Universidad Tecnológica Intercontinental - UTIC vs Universidad Nacional de Caaguazu - UNCA vs Cracow University of Technology - PK vs VIVES University of Applied Sciences - VIVES vs The College of St. Scholastica

Side-by-side comparison from 28 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Tecnológica Intercontinental - UTIC (5.00)
Universidad Tecnológica Intercontinental - UTIC: wins 7/7 categories
Universidad Nacional de Caaguazu - UNCA: wins 0/7 categories
Cracow University of Technology - PK: wins 0/7 categories
VIVES University of Applied Sciences - VIVES: wins 0/7 categories
The College of St. Scholastica: wins 0/7 categories
Saint Monica University Higher Institute: wins 0/7 categories
ESPRIT: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Advertising and Marketing
Best programme: Electrical Engineering
Best programme: Aeronautical Engineering
Duluth, Minnesota, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Tunis, Tunisia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.25
4.33
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Location
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.23
4.33
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.06
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.35
3.56
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.25
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Value
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.29
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
3.71
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical knowledge and skills for career application
  • +Support and mentorship for lower-level students

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, up-to-date courses and hands-on learning
  • +Helpful, passionate professors and supportive staff
  • +Opportunities for personal and academic growth
  • +Strong theory-to-practice integration and practical application
  • +Modern and well-equipped facilities
  • +Engaging community activities and supportive environment

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning experiences.
  • -Communication is often poor, leading to confusion and lack of clarity.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty and staff is disappointing.
  • -Excessive administrative burden and inefficient management processes
  • -Lack of modern technology and outdated facilities
  • -Insufficient faculty support and unresponsive staff

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Across all assessed aspects, this institution achieves perfect scores. Its strongest areas, mirroring its overall excellent performance, include outstanding facilities, distinguished professors, an ideal location, vibrant student life, quality accommodation, robust internationality, and exceptional value for money. There are no discernible weak areas, as every category has been rated with a perfect score.

Nothing to show

This institution receives strong acclaim for its internationality, scoring 4.35, and its value, rated at 4.29. Facilities and student life are also highly regarded, both at 4.25. Professors are well-rated at 4.06, while accommodation stands as the weakest area, with a score of 4. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded picture with particularly impressive international appeal.

Overall, this institution receives a positive evaluation, with particularly strong scores for **Facilities** and **Location**, both rated at approximately 4.3. **Professors**, **Student Life**, and **Value** also received solid ratings of 4. The weakest areas identified are **Accomodation** at around 3.7 and **Internationality**, which scored approximately 3.56.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

The single review is highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Approximately 100% of feedback is positive, highlighting a wonderful learning experience that provided useful knowledge.

Nothing to show

Nearly all 100% of reviews are positive, with students highlighting practical and up-to-date courses, helpful professors, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. The average rating is 4.06/5.

VIVES University of Applied Sciences is highly recommended, with ~89% of reviews being positive. Students praise well-structured lessons, practical application, and good facilities. Some minor areas for improvement include more teacher support during practical sessions.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
100%
0%
22%
22%
0%
0%
0%
4★
0%
0%
61%
67%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
17%
11%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The Best of Hands-On Learning

VIVES University of Applied Sciences really nails that combo of theory and practical learning. Useful information is jam-packed into the courses, and the lab sessions are seriously awesome since we get to mess around with all kinds of aircraft and even helicopters. Plus, all the resources they give us really help us take what we learn in class and use it in the real world without any hassle. You know, some teachers like to let us figure things out ourselves, but most of them are super into explaining stuff and really good at it. All in all, VIVES is a great pick for anyone wanting hands-on, future-oriented learning.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close