Universidade Nove de Julho - UNINOVE vs Norwegian University of Science and Technology - NTNU vs BI Norwegian Business School - BI vs NHH Norwegian School of Economics vs University of Oslo
Side-by-side comparison from 33 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality teaching and expert professors
- +Excellent facilities and learning materials
- +Affordable tuition and career readiness
- +strong academic programs & practical exposure
- +vibrant social life & student organizations
- +knowledgeable professors & engaging lectures
- +Knowledgeable lecturers and strong academic environment
- +Practical approach and industry connections
- +Good location and food variety
- +Free tuition and diverse program options
- +High quality education and international exchange opportunities
- +Supportive environment and welcoming community
- +Insightful understanding of Norwegian welfare model
- +Exploration of universalism, public sector strength, and social solidarity
- +Balance of economic competitiveness and social protection
- +Practical, real-world insights from industry professionals
- +Interactive learning and collaborative projects
- +Modern, welcoming campus facilities
- +Strong practical focus and industry relevance
- +Supportive faculty and positive community environment
- +Holistic development beyond academics
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -A lack of effective communication and support is a common problem.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are frustrating.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and unhelpful instructors are a major concern.
- -Administrative and management issues create unnecessary obstacles and stress.
- -Students dislike the lack of proper support and communication from staff.
- -They often complain about outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources.
- -Students express frustration with the curriculum and teaching methods being unengaging or irrelevant.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring concern.
- -Poor teaching quality and curriculum relevance are often criticized.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning and comfort.
- -The curriculum lacks depth and practical application.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are problematic.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring concern.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common concern.
- -Inconsistent communication and poor course structure lead to frustration.
This university garners excellent scores in several key areas. Its location is a standout feature, alongside strong marks for professors and overall value. Student life and facilities also receive positive reviews. Areas for potential improvement include accommodation and internationality, which scored lower than other metrics.
This institution garners strong approval, particularly in student life, its strongest area. Facilities and location also receive high marks. Conversely, internationality stands out as the weakest point among the evaluated aspects. Accommodation, professors, and overall value are rated positively, indicating a generally well-regarded university experience.
This institution demonstrates remarkable strengths, with exceptional ratings for its Facilities, Professors, and Location, all scoring an impressive 4.5. Student Life and Internationality also receive solid marks at 4. However, Accommodations and Value emerge as areas needing development, each receiving a lower score of 3.
This institution receives exceptionally high marks for its facilities and accommodation, both scoring an outstanding 4.7. Professors and internationality are also strong points, with ratings of 4.4. Student life and value for money are rated at 4.3 and 4.1 respectively. The university's location is its weakest area, though still a respectable 4.1.
Remarkably, this institution achieved a perfect score of 5 out of 5 in every evaluated category. The facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all considered outstanding. There are no apparent weak areas, as all aspects of the university have been rated at the highest possible level.
Demonstrating a clear strength in its academic offerings, the university received a perfect score for its professors. Areas such as facilities and accommodation also scored well, indicating a solid foundation. Conversely, location and student life were rated as average, while internationality and value presented a more favorable, yet not outstanding, picture.
This institution garners excellent marks, particularly excelling in its professors and internationality, both receiving a perfect score. Student life also stands out with a 4.5 rating. Facilities, location, and accommodation are all rated a solid 4. Its value proposition is also exceptionally high, scoring a 5. Overall, the university presents a compelling and well-rounded offering.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students praise excellent professors, facilities, and course quality, recommending the university. No negative feedback was provided.
With a 4.44/5 average from 9 reviews, ~89% are positive. Students highlight excellent education and social life, especially for engineering. No negative feedback was provided.
With an average rating of 4/5, student feedback is highly positive. Reviewers consistently praise the great location, knowledgeable lecturers, and strong academic environment. Industry connections and a practical approach to education were also highlighted.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~0% negative feedback. Students praise the free tuition and wide range of masters specializations, highlighting a conducive academic and diverse environment.
Based on one review, the university received a perfect 5/5 rating. Positive feedback (~100%) highlights a comprehensive understanding of the Norwegian welfare model.
With an average rating of 4.5/5 from 2 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Students highlight well-structured, practical courses and engaged, professional instructors, with no negative reviews recorded.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating from two reviews, the university garners overwhelmingly positive feedback (~100%). Students highlight strong practical skills, good faculty support, and positive campus environments. No negative feedback was reported.
University with low tuition fees, promoting the democratization of education, good cost-benefit ratio. However, it needs to improve some aspects such as: Organization; Structure; And finally, increase the level of the exams, thus raising the difficulty for university students and increasing the level of learning.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
