Norwegian University of Science and Technology - NTNU vs Universidad del Claustro de Sor Juana - UCSJ vs BI Norwegian Business School - BI vs Aalen University vs NHH Norwegian School of Economics
Side-by-side comparison from 30 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +strong academic programs & practical exposure
- +vibrant social life & student organizations
- +knowledgeable professors & engaging lectures
- +Strong humanities and arts foundation.
- +Excellent, specialized programs like gastronomy.
- +Focus on humanistic skills and free thinking.
- +Knowledgeable lecturers and strong academic environment
- +Practical approach and industry connections
- +Good location and food variety
- +Supportive and approachable professors
- +Emphasis on practical, hands-on learning
- +Vibrant international community and activities
- +Free tuition and diverse program options
- +High quality education and international exchange opportunities
- +Supportive environment and welcoming community
- +Insightful understanding of Norwegian welfare model
- +Exploration of universalism, public sector strength, and social solidarity
- +Balance of economic competitiveness and social protection
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are frustrating.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and unhelpful instructors are a major concern.
- -Administrative and management issues create unnecessary obstacles and stress.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of effective communication and clear guidance is prevalent.
- -Students dislike the lack of proper support and communication from staff.
- -They often complain about outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources.
- -Students express frustration with the curriculum and teaching methods being unengaging or irrelevant.
- -Administrative and management issues disrupt the learning environment.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder academic progress.
- -Lack of effective communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring concern.
- -Poor teaching quality and curriculum relevance are often criticized.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning and comfort.
- -The curriculum lacks depth and practical application.
Nothing to show
This institution garners strong approval, particularly in student life, its strongest area. Facilities and location also receive high marks. Conversely, internationality stands out as the weakest point among the evaluated aspects. Accommodation, professors, and overall value are rated positively, indicating a generally well-regarded university experience.
This institution receives strong commendations for its **professors** and **value**, both scoring a high 4.5. Facilities and location also received favorable ratings of 4. Student life is rated a respectable 3.5, while internationality stands at 2.5. The most significant area for improvement is **accommodation**, which received a low score of 1.
This institution demonstrates remarkable strengths, with exceptional ratings for its Facilities, Professors, and Location, all scoring an impressive 4.5. Student Life and Internationality also receive solid marks at 4. However, Accommodations and Value emerge as areas needing development, each receiving a lower score of 3.
Across various aspects, this university demonstrates a strong academic and campus environment. Professors and value for money stand out as the highest-rated areas. Facilities and accommodation also receive very positive scores. Student life and internationality are well-regarded, indicating a good overall experience. The lowest-scoring category, location, suggests room for improvement in this particular aspect.
This institution receives exceptionally high marks for its facilities and accommodation, both scoring an outstanding 4.7. Professors and internationality are also strong points, with ratings of 4.4. Student life and value for money are rated at 4.3 and 4.1 respectively. The university's location is its weakest area, though still a respectable 4.1.
Remarkably, this institution achieved a perfect score of 5 out of 5 in every evaluated category. The facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all considered outstanding. There are no apparent weak areas, as all aspects of the university have been rated at the highest possible level.
Nothing to show
With a 4.44/5 average from 9 reviews, ~89% are positive. Students highlight excellent education and social life, especially for engineering. No negative feedback was provided.
All reviews are positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight excellent programs and teachers in areas like Art History and Human Sciences, valuing the focus on humanistic skills and international recognition, particularly in gastronomy.
With an average rating of 4/5, student feedback is highly positive. Reviewers consistently praise the great location, knowledgeable lecturers, and strong academic environment. Industry connections and a practical approach to education were also highlighted.
With 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.63/5, students highlight supportive professors and practical learning through projects. This hands-on approach greatly enhances understanding and employability.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~0% negative feedback. Students praise the free tuition and wide range of masters specializations, highlighting a conducive academic and diverse environment.
Based on one review, the university received a perfect 5/5 rating. Positive feedback (~100%) highlights a comprehensive understanding of the Norwegian welfare model.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
