Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey - ITESM vs Universidad Anáhuac vs Instituto Superior de Intérpretes y Traductores - ISIT vs Universidad del Claustro de Sor Juana - UCSJ vs Universidad en Línea - UTEL
Side-by-side comparison from 114 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and knowledgeable professors
- +Diverse extracurricular activities and opportunities
- +High academic standards and real-world project focus
- +Leadership and values development
- +Academic excellence and practical application
- +Supportive community and modern facilities
Nothing to show
- +Strong humanities and arts foundation.
- +Excellent, specialized programs like gastronomy.
- +Focus on humanistic skills and free thinking.
- +Expert professors and practical career knowledge
- +Flexible online learning options
- +Valuable skill development and enriching experience
Nothing to show
- +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
- +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
- +Engaging hybrid learning format
- -Lack of student support and unresponsive administration
- -Poor faculty engagement and effort
- -Failure to address student safety concerns
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is evident.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of effective communication and clear guidance is prevalent.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of practical application and insufficient support hinder learning.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Perceived lack of value for money.
An analysis of university ratings reveals a generally positive profile. Facilities and location are standout areas, both scoring over 4.5. Student life and professors also received strong marks. Conversely, accommodation emerged as the weakest point among the evaluated aspects. Internationality and value for money are rated moderately well, falling between the highest and lowest scores.
This institution garners excellent scores, with accommodation standing out as its strongest area at 4.65625. Student life and value also received high marks. Professors represent the area with the lowest rating at 4.40625, though it remains a very positive score. Overall, the university demonstrates considerable strengths in most aspects evaluated.
Nothing to show
This institution receives strong commendations for its **professors** and **value**, both scoring a high 4.5. Facilities and location also received favorable ratings of 4. Student life is rated a respectable 3.5, while internationality stands at 2.5. The most significant area for improvement is **accommodation**, which received a low score of 1.
Across several key areas, this institution demonstrates notable strengths. Its location and professors are particularly well-regarded, receiving the highest ratings. Conversely, accommodation emerges as the weakest point, scoring lowest among the surveyed categories. Other aspects like facilities, student life, internationality, and value are rated moderately, suggesting areas for potential improvement while maintaining a generally positive standing.
Nothing to show
With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.
~98.6% of reviews are positive, highlighting great classes, supportive professors, and personal growth opportunities. A single negative review expressed concerns about student care and safety issues.
With ~97% positive feedback and an average of 4.58/5, students praise academic excellence, leadership development, and integral personal growth programs. No negative reviews were recorded.
Nothing to show
All reviews are positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight excellent programs and teachers in areas like Art History and Human Sciences, valuing the focus on humanistic skills and international recognition, particularly in gastronomy.
With an average rating of 4.33/5, ~67% of reviews are positive. Students highlight qualified professors and a positive online learning experience, including acquiring career-relevant knowledge and reinforcing computer skills. No negative reviews were recorded.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.
ITESM is a college that greatly values student development in every aspect of their lives, from a deep and personal level up to the professional aspect of the University. The courses and classes have a modern way of teaching students different lessons and subjects in easy, fast and innovative ways in order to acquire as much information as possible, leaving space at the end of the career path to get a more deep and concentrated approach to the field of studies you wish to focus on. To finish it up there are hundreds of opportunities and activities to develop your personal self and your social abilities and connections; the School truly values the sense of entrepreneurship and social responsibility, among other core values, and it makes an effort to really make students feel like part of the TEC community through the years.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
