Norwegian University of Science and Technology - NTNU vs University of Wuerzburg vs BI Norwegian Business School - BI vs Széchenyi István University - SZE vs NHH Norwegian School of Economics
Side-by-side comparison from 37 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong academic programs and knowledgeable professors.
- +Practical experience and career opportunities.
- +Vibrant student life and city atmosphere.
- +Supportive professors and close student-professor relationships
- +Culturally and linguistically focused programmes
- +Qualified and adaptive teaching staff
- +Strong industry connections and practical business education
- +International environment and balanced daily life
- +Excellent and varied food options
- +Supportive and approachable academic staff
- +Modern campus facilities and pleasant environment
- +Opportunities for practical learning and international interaction
- +Free tuition and diverse program options
- +High quality education and international exchange opportunities
- +Supportive environment and welcoming community
- +Insightful understanding of Norwegian welfare model
- +Exploration of universalism, public sector strength, and social solidarity
- +Balance of economic competitiveness and social protection
- +Engaging faculty and strong academic support
- +Diverse course offerings and practical learning opportunities
- +Well-equipped campus facilities and student amenities
- -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources significantly hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of clear guidance are prevalent.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common complaint.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or lacking in practical application.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of student support are common complaints.
- -Lack of social life and engaging events
- -Insufficient or poorly managed administrative support
- -Outdated or inadequate facilities
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring concern.
- -Poor teaching quality and curriculum relevance are often criticized.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning and comfort.
- -The curriculum lacks depth and practical application.
- -Poor administrative and management support
- -Outdated facilities and equipment
- -Lack of practical application and job readiness
This institution garners strong performance in student life, achieving the highest rating. Facilities, location, and value are also well-regarded. Professors and accommodation ratings are solid, while internationality is rated comparably. Overall, the university presents a positive profile with particular strengths in student engagement and practical aspects.
This institution shines with exceptional scores in **Professors** and **Student Life**, both receiving a perfect 5. Its **Facilities** also impress at 4.5. Conversely, **Location**, **Accomodation**, and **Internationality** are areas with moderate scores, all rated at 3.5. The university offers good **Value**, earning a solid 4.
Impressive scores characterize this institution, particularly in its **facilities**, **location**, and **internationality**, all receiving perfect marks. Student experience is further bolstered by a commendable **student life** and a strong **professor** evaluation. However, **accommodation** presents a notable weakness with a score of 2, and the **value** proposition sits in the middle with a rating of 3.
Among surveyed categories, student life and internationality stand out with strong ratings of 4.28 and 4.4 respectively. Accommodation also scores well at 4.36. The university's weakest area is value, with a rating of 3.87, while facilities receive a solid 4. Professors and location are also rated positively. Overall, the institution demonstrates a generally favorable standing across its evaluated aspects.
This institution receives exceptionally high marks for its facilities and accommodation, both scoring an outstanding 4.7. Professors and internationality are also strong points, with ratings of 4.4. Student life and value for money are rated at 4.3 and 4.1 respectively. The university's location is its weakest area, though still a respectable 4.1.
Remarkably, this institution achieved a perfect score of 5 out of 5 in every evaluated category. The facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all considered outstanding. There are no apparent weak areas, as all aspects of the university have been rated at the highest possible level.
This institution excels in several key areas, boasting top marks for Facilities, Location, and Student Life, all rated at 4.5. Accommodations and Internationality also receive strong scores. Areas with room for improvement include Professors and Value, both rated at 3.67.
The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~75% of reviews rating it 4-5 stars. Students praise its strong research technologies, engineering, and pragmatic programs. A vibrant student city atmosphere is also a recurring highlight.
With an average rating of 4/5, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Both reviews highlighted the excellent teaching staff, close professor-student relationships, and beneficial program content.
This university receives a strong average rating of 4/5, with approximately 100% of feedback being positive. Students highlight excellent industry connections, an international environment, and practical business education. The campus offers a balanced daily experience and diverse dining options.
With a 4.2/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~80% of feedback is positive, highlighting a modern campus, supportive academic staff, and good facilities. A small amount of negative feedback (~7%) mentions a lack of social life and events.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~0% negative feedback. Students praise the free tuition and wide range of masters specializations, highlighting a conducive academic and diverse environment.
Based on one review, the university received a perfect 5/5 rating. Positive feedback (~100%) highlights a comprehensive understanding of the Norwegian welfare model.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%), with students highlighting good facilities, helpful teachers, and diverse course options. Some mention fast Wi-Fi and budget-friendly fees. A minor point noted was that online master's classes could feel rushed.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Due to unexpected circumstances of the Covid-19 pandemic students faced some issues regarding accommodation in which they were moving from dormitory to another within one week. during the online study and since this is the first time the university conducts such an approach the outcome was satisfactory due to some delays in response and lack of some material ( sessions on Zoom meeting ), However, overall study experience is good. Not only the study experience was good also the university organized events for international studies on a monthly basis for site seeing to explore cities in Hungary in addition to other indoor events within the university premises, but the university also has several sports training and activities, social gathering to maintain the well-being of the students
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
