Norwegian University of Science and Technology - NTNU vs Waterford Institute of Technology - WIT vs The Bonn-Rhine-Sieg University of Applied Sciences vs BI Norwegian Business School - BI vs Cass Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 35 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +strong academic programs & practical exposure
- +vibrant social life & student organizations
- +knowledgeable professors & engaging lectures
- +Supportive and helpful tutors
- +Valuable educational and practical knowledge
- +Positive peer recommendations
- +Rigorous technical foundation and practical skills
- +Bridging theory and real-world application
- +Knowledgeable professors and advanced curriculum
- +Knowledgeable lecturers and strong academic environment
- +Practical approach and industry connections
- +Good location and food variety
- +Engaging professors and effective teaching methods
- +Diverse student body and valuable networking opportunities
- +Strong career services and diverse program specializations
- +Free tuition and diverse program options
- +High quality education and international exchange opportunities
- +Supportive environment and welcoming community
- +Insightful understanding of Norwegian welfare model
- +Exploration of universalism, public sector strength, and social solidarity
- +Balance of economic competitiveness and social protection
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are frustrating.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and unhelpful instructors are a major concern.
- -Administrative and management issues create unnecessary obstacles and stress.
- -Administrative and management issues, including timetable changes and unorganized lecturers.
- -Outdated facilities and poor infrastructure like unreliable WiFi and non-functional printers.
- -Lack of engagement with students not on the main campus and shifting academic requirements.
- -Inefficient administrative and management processes
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities
- -Lack of clear communication and support
- -Students dislike the lack of proper support and communication from staff.
- -They often complain about outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources.
- -Students express frustration with the curriculum and teaching methods being unengaging or irrelevant.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Communication and transparency are frequently lacking.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring concern.
- -Poor teaching quality and curriculum relevance are often criticized.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning and comfort.
- -The curriculum lacks depth and practical application.
This institution garners strong approval, particularly in student life, its strongest area. Facilities and location also receive high marks. Conversely, internationality stands out as the weakest point among the evaluated aspects. Accommodation, professors, and overall value are rated positively, indicating a generally well-regarded university experience.
This institution demonstrates a solid overall performance, with notable strengths in **Student Life** (3.75) and **Professors** (3.75). **Location** also receives a positive score (3.525). Conversely, areas requiring attention include **Internationality** (3.025) and **Facilities** (3.125), which received the lowest ratings among the surveyed categories. Accommodations and value are rated moderately.
This institution receives outstanding marks in Facilities and Professors, both achieving a perfect score of 5. Student Life, Location, and Accommodations are also strong, all rated at a solid 4. Its Internationality score is slightly lower at 3.5, representing the weakest area among the assessed categories. Overall, the university demonstrates a well-rounded and positive profile.
This institution demonstrates remarkable strengths, with exceptional ratings for its Facilities, Professors, and Location, all scoring an impressive 4.5. Student Life and Internationality also receive solid marks at 4. However, Accommodations and Value emerge as areas needing development, each receiving a lower score of 3.
This university garners excellent reviews across most aspects. Its strongest areas are clearly **Location** and **Value**, both scoring a high 4.44 and 4.5 respectively. Professors and student life also receive very positive marks. The weakest area identified is **Accomodation**, which, while still good, sits at a 4.0, slightly below the other categories. Internationality and Facilities are also well-regarded.
This institution receives exceptionally high marks for its facilities and accommodation, both scoring an outstanding 4.7. Professors and internationality are also strong points, with ratings of 4.4. Student life and value for money are rated at 4.3 and 4.1 respectively. The university's location is its weakest area, though still a respectable 4.1.
Remarkably, this institution achieved a perfect score of 5 out of 5 in every evaluated category. The facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all considered outstanding. There are no apparent weak areas, as all aspects of the university have been rated at the highest possible level.
With a 4.44/5 average from 9 reviews, ~89% are positive. Students highlight excellent education and social life, especially for engineering. No negative feedback was provided.
University reviews are generally positive (~75%), with students appreciating helpful tutors and relevant course content. A small portion (~25%) of feedback notes issues with timetable changes, disorganization, and poor facilities.
With an average rating of 4.5/5 from two reviews, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students praise rigorous technical foundations and practical, real-life application in their programs.
With an average rating of 4/5, student feedback is highly positive. Reviewers consistently praise the great location, knowledgeable lecturers, and strong academic environment. Industry connections and a practical approach to education were also highlighted.
With an average rating of 4.5/5 from 10 reviews, ~90% are positive, highlighting knowledgeable professors, engaging teaching, and valuable career opportunities. No negative feedback was reported.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~0% negative feedback. Students praise the free tuition and wide range of masters specializations, highlighting a conducive academic and diverse environment.
Based on one review, the university received a perfect 5/5 rating. Positive feedback (~100%) highlights a comprehensive understanding of the Norwegian welfare model.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
