program structure.
With ~92% of 112 reviews being positive, students praise facilities, experienced teachers, and practical learning. A single negative review noted disorganization and an unsupportive student body.
Both reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students praised the high education level, great lectures, and experienced professors.
University reviews are largely positive (approximately 93%), with students appreciating the international environment and supportive staff. A small portion (~7%) expressed dissatisfaction regarding a canceled graduation ceremony.
~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong programs, engaging faculty, and career preparation. A small minority (~5%) mention administrative issues and a lack of student life facilities.
Overall, i would rate programme at SWPS positively. What stands out the most is the practical approach to lerning. Many lectures have real professional expierience and often explain topics throhu examples from thier field, not only through theory or slides. The atmosphere is modern, open and quite relaxed, wich makes it easier to feel comfortable as a student. I also like that the university encourages independent thinking and discussion. However the organization could be better, especially considering the tuition fees. Some classes feel more useful and better prepared than others.
University is very good, coordination between students and professors is nice, work ethics is appreciable,subjects related to topic and clear whole concepts about subject and atmosphere of university is very nice.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I would definitely recommend Collegium Humanum to other students. High education level, I was able to learn a lot of new skills, professors with huge experience in the professional sector - this is why I highly rate
Nothing to show
The art studios are equipped with the necessary tools and materials for creative expression. The school auditorium hosts various cultural events and performances, providing a platform for students to showcase their talents.
