Norwegian University of Science and Technology - NTNU vs Graduate School of Agriculture and Bioengineering - ISA Lille vs BI Norwegian Business School - BI vs NHH Norwegian School of Economics vs Iowa State University - ISU
Side-by-side comparison from 20 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong academic programs and knowledgeable professors.
- +Practical experience and career opportunities.
- +Vibrant student life and city atmosphere.
Nothing to show
- +Strong industry connections and practical business education
- +International environment and balanced daily life
- +Excellent and varied food options
- +Free tuition and diverse program options
- +High quality education and international exchange opportunities
- +Supportive environment and welcoming community
- +Academic exploration and critical thinking fostered
- +Beautiful campus and helpful resources
- +Flexibility to pursue diverse interests
Nothing to show
- +Insightful understanding of Norwegian welfare model
- +Exploration of universalism, public sector strength, and social solidarity
- +Balance of economic competitiveness and social protection
- -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources significantly hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of clear guidance are prevalent.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of student support are common complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring concern.
- -Poor teaching quality and curriculum relevance are often criticized.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning and comfort.
- -The curriculum lacks depth and practical application.
This institution garners strong performance in student life, achieving the highest rating. Facilities, location, and value are also well-regarded. Professors and accommodation ratings are solid, while internationality is rated comparably. Overall, the university presents a positive profile with particular strengths in student engagement and practical aspects.
Nothing to show
Impressive scores characterize this institution, particularly in its **facilities**, **location**, and **internationality**, all receiving perfect marks. Student experience is further bolstered by a commendable **student life** and a strong **professor** evaluation. However, **accommodation** presents a notable weakness with a score of 2, and the **value** proposition sits in the middle with a rating of 3.
This institution receives exceptionally high marks for its facilities and accommodation, both scoring an outstanding 4.7. Professors and internationality are also strong points, with ratings of 4.4. Student life and value for money are rated at 4.3 and 4.1 respectively. The university's location is its weakest area, though still a respectable 4.1.
This institution receives exceptional ratings for its Location, Student Life, and Accommodations, all scoring an impressive 4.67. Facilities and Internationality are also well-regarded, with scores of 4.33. Professors are rated a solid 4, representing the lowest score among the surveyed categories. Overall, the university presents a strong offering, particularly in campus experience and environment.
Nothing to show
Remarkably, this institution achieved a perfect score of 5 out of 5 in every evaluated category. The facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all considered outstanding. There are no apparent weak areas, as all aspects of the university have been rated at the highest possible level.
The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~75% of reviews rating it 4-5 stars. Students praise its strong research technologies, engineering, and pragmatic programs. A vibrant student city atmosphere is also a recurring highlight.
Nothing to show
This university receives a strong average rating of 4/5, with approximately 100% of feedback being positive. Students highlight excellent industry connections, an international environment, and practical business education. The campus offers a balanced daily experience and diverse dining options.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~0% negative feedback. Students praise the free tuition and wide range of masters specializations, highlighting a conducive academic and diverse environment.
With a 4.33/5 average rating, reviews highlight a positive academic environment encouraging exploration and critical thinking. Students appreciate the flexibility to pursue diverse interests, though one mentioned average dining hall food with limited seating.
Nothing to show
Based on one review, the university received a perfect 5/5 rating. Positive feedback (~100%) highlights a comprehensive understanding of the Norwegian welfare model.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
