University of Cambridge
speciality: History

General:
The college system has its pros and cons. I am a fan as it means that you have a close community in the university, however it does mean that there is little to no student union activities (our student union consists of a single room on a floor of a building that I have only visited to collect vinted parcels)
Cambridge itself is a lovely place to live, everything is walkable and green (apart from Girton and Homerton rip), but the night life is a bit lacking (fine if you are a nerd like me). Very much small town vibes.
The standard of academic and pastoral support is very high- you will have opportunities for travel and study beyond that of other universities. And it does have lots of fancy and weird activities which are very fun.

History of Art specific:
Expect around 5 hours of taught (contact) hours a week, which imo is very little and maybe something I should have considered more
Very self directed, essays every week and lots of coursework, means that the degree can be quite anti-social and isolated (I have no other art history student in my year in college)
Accessibility is not the best, but is improving, as well as the diversity of art historical study.
If you struggle with self-directed study and reading a lot this is probably not the place to study this degree for you.

with all that said, I have loved my time here, it is very sheltered and you don’t have to deal with renting and other stresses, so it gives you the space to really delve into your subject.

Cambridge University provides a unique experience to its students. The difficulty of this is that it is hard to tell whether this experience is the right one for you.

If you are looking at applying to the University of Cambridge, I would recommend following these tips:

> Choose your college carefully;
>>> Colleges have a larger impact on your overall educational experience than you think. It is your college who organises the bulk of your teaching, so it’s the wealth and contacts they have that often determines what that teaching looks like. It is worth emailing the Director of Studies in your subject at different colleges to see what kind of teaching is provided.
>>> Your choice of college also impacts your application process. Competitive colleges who score higher in the Tompkins Table (which ranks the colleges by academic success) – ie those colleges that are more likely to be richer and have ‘better contacts’ – are much more picky with candidates, and choose those who already show a deep knowledge and natural proficiency towards your subject. Colleges lower down the Tompkins Table are often more nurturing of your individual ability and interest. You can still do very well academically without being at a highly-achieving college.
>>> Sometimes applying to a college is also about strategy – if a college had a high number of applicants over the past few years (this information is publicly available) then they are more likely to be harder to get into.
>>> It is also important to consider how much financial assistance you might need when applying to colleges. Unfortunately if you know that you are in need of financial assistance you are probably not going to want to apply to a ‘poorer’ college. Look at each college’s website to see the kind of bursaries they offer to help you determine whether a college is right for you.

> Pay close attention to course content;
>>> If you are applying to Oxbridge, look carefully at how each year of your course is structured. (If this information is not readily available on either the Cambridge University website or faculty website, you can email the faculty secretary for this information.) This includes which modules are compulsory, which aren’t and how they are examined. It is good to compare how Cambridge and Oxford courses are structured because they tend to be very different and one may suit you much better than the other. If you find that the course you want to choose is lacking, it is probably not worth choosing Oxbridge just for the title. At the end of the day, the uni you choose determines your overall experience just as much as it determines the piece of paper you get at the end of it, and your experience is going to be heavily impacted by how much you enjoy what you are actually studying.

> Student experience;
>>> Cambridge is known for being an intense and rigorous university. Before applying you need to think very carefully about whether this is right for you. In some cases, this may involve sacrificing a social life for your academics.
>>> That being said, you can make Cambridge work for you. The university has a huge number of societies, a decent nightlife and the city is a really lovely environment to live in. Prepare for the societies to be fairly high-level; most societies can be criticised for not being very welcoming to complete beginners. Whether Cambridge is the right fit for you really depends on your attitude towards the university experience as a whole, and what you want to get out of it.

> Your educational background;
>>> It pains me to say but your experience at Cambridge will to an extent be affected by your educational background. If you come from a state comprehensive background, where you are unlikely to have had a very intense workload or a great deal of pressure on yourself, Cambridge will feel very different. You may be thinking that I’m over-exaggerating, but it is worth noting that there’s a huge difference between being really self-motivated at secondary school and sixth form to being dealt a Cambridge workload and being forced to float. I’m not saying this to be discouraging – I’m from a state-comp background and I’m still here after three years – but more to prepare you. Students who come from better educational backgrounds are much more used to juggling harsher work schedules, so their experience will be different. It’s worth asking yourself how much you enjoy working hard, and whether it’s something you want to continue to do for another three/four years.

