Queen Mary University of London - QMUL vs Universidad La Paz vs Universidad Nacional del Este - UNE vs Universidad Privada del Este - UPE vs Universidad José Antonio Páez - UJAP
Side-by-side comparison from 225 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
- +Welcoming community and social opportunities
- +Clear information and good academic structure
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Excellent professors and comprehensive curriculum
- +Modern and well-equipped facilities, including labs
- +Strong connection between academics and practical/work fields
- +Quality education with knowledgeable and inspiring faculty
- +Opportunities for extracurricular involvement and scientific activities
- +Well-equipped facilities including advanced laboratories and gyms
Nothing to show
- -Lack of course support and practical industry preparation.
- -Poor communication and administrative issues regarding modules and projects.
- -Disruptions from strikes and lack of compensation for missed learning.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a consistent complaint.
- -The curriculum is perceived as unengaging and irrelevant by many.
- -Outdated facilities and teaching methods.
- -Poor teaching quality and outdated faculty.
- -Limited options and external interference.
Nothing to show
Overall, this university receives positive feedback across most aspects. Internationality stands out as the strongest area, boasting a high rating. The university also performs well in Facilities and Student Life. Areas for potential improvement include Accomodation and Value, which received lower scores compared to other categories.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Examining university ratings reveals a highly regarded institution. Its strongest areas are clearly Professors (4.75) and Student Life (4.675), indicating excellent academic instruction and vibrant campus activities. Facilities and Location also score well. However, Accomodation (3.475) and particularly Internationality (2.95) present areas for improvement. The overall Value (4.175) suggests a positive return for students.
This university demonstrates notable strengths, particularly in its **location** and **student life**, both earning high marks of 4. Professors also received a strong rating of 4. Areas requiring improvement include accommodation, scoring 3, and its internationality, which received the lowest rating at 2.75. The university also offers a solid value proposition and good facilities.
Nothing to show
~77% of 208 reviews are positive, praising supportive faculty, welcoming environments, and good opportunities. Minimal negative feedback, ~2%, notes limited support and communication issues.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
All 5 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.2/5. Recurring themes highlight excellent teachers, a complete curriculum, and good facilities. Some suggest incorporating more practical, work-field-linked programs and improved computer lab installations.
~55% of reviews are positive, highlighting extracurriculars, good professors, and advanced labs. ~9% express dissatisfaction with teaching quality and faculty, noting limited alternatives. The average rating is 3.73/5.
Nothing to show
While the first year was full of compulsory modules and slightly overwhelming, I have really enjoyed the last two years. They have allowed me to explore what I am genuinely interested in (specifically human rights) by offering such a wide range of modules. This is what I have enjoyed most out of the course. There was a long directory of modules to choose from in the last two years, all with different types of assignments (either entirely exam-based, entirely coursework or a mixture of the two). As I picked mostly human-rights based modules and such, I have realised that I want to work in this field too, and am also preparing to apply to a masters in this field within the next two years. However, some of the module assignments changed after registration in the third year, and this caused some problems in the last semester when students tried to change modules, as each module change is done manually in the Politics department. I know that some students, including myself, were unhappy with this experience when modules filled up too quickly. Student support has been amazing. Lecturers and professors have been very helpful with assignment-support. The help has ranged from office hours to telephone calls and emails. In my second and third year, I have found this particularly helpful in pushing my grade higher as lecturers are always open to looking over essay and assignment plans and offering helpful advice. One small problem that I encountered with this in the third year was that marking criteria was inconsistent with some modules and lecturers. However, this was only limited to one or two modules, and overall, I was happy with my experience. Career support is also very good. I only started using the resources available from the careers office this year, but it has been a good experience. Meetings are available every week and I have used them to get my cover letter checked as well as having a mock interview for an internship. This really helped me to prepare for possible questions as it was my first interview. I would definitely recommend this course and university to a friend. I have enjoyed my time and know what I want to do in the future career-wise.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
UTM teaches old materials in the IT field, every day this world is developing and UTM all but not so fast that the technologies that appear every day. There is too much material in the study program that takes a lot of time to study, and students fail to understand normally the field they are taught.
Nothing to show