The Cambridge experience is a very unique one, and this comes with its own challenges, but also many advantages. For those whom a collegiate university is the right fit, and who want to work hard at a subject they enjoy, Cambridge is a place to truly thrive.

I had the opportunity to get a scholarship and study at Cambridge. The experience was out of this world.

The quality of education is excellent. I had companions from all over the world. Classes could be taken in multiple languages.

The teachers were generally very good. And the administration was good (a bit bureaucratic but it’s normal).

Two young people I know (but unconnected with each other) who had offers from Cambridge both turned their offers down. In both cases they had decided that they preferred the structure and content of the course (Maths in one case, Psychology in the other) on offer at Surrey, one of the UK’s newer universities. Both have gone on to do doctorates, and have done well, and neither regrets their choice.

I think a certain amount of “it’s ancient so it must be the best” snobbery attaches itself to Oxford and Cambridge — either that or “it’s quite new so it must be rubbish.” In 1970, my best friend and I were very attracted by the new university of Warwick. Our elderly English teacher pulled herself up to her full 4′ 11″ and remarked, “Well, if you wish to apply to a jumped up polytechnic, that is no-one’s concern but your own. However, you will not cite me for a reference!”

It is statistically harder to get into Warwick to do English than Oxford.

Completing an undergraduate degree at Cambridge is an intense experience. The demanding teaching, short terms, and close-knit college communities combine to create an environment in which both work and extra-curricular activities can become all-consuming. It was a common saying among students that one had enough time during the term for only two out of the three of work, sleep and social life; although only true in part, this gives a flavour of the pressures experienced by students who, in their schooling prior to Cambridge, may not have had to make such compromises in order to achieve everything they wanted.

The demanding nature of studying at Cambridge is balanced by the sense of achievement, common endeavour, and opportunity: working with some of the top academics in their field stretches students to reach their potential; whatever your interests, there will no doubt be a welcoming community who share it – whether within your college or in the wider university; and the collective atmosphere created by the history, architecture, and indeed energy of the various institutions that make up the University was not one of stuffy tradition, but one of excitement and innovation. I think I appreciate it even more in retrospect than I did at the time.

A word on the course: the Classics Tripos at Cambridge consists initially of two years of intense linguistic and literary study, during which reading of Latin and Greek texts is the dominant component of the course; this, along with a selection of optional papers, prepares students to specialise into their preferred disciplines in the third year. The supervision system is an excellent, if sometimes inconsistent, the way in which to study texts in-depth, developing skills for both close reading and thematic analysis of texts.

Teaching quality is excellent – one on one supervisions with the leaders in the field. Wide variety of lectures & papers offered, as well as significant reign to do own research in third year dissertation. Amazing resources especially libraries – each faculty has a library and any student can go and study in it. The University Library Is one of the only libraries in the UK that legally gets a copy of every book published in the UK so always has books you need. College system makes playing sport casually really easy and fun, and is great for fostering tight friendship groups. City itself is beaut and easy to navigate (can walk pretty much anywhere you need to go).

After I completed a degree with the Open University I was so interested in my last course on family and local history that I applied for the above diploma. It was a very interesting course and I had great fun going to different archives and being able to get involved first-hand with original documents. The dissertation for the diploma was based on the fishing villages of Leigh on Sea, Essex, Paglesham, Essex and Lowestoft, Suffolk. The course was for one year so was quite intense as I also had a full-time job. It was really good though as it was my first real experience of being part of a university with lots of students and lectures that I could attend if I wished to. The tutor for the diploma also became my supervisor for my Masters degree at Cambridge and we were able to build a good relationship.

I completed a part-time Master of Studies in Local and Regional History. It was a very interesting course and I loved being able to use the university library and the college libraries as well as other collections such as at the British Library. It was only a small group of people – about 20. We attended Homerton College once a week during the first year during which time we had to complete and pass essays in related subjects. In the second year we had a tutor that we met regularly. My thesis was on the Old Poor Law in Terling, Paglesham and March, Essex from 1780 to 1834.

It was quite a hard course for me to do as I had another full-time job working in London. I had to ask for extra time to complete the course which was agreed – I was the only course member to have a full-time job as well as completing the course. I enjoyed my time on the course but I would have liked to have been able to do the course full-time so that I could make full use of the Cambridge facilities. At times I felt quite isolated from other university students – we never really met many apart from at some dinners as we were part-time and didn’t go to their lectures.